similar to: XFS and LVM2 (possibly in the scenario of snapshots)

May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/ Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :) Cheers, Timo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi (Ralph), I'd like to edit my personal page (would be nice to link images from here to the interview); could you please grant me the appropriate permissions? TIA, Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLsf9cfg746kcGBOwRAqyOAKCL3MNTytzJQFwTZLlGZK8dosQ6bQCeM9Vc Nb1FSj82NIfv64MfY21MHy4= =KaiJ -----END PGP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I just did my daily news scan and saw some screenshots that illustrate the press release [0] announcing the first collisions at the LHC. Those screenshots show windows and buttons that exactly match my CentOS GNOME Desktop [1]. AFAIK, SuSE/Novell has different skins, as has (Open)Solaris and AIX, for instance. So, has there anybody more

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I have a weird (?) problem here on a setup running CentOS 5.3 x86_64 (and OpenVZ, and some home-brew L2TP daemons, RIPd, BGPd, etc). There's a (VE in OpenVZ speak) virtual machine that has two ethernet interfaces, seen as eth0 and eth1, respectively. Those live in VLANs, but it's not important here. The thing is that on eth1 the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Could anyone with the appropriate rights please create the C3-EOL page? Thanks in advance, Timo - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] EOL plans for C3 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:50:46 +0200 From: Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler at riscworks.net> To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel at centos.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'd like to translate the orignal page into a german one. http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSLiveCD5.5/German Could you (@Ralph) please create it? TIA Cheers, Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFL5+cIfg746kcGBOwRAiQVAJ9QdqD1Pdm5fVte59v7zBdStjWahgCdGDZa 59kYF9j2CQhbMfdH0Raunzo= =TL76

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There's progress... http://press.redhat.com/2010/10/18/red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-release-candidate-available-to-partners/ Cheers, Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFMvEWlfg746kcGBOwRAtHpAJ9/ylHRb8hAIBp4mvaNSPN36qrkzACfafrY 628MfhiRdSkK+9FWRuE8wJQ= =NtpF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 thus Karanbir Singh spake: > On 01/05/2011 04:03 PM, Timo Schoeler wrote: >> Sure, this is what I understand. However, does this exclude people >> willing to help (read: raising the manpower of the project rebuilding >> RHEL)? If so, yes, I misunderstood. >> > > Thats bonkers. There *was* a specific callout for help,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, a german IT news site [0] today posted that Amazon Linux AMI is based on CentOS 5.5 -- is that true? Maybe this would be stuff for the next newsletter... ;) Cheers, Timo http://www.golem.de/1009/78088.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFMl2Nxfg746kcGBOwRAg8sAKCelTvLYTNxVBjtOxteb7/hQY2eowCfYFzP

Hi list, just out of curiosity: Was anybody affected by this? http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2012-August/033611.html Cheers, Timo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, in May 2015 I reported [0] that I can not import my S/MIME certificate. Issuer is GlobalSign. Jan Horak reassigned it to the nss guys ("This seems to be problem in NSS code, reassigning to nss component"), but then the ticket idled and was eventually closed by EOL of Fedora 21 (though I stated it persists with F22). I just reopened

Hi list, due to the necessity of having a patched KVM running, I build some new RPMs. However, only kmod-kvm-83-105.27.x86_64.rpm is important to replace the 'original' one as it's the only package that contains the patch. I didn't rename the packages, though, hopefully in order not to break the upgrade path provided to us. The patch adresses following problem: 'Fix a race

Hello all, I am running VirtualBox 4.1 on CentOS 6 and I got this warning that putting your VM's into an XFS filesystem is risky. I have also heard some rumors on the net to this effect. Does anyone know in more detail what's behind those rumors? Thanks. Boris.

Hello guys Does anyone use lvm2 backends for domU storages ? I do and I wanted to use lvm''s snapshot feature to make backups of domUs in background but I got the following problem. When I create a snapshot LV and copy data from it to backup storage it works perfect. Then I do umount and then lvremove. lvremove asks me if I really want to remove the volume and then just hangs forever.

Hi all. We just put a relative large server in operation (for our measures ;-) ), a 4x Dual Core / Intel with 16GB Ram and a 3ware 9550SX SATA-RAID with 4 drives. Operating system for the Dom0 is an up-to-date gentoo linux. Everything runs really fine, there are 4 Domu''s running, 1x gentoo and 2x debian and 1x Windows Server 2003. DomU''s are running blazing fast in normal

Thank you for your help. Le 05/01/2015 19:10, John R Pierce a ?crit : > works here fine on the 9261, which is an OEM version of the same card > with the connectors in a different orientation... you might check your > LSI firmware revision. My firmware seems to be more up to date. Anyway, I will try to update firmware. I have to check how to do that. # dmesg |grep LSI scsi4 : LSI SAS

From a buddy of mine that has spent a little time with the new cards. This was in response to my email asking about his impressions of them: It just came out in mid-September. There are a couple reasons I'm not thrilled with it: 1) no 8-port multilane version (only 12) 2) the 8-port non-multilane version is a kludge, connector-wise (a row of 3 double-stacked connectors along the

Greetings, I am looking for a hardware raid card that supports up to 4 SATA II hard disks with hot swap (compatible raid cage) I have short listed two LSI/3Ware cards: 1. 9750-4i 2. 9650SE-4LPML Both appear to be well supported in Linux. I would appreciate your personal experience with the CLI tools provided by LSI. Can they be configured to send email for disk failures or SMART errors? Is

On 29 August 2007, "Ross S. W. Walker" <rwalker at medallion.com> wrote: > Message: 39 <snip> > I wouldn't worry too much about the OS HD configuration, you are > always going to want RAID1 for the OS, whether software or hardware. > > Reason I say not to worry too much about the OS HD config is because > you are almost certainly going to put the

With all the recent discussion of SSD''s that lack suitable power-failure cache protection, surely there''s an opportunity for a separate modular solution? I know there used to be (years and years ago) small internal UPS''s that fit in a few 5.25" drive bays. They were designed to power the motherboard and peripherals, with the advantage of simplicity and efficiency