similar to: routing multiple network cards on a single subnet

I have a Centos 5 machine here that, up until about a year ago, was happily running Icecast and serving streaming audio through through three network connections, consisting of one "local" connection (local address 192.168.1.5) and two cable modems to talk to the outside world. We shut this down about a year ago, but now I am attempting to get it going again on one outside connection

Hello all Here is the scenario: We have a mail server VM which currently has two virtual NICs attached to it. One NIC is has an IP on a subnet with a default gateway defined and the other NIC has an IP on a different subnet with a different gateway on a different VLAN defined. Now when I activate both NICs, and run an ifconfig -a, I see that both IP addresses are showing. Now here is the

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/bmp Size: 2918 bytes Desc: Picture (Metafile) Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050307/cb404791/attachment.bmp

I can't seem to dial out with Voicepulse Open Access service using *. Incoming works fine. Another user posted a few weeks back that they were having problems and there are some threads at dslreports.com about this as well. Maybe someone here can figure out what the issue is from the sip debug info below. I am at a loss. The audible error message from Allison is 0984 (from VP server) Here is

Hi to all i think this is not a new problem for this forum....but its newest for me as i m a new linux lerner. Even if it is new plzz....reply me ur answer..n if its already asked n have solution..plzz forward the solution. My problem is here mentioned: I have fedora core 4 as a linux server. there r two external links connected to this. the settings are as: eth0 ->for internal (that is

I have a server with 4 nics. Two are using different internet connections, both with static IP's, and two are connected to our private network. The two internet facing nics seem to be battling over the gateway designation. Which ever I designate as the gateway the other stops responding to incoming traffic. I need both to listen to inbound traffic. One for our main web page and the other

Hi, I followed the instructions posted on the shorewall web page for transparent proxy, but I still cannot get it to work. I have almost the same setup as described on the web, running squid on dmz, eth1, and the loc on eth2. I can see that packets going out from the fw, they are not sent to the squid proxy, and if I try to telnet to the squid proxy to port 80, where I should be directed to

I am working on a split route and ShoreWall system. I reviewed the lartc documentation but have a few areas that I still need help on. Here is my network: 64.xxx.xxx.1/25 66.xxx.xxx.129/26 | | ################################################# # Eth2 64.xxx.xxx.2 eth0 66.xxx.xxx.130 # #

I recently upgraded a server''s rubygems from 0.9.0 to 1.2.0. Upon doing so, one of our apps that uses soap4r thinks all the security certificates it sees are invalid (see Error 1 below). I tried reverting to 0.9.0, but anything that uses rubygems crashes now (see Error 2 below). If anyone could help me solve either problem, that would be great. Ideally, I''d like to run the latest

Hi all !! I would to like to mark and route some kind of traffic (ie: outbound www, now by simplicity) ---inet1--------eth0------------| | | linux | --eth1------- clientes ---inet2(90.0.0.1)--------eth2-| | I have eth0 and eth1 bridged (eth2 is not bridged). I would to route www outbound clients

Hi all !! I would to like to mark and route some kind of traffic (ie: outbound www, now by simplicity) ---inet1--------eth0------------| | | linux | --eth1------- clientes ---inet2(90.0.0.1)--------eth2-| | I have eth0 and eth1 bridged (eth2 is not bridged). I would to route www outbound clients

ok i will do it in text: 66.92.114.46 eth0 209.141.2.194 eth1 192.168.119.101 eth2 192.168.120.101 eth3 What i have is a linux box RH7.3 which will eventually run Shorewall Firewall. On this box there is eth0 66.92.114.46 conneted to isp1 and eth1 209.141.2.194 connected to isp2 It also has eth2 192.168.119.101 and eth3 192.168.120.101 which will connect to a failover appliance which has 2 wan

Hi, I have the following situation: 1 gateway box with 2 WAN interfaces (eth1 and eth2). 1 LAN interface eth0 default gateway is eth2 I want to route all traffic with destination protocol tcp 22 (ssh) NOT over the default gateway eth2 but force them to find it''s route over eth1. All other traffic must go the normal way over eth2. Is this possible with tc or an other tool? --

Hi all, I have a similar question like many asked before I know but Please help as i cant figure out where the problem is and how should I tackle. I have 2 ISP connections. I want to share the bandwidth from both. I have copied the script from many places and created my own after changes. Problem is that only one connection is utilized at a time. Not both working. ratio of consuming

Hi, I have a simple question (well, at least I think it''s simple!). I have a router, with four Ethernet cards; eth0-eth3. eth0 and eth3 are the ''external'' cards, connecting to my ISPs. eth1 and eth2 are connected to my internal networks. What I want to do is basically filter all the traffic from one card to another, in this configuration: eth1 to eth3 eth2 to eth0

Hi, Apologies for the cross-posting; I''m not sure whether this is a firewall or routing issue, or both! I have four network cards, detailed below. eth0 and eth3 connect to my ISPs, and eth1 and eth2 connect to local networks. I want to route all traffic from eth2 to eth0, and from eth1 to eth3. However, I am having a few problems with this. eth0 ip: 192.168.100.253/24 gw:

hello, the topology is like this: centos v0:eth1 <------> centos v0: eth2 fc00:2:3:4::1 fc00:2:3::4 i turned the packet forwarding ping6 -i eth2 fc00:2:3:4::1 the output is PING fc00:2:3:4::1(fc00:2:3:4::1) from fc00:2:3::5 eth2: 56 data bytes >From fc00:2:3::4 icmp_seq=1 Destination unreachable: Administratively prohibited >From fc00:2:3::4 icmp_seq=2

I can't figure this one out. There's a Belken USB->Ethernet adapter as eth2 on my server. After a reboot it doesn't communicate with anything ever though it's up: ipaddress is 68.15.6.136 gateway is 68.15.6.129 # ifconfig eth2 eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:05:1B:00:52:BF inet addr:68.15.6.136 Bcast:68.15.6.191 Mask:255.255.255.192 inet6

I''ve made some tests... eth2 is my internal interface, LAN is connected here. Before I had IMQ device in AB mode... PREROUTING [A]fter NAT, POSTROUTING [B]efore NAT. I want the same situation on ifb. I do this in this way: --- # incoming traffic here from LAN is before NAT tc qdisc add dev eth2 handle ffff: ingress # outcoming traffic here from WAN is after NAT tc qdisc add dev eth2

I''m using Debian (sarge) I do now have 2 ISP, one DSL and one cabel. I want to use the DSL as my primary and only use the cabel-modem if the DSL fails. The setup is: IP1 -> Router -> NAT_IP1 -> eth0 -> eth2 (LAN) IP2 -> Cable-Modem -> eth1 -> eth2 (LAN) I wrote the following in my /etc/iproute2/rt_tables ip rule add from NAT_IP1 lookup 1 ip route add