similar to: [story] Thank goodness for links and caching DNS

I am trying to add 127.0.0.1 to my resolv.conf. I added it through the system-config-network but if I reboot, its gone. I do not have the caching nameserver package installed. My ISP's nameservers are there. It must have something to do with DHCP. Also, in the network config GUI, should I select the IPv6 option for either or both network cards? TIA

I have removed the updated caching-nameserver from the core OS repo of CentOS 3.4 i386 as there have been reports of nameservers losing their configuration and stopping when the update was applied. I have reverted caching-nameserver in the 3.4 core OS back to the CentOS 3.3 version caching-nameserver-7.2-7.noarch.rpm. The new version caching-nameserver-7.3-3_EL3.noarch.rpm is now in the testing

Hi, The subject says it all. On my "server" machine in the local LAN (192.168.1.252 in a 192.168.1.0/24 network), I setup Bind. I installed the 'caching-nameserver' package, which provides a set of configuration files for Bind so it can be used as a caching nameserver out of the box. On the server : I start bind (service named start), and try it out. # host www.google.fr

On 08/27/2018 09:05 AM, TE Dukes wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Richard >> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 7:58 AM >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mail has quit working >> >>> Date: Monday, August 27, 2018 07:42:48 -0400 >>> From: TE Dukes

> Date: Sunday, August 26, 2018 22:37:55 -0400 > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> > >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of >> Richard Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2018 10:25 PM >> >> >> > Date: Sunday, August 26, 2018 21:10:48 -0400 >> > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> >>

Added back the IPV6 to /etc/hosts a couple days ago for grins and giggles. No longer getting IPV6 errors in logwatch for bind. Everything working. I think removing my ISP's nameservers from /etc/resolv.conf was the fix. They have been in there forever so still have my fingers crossed. Again, many thanks!!

Hi All, I did a clean install of CentOS 5.3 yesterday. During setup I activated both adapters on startup. etho is my public IP and eth1 is my private/internal IP. It did not let me specify nameservers though. So I know this is resolv.conf. I know I put in: nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx But how do I put in nameservers for specific networks? Example, I want my

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:18:36 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:57:16 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 20:43:17 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:18:31 -0500 > > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >

Thanks!! I've restored the server, i've installed all from backports to start in a clean configuration, and I've tried the suggestions but i've got the same result. The Windows machine is using the router dhcp server, but dns are configured manually to use the server as dns. Anyway I can live with that because I can log using HOME\User and works fine. Only was curiosity.

El 23/6/2015 8:11 p. m., "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> escribi?: > > On 23/06/15 18:58, Daniel Carrasco Mar?n wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I've sucessfull created a secondary DC using the wiki manual ( >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC), and is working >> perfectly, user and groups are synced on both

On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > ipconfig apparently assumes that the dhcp server's ip address is the > nameserver when dhcp gives it no nameservers, dhcp gives the nameserver > 0.0.0.0, or the nameservers are not ip addresses (i.e. ns1.example.org). > while these scenarios are probably not extremely common, i'm not sure > this is a good default with no

hi, I have a debian system with shorewall acting as a router between my adsl line and my local network. One of the things on that local network is my playstation, and I''m having trouble playing an online game with it - the game tries to access the internet, and then fails at the stage where it tries to find the game servers. The debian machine is 192.168.0.3, and the playstation is

Thanks for you answer. My OS are Debian 7u8 as server, and Windows 7 as client. I'm doing the test on virtual machines and the dhcp server is a simple router. Anyway i'm using a static IP: iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.1.100 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 192.168.1.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 gateway 192.168.1.1 dns-nameservers

hi all, currently my websites are sharing one server, also having bind running on that server for all of them. I am now breaking the sites on to different machines. So what would you do on bond/dns? I was thinking of making two servers as nameservers, one master, one slave, for all my domains. For resolution of the server itself I was originally going to make a recursive caching nameserver

> Date: Monday, August 27, 2018 07:42:48 -0400 > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> > >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of >> Richard Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 7:29 AM > >> >> Since the localhost4 approach worked, commend out the ipv6 >> localhost entries in your /etc/hosts file, then try: >>

> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Gordon > Messmer > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 6:23 PM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mail has quit working > > On 08/29/2018 06:54 PM, TE Dukes wrote: > > Added back the IPV6 to /etc/hosts a couple days ago for grins and giggles. > > No longer

On 13/02/2020 13:11, Paul Littlefield wrote: > On 12/02/2020 13:08, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> The first is that a DC must use itself as its nameserver and if >> something goes wrong e.g. Samba has fallen over, then there isn't >> much point having another nameserver, Samba isn't going to use it >> >> The second is, it will not hurt having a second

> Date: Monday, August 27, 2018 09:05:05 -0400 > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of >> Richard Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 7:58 AM >> >> > Date: Monday, August 27, 2018 07:42:48 -0400 >> > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> >> > >>

Hi all, I have a CentOS 5.4 server-only installation, i.e. no X installed, and for some odd reason /etc/resolve.conf gets overwritten by NetworkManager on a constant basis. I haven't been able to track down how often, but I think it's on the hour, or something. This is the conents of the file right now: # Generated by NetworkManager # No nameservers found; try putting DNS servers into

I lost my internet connection earlier today. My home network was still up - it's just the router couldn't get an IP from the cable modem. During that period, my CentOS 5.1 install was extremely slow (2.6 GHz Athlon w/ 2GB ram) at starting non network applications - such as solitare and gnome terminal. It would pause for several seconds before finally starting them. The machine does