similar to: one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

Hi all, I set my sendmail.mc file to have a SMART_HOST entry of mail.xyz.com I do "make" and "service sendmail restart" ... I should be good, but no. :) If I do "host mail.xyz.com" I get the correct address and if I "telnet mail.xyz.com 25" I get a connection. however when I do a test mail - its trying to RELAY to another host. I thought SMART_HOST was

Hi All, I am 'trying' to set SMART_HOST in sendmail to point to smtp-relay.gmail.com but when looking at the /var/log/maillog its going to mx203.inbound-mx.net. [192.110.255.243], why??? my line from sendmail.mc define(`SMART_HOST', `smtp-relay.gmail.com') I did make in /etc/mail and service sendmail restart This is the only SMART_HOST in the config file. I started with the

I am trying to find a way to "speed" up sendmail going out of my box. I am setting SMART_HOST. Dont get me wrong email does go out it just takes like 3-4 minutes to get there. When I do "mail xxxx at y.com" and send it the /var/log/maillog file shows the connection and shows the relay as [127.0.0.1]. Then it just SITS there for a long time. Then it picks up the mail and

I am sending an email from my machine devcentos5x64. the transcript below (hangs for 60 seconds) at the line: MAIL From:<root at devcentos5x64.msgnet.com> SIZE=56 AUTH=root at devcentos5x64.msgnet.com The email succeeds - but I am trying to figure out the 60 second delay. Neither email server is busy. Nothing is waiting. the DNS on both machines point to the same nameserver. The DNS

I was getting MANY emails from XXX.hinet.net - kind of filled my mqueue directory. I stopped sendmail. removed all the files in mqueue, added to sendmail access a REJECT for hinet.net This certainly seems to help - but is that the correct way to take care of this sort of thing? Thanks, Jerry

Le 2015/09/30 17:32 +0200, Jerry Geis a ?crit: > Hi all, > > I set my sendmail.mc file to have a SMART_HOST entry of mail.xyz.com > I do "make" and "service sendmail restart" ... I should be good, but no. :) As explained by others, SMART_HOST is used for domains for which it has no information (basically, it can't find an MX or resolve the name). If you want

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > >>> >> In this case the secondary MX has the same RBL's etc etc as the primary. >> I do see the spammers sending their junk to the secondary more than the >> primary MX. Agree the secondary does not know the difference between >> valid and invalid addresses. >

Hi All, I'm just wanting to check that my understanding of the settings is correct as my web searches are finding a lot of dated information. If I want a Centos 6 sendmail system act as the secondary MX for domain bbbbb.co.uk do I just add a Connect:bbbbb.co.uk RELAY statement into /etc/mail/access and restart sendmail Obviously I have the DNS MX records for the domain are

Hey all, For the last 8 months I have been running a postfix / mail scanner setup based on Johnny Hughes' excellent tutorial. For the firs 7 months I have had no issues. This past month I have been having instances where the user gets an smtp error while trying to send email. Restarting the postfix service is all it takes to resolve this issue. The problem is that it has begun to occur

I have a problem getting spamd and sendmail (both stock CentOS4 rpms) to work together on a couple of smtp relay machines. This is clearly a configuration issue and no doubt revolves around my lack of comprehension of how this is to work. Basically, the setup consists of two frontend public smtp transports that redirect all email through a firewall to an internal imap server for final

On Fri, February 13, 2015 11:04 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Ken Smith <kens at kensnet.org> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm just wanting to check that my understanding of the settings is >> correct >> as my web searches are finding a lot of dated information. >> >> If I want a Centos 6 sendmail system act as the

Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >> still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never will come >> through backup MX. This is due to the

Dear All, Sorry if this is the wrong place for this question, or if I'm just being daft, but I can't get warnquota to send emails to the right address. When I put a test user (gollum) over quota, and run warnquota on a server (nfs2.lmb.internal), the email generated by warnquota appears in the maillog as "to=<gollum at nfs2.lmb.internal>," What I need is the email to

On Fri, February 13, 2015 11:52 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >> >> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >> still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never

Gents, I have added the following to /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and rebuilt it trying to control spam. I still get about 25 spam messages a day. Is there something else that can help control spam? Thanks jerry --------------------------- dnl # dnl # dnsbl - DNS based Blackhole List/Black List/Rejection list dnl # See http://www.sendmail.org/m4/features.html#dnsbl dnl # FEATURE(`dnsbl',

I have a stock CentOS 5 system as far as email (sendmail) is concerned that is on our corporate LAN. I am not trying to set up a mail server; I merely want our CentOS systems to be able to send out emails. This works as long as the recipient's domain is our local domain. Any email send to recipients that are not in our local domain get stuck in the queue: # mailq

I'm running centos on a "limited" environment. Is it ok to turn off sendmail and run without it. Are there issues with doing that or is all Ok. Thanks, Jerry

I am totally stumped here. I have setup a dovecot user and I can telnet to port 110 and login no problem with that user. When I try to send mail I get an error from sendmail: Mar 4 13:39:56 flashyhome sendmail[5014]: m24JdtGp005014: <paul at fleeky.com>... User unknown Now apparenly I need to setup the sendmail.mc file...which I have: MAILER(smtp)dnl MAILER(procmail)dnl MAILER(dovecot)

I have a sendmail question. Can someone point me to a list appropriate to get some sendmail.mc help?

On Fri, March 31, 2017 4:46 pm, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 03/31/2017 02:40 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: >> On 3/31/2017 2:15 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> Well, it sounds like you are one of the companies with whose effort I >>> have >>> to fight constantly in my own effort to protect our users from spam... >> >> What makes Postfix superior in fighting