similar to: NetworkManager constantly overwriting /etc/resolve.conf - how to disable?

Hello, On my systems I have after update to last centos 1810 a big Problem with the network?? Om my system I have three NIC two are connected from hardware (hostdev) the last is connected from the bridge on the host. (NetworkManager was disabled) Now after the update the client can't start the NIC's correctly :-( My Problem is the bridged NIC ethX I must Install and activate the

> On 11/17/18 8:31 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> On 11/17/2018 07:01 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> On 11/17/2018 06:43 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>>> CentOS 7.5 image running on linode. >>>> >>>> unbound running on localhost. >>>> >>>> Have to use a cron job once a minute to keep /etc/resolv.conf using >>>> the

On my CentOS 6 partition of my laptop: First note that for this test, NetworkManager is not running because I did: chkconfig --del NetworkManager and then rebooted. Here is my ifcfg-eth0: DEVICE="eth0" NM_CONTROLLED="no" ONBOOT=no HWADDR=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx TYPE=Ethernet BOOTPROTO=none IPADDR=192.168.2.5 PREFIX=24 GATEWAY=192.168.2.1 DNS1=192.168.2.1 DNS2=192.168.2.1

Hi, I'm running CentOS 7 on all my servers, in three different contexts : 1. simple local server 2. public facing server 3. router/gateway/firewall I'm currently in the process of moving my KISS-style network-scripts-style configurations to something more orthodox based on NetworkManager. Scenarios (1) and (2) caused no problems, but (3) is giving me some headache. Let me

Le 18/02/2020 ? 12:28, Anand Buddhdev a ?crit?: > Neither. The DNS configuration should not normally be bound to a > specific interface, so don't configure it with any interface. If you do, > and that interface goes down, your DNS config also disappears. I would like to do that very much, only NetworkManager makes you jump through burning loops to do so. With network-scripts, it

Hi, I am facing issue stoping NetworkManager to update resolv.cfg, I am using below configuration for eth0 interface: TYPE=Ethernet BOOTPROTO=dhcp DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no IPV6INIT=yes IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no IPV6_ADDR_GEN_MODE=stable-privacy NAME=eth0 UUID=93b90a46-dab5-4a67-8fd0-fefe8874a8b9 DEVICE=eth0 ONBOOT=no PEERDNS=no PEERROUTES=yes

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi at softdux.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:49 AM, compdoc <compdoc at hotrodpc.com> wrote: >> I love realtek - the resources they use tend not to conflict with other >> cards or hardware, they don't use much cpu time, the drivers are mature, and >> they don't cost much. What could be better? There

Le 18/02/2020 ? 17:43, Jonathan Billings a ?crit?: > According to 'man nm-settings-ifcfg-rh', PEERDNS=no is the old > network-services services mechanism for not changing /etc/resolv.conf, > while in NM it just means never add automatic nameservers to > resolv.conf from DHCP, PPP, VPN, etc. Turning off all DNS > updates means adding: > > [main] > dns=none >

On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 06:51:44PM -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: > I've chacked on that. > I've made what seemed like promissing changes to > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-post and > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/network-functions . > No go. > I still get the search line in resolv.conf . > I've tried putting in search google.com , > but on reboot, it

Hi, I'm running CentOS on all kinds of setups: servers, workstations, desktops and laptops. Up until now, I'm only using NetworkManager on laptops, since it makes sense to use it there. On servers and desktop clients, I usually remove it and configure the network "traditionally" by simply editing /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-whatever, /etc/resolv.conf, /etc/hosts,

Is anyone frustrated by Network Manager? I wish CentOS just used the basic configuration files like the ones on BSD-style OSes. Those are so simple in comparison. Each time I reboot, it seems like the configuration file I create for Network Manager gets destroyed and replaced with a default file. Nothing in the default file would actually make sense on my network, so I'm not even really sure

> The recommended configuration for EL7 is to use NetworkManager unless > you have a very specific edge case preventing you from doing so: > The truth is a lot of us run servers that don't need to have their network "managed" by Networkmanager. We just need to set an IP address, subnet mask, gateway, and DNS servers and we will never be changing that configuration ever

Hi, I'm looking for a firewall (preferably on Linux / UNIX) that could automatically block bandwidth abusers as soon as a connection goes over a certain speed, or limit - i.e. either more than say 3Mb/s or 10GB in a giving period (like weekly / monthly). But, I need it to block the IP to, or where the traffic comes from, or goes to. i.e. a user logs into a web server and upload a LOT of

I have been *manually* dealing with my wired and wireless network interfaces on my laptop. I have a pair of config files (in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/: ifcfg-eth0 (wired: Intel Corporation 82540EP Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Mobile)) and ifcfg-eth1 (wireless: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless LAN 2100 3B Mini PCI Adapter), both with USERCTL=true (and ifcfg-eth0 also has ONBOOT=true). I have

Dear Simon, every second IP-address is unwanted. We restarted? eno4: nmcli con down eno4; nmcli con up eno4 and the second address vanishes. Then after a few ours, the second ip address reappears. This is the config-file of eno2: # cat ifcfg-eno2 TYPE=Ethernet PROXY_METHOD=none BROWSER_ONLY=no BOOTPROTO=none DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes IPV6INIT=no IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes

We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out to the site, where they just plug it in, turn it on, and walk away. That?s the ideal, anyway. What often happens in reality is either: 1. They give us incorrect static IP info,

On Dec 1, 2014, at 10:27 PM, Rob Kampen <rkampen at reaching-clients.com> wrote: > Have you put > NM_CONTROLLED="no" > in the ifcfg-eth0 script? How is that better than systemctl stop NetworkManager systemctl disable NetworkManager Again, I?m not really after a way to make this work without NetworkManager. We?ve already got that. What I want is a way to tell

Hi all If I do a "dig mydomain.co.za" from a Linux server, how do I know which DNS nameserver returns the queries? I seem to have a faulty DNS server, but can't see which one, so I want to find out which nameserver (if there's 4 - ns1.myserver, ns2.myserver, ns3.myserver & ns4.myserver) returns the queries? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Web:

Hello, I changed ISPs and need to update name servers in resolv.conf. I have tried nano, gedit, Webmin, system-config-network and it won't allow me to make the changes. I have Network Manager turned off and when I enable it , eth0 and eth1 have no entries. I enabled it, added the connections, but still no changes. I'm stuck TIA

given machine with C6 x86_64 (seen on C 6.6 but also before and probably still present on C6.7) only 1 interface, there is dhcp on this network (for kickstarting) but the machines have static ip's, and NO networkmanager installed contents of resolv.conf search some.domain.here nameserver x.x.x.x #dns1 nameserver y.y.y.y #dns2 change resolv.conf to: search some.newdomain.here nameserver