similar to: Subversion server: v1.4 (centos) vs. v1.6 (rpmforge)

Apart from you were dialling out on your inbound context and vice-versa. The best advice I can give now is to change to mISDN - as this is proven to work with v1.4 and v1.6. Actually - have you tried putting the 100ohm termination on for your NT port? I need to do that with mISDN as it only allows ptmp for ISDN extensions. Cheers Andy -------------- next part

hola, tengo dos vectores de 1134 y 385 elementos que se corresponden con números de accesión de genes. Necesito saber que números son comunes o intersección de vectores. He utilizado intersect(x,y) y me da todo el rato un único valor: V1 V1.1 V1.2 V1.3 V1.4 V1.5 V1.6 V1.7 V1.8 V1.9 V1.10 V1.11 V1.12 1 AJ558305 AJ558305 AJ558305 AJ558305 AJ558305

Hello - I am upgrading from asterisk v1.2 to v1.6 and I am seeing a problem with recording CDRs using MySQL. Unlike all of the other postings and web pages I have found on this issue, my installation successfully stores the -first- CDR, but nothing after that. As background info, I will note that I don't use CDRs for billing, but more in a logging fashion, to record how a given call

Hi all, I am trying to isntall the v1.6 version of Asterisk on my Intrepid system, but I get an error after I have typed make: [CC] manager.c -> manager.o manager.c: In function ?action_getvar?: manager.c:1732: error: ?SENTINEL? undeclared (first use in this function) manager.c:1732: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once manager.c:1732: error: for each function it appears

The DAHDI docs actually include the 'steps' that used to be in Zaptel's 'make b410p'. These steps involve downloading and compiling mISDN. Why re-invent the wheel? Just a thought :-). As for the 100ohm termination bit - it's simply changing a couple of dip switches on the b410p card (as described in the manual). Andy -----Original Message----- From:

Hi All, Eagerly waiting for v1.4.x to mature a bit before getting serious about it. Is it ready for production yet? If that's too general, where is it in terms of stability compared to where 1.2.x is now. Anyone running it successfully in production environment and if so what sort of config do you have?

I have four database servers in a high-availability, load-balancing configuration. Each machine has a mount to a common data source which is an OCFS2 v1.4 file-system. While working on three of the servers, I restarted the IP network and found after-wards the fourth machine hung. I could not reboot and could not unmount the ocfs2 partitions. I am pretty sure this was all caused by my taking down

I wanted to install the rpmforge-release package on a new install and get the following. Do others have the same problem? b51:~ rpm -ivvvvvvvh http://packages.sw.be/rpmforge-release/rpmforge- release-0.3.6-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm Retrieving http://packages.sw.be/rpmforge-release/rpmforge-release-0.3.6- 1.el5.rf.i386.rpm D: ... as /var/tmp/rpm-xfer.qQEt9n D: failed to open

My brain must be on knots somehow. I try to install rsync 3.x, which I know is in rpmforge repo for my architecture: https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=22214 http://packages.sw.be/rsync/ But yum does not find it, however I try. I have installed yum-priorities. Rpmforge is low priority. But still... yum erase rsync # erase v2.6 from base repo yum --disablerepo=\*

Hi Is it possible to have rpmforge for both architectures? Currently is only for 64bit, but I need some libraries 32bit (rrdtool) to install ganglia. But if I try to install rpmforge i386, I got the message: [root at kitten01 mgarcia]# rpm -ivh rpmforge-release-0.3.6-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Mark <mhullrich at gmail.com> wrote: > I have an old version of rkhunter installed on my CentOS 5 machine, > one I got from rpmforge. > > In my most recent attempts to update this, I get the following errors in yum: > : > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > perl-AnyEvent-5.240-1.el5.rf.noarch from rpmforge has depsolving problems >

I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do not play well together and that if I use both, epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority. Alas I had it the other way around. rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity. I no longer need audacity, but would like to fix the situation before some other problem crops up. Would fixing the priorities and telling yum to reinstall all the

Hi, I am using the yum priorities plugin and, for some reason, it is blocking all rpmforge updates, even for already installed rpmforge packages... I have priority=1 for CentOS repos. Is it the 'normal' behavior or is something wrong in my conf? Thx, JD

[root at host ~]# yum clean all Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, protectbase Cleaning up Everything Cleaning up list of fastest mirrors [root at ost ~]# yum search libcli Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, protectbase Determining fastest mirrors * base: centos-distro.cavecreek.net * elrepo: elrepo.imt-systems.com * extras: ftp.ussg.iu.edu * rpmforge: apt.sw.be * updates: mirror.nandomedia.com base

hello folks! i've recently joined the rpmforge maintainers; given that Tim Brody has already written specfiles for RHEL4 and RHEL5, would you be interested in my adding the xapian packages to rpmforge? this would eliminate (or at least reduce) the need for you to maintain a separate repository and would mean that many users (those who have already configured their systems to pull

Hello, Tried yum update all yesterday and today and seems there is a perl dependency missing. Does anyone know if it is a problem or just a sync thing and that I should be more patient. Error is below: --> Processing Dependency: perl(Compress::Raw::Zlib) >= 2.020 for package: perl-IO-Compress --> Finished Dependency Resolution perl-IO-Compress-2.020-1.el5.rf.noarch from rpmforge has

Hi folks, Anyone know the whereabouts of libgtkembedmoz.so()(64bit) as it is needed by miro-1.0-1.el5.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge) I tried a whatprovides and have looked at epel as well as rpmforge - no luck. While I'm asking, I'm looking for an internet HD TV viewer - miro looked interesting - any other products you know of? TIA Rob -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment

Following Fabian's blog post re: RPMForge being rebuilt for EL5, I've a question: Are there any compatibility problems between RPMForge and EPEL? In other words, if I enabled EPEL previously, will I be able to enable RPMForge as well without running into trouble? -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/

I have an old version of rkhunter installed on my CentOS 5 machine, one I got from rpmforge. In my most recent attempts to update this, I get the following errors in yum: Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package perl-AnyEvent.noarch 0:5.240-1.el5.rf set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: perl(JSON::XS) >= 2.2 for package: perl-AnyEvent --> Processing

Dag in the thread about kvirc, I had pointed to dries repo, based on a list of repos I use *now*, that replaced your repo with rpmforge. This based on an instruction earlier that I should use rpmforge instead. So when I run my "yum --enablerepo=\* list...", it did not show your repo contents. Should I be including *both* rpmforge and dag? TIA Bill -------------- next part