similar to: Is there a CentOS selinux mailing list?

CentOS 6.3. *Just* updated, including most current selinux-policy and selinux-policy-targeted. I'm getting tons of these, as in it's just spitting them out when I tail -f /var/log/messages: Sep 13 15:20:51 <server> setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from search access on the directory @2. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l d92ec78b-3897-4760-93c5-343a662fec67

CentOS-6.5 OpenDKIM-2.9.0 (epel) Postfix-2.6.6 (updates) I am trying to get opendkim working with our mailing lists. In the course of that endeavour I note that these messages are appearing in our syslog: May 4 20:50:02 inet08 setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/opendkim from using the signull access on a process. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l

I seem to have quieted some, but I'm still getting noise from selinux. Here's one that really puzzles me: my users have a ruby app with passenger running. However, one of the sealerts gives me: sealert -l 5a02b0a1-8512-4f71-b1c8-70a40b090a9d SELinux is preventing /bin/chmod from using the fowner capability. ***** Plugin catchall_boolean (89.3 confidence) suggests *******************

OK, so setup CENTOS-5 on a laptop to learn about Xen stuff. KDE Desktop, wanted to print the virt.108.com xen howto. Needed to setup printer first. Open KDE control center, go to printers. Hear error sound, message says "Unable to retrieve the printer list.... Connection to CUPS server failed. ..." So I check to see that cups is running (it is). I check /var/log/messages

Hi all, On my newly up-and-running nameserver (CentOS 5), I noticed the following alerts in /var/log/messages after restarting BIND. (lines inserted to aid in reading). As I'm new to SELinux, I'm hoping for some pointers on 1) if this is an issue which simply *must* be addressed, or if it's something I should live with, and 2) how to eliminate the warming messages without sacrificing

Applied policy update. Now I see these occasionally. But by the time I try and see what the matter is the file is gone: /var/log/maillog . . . Dec 9 15:12:08 inet08 postfix/smtp[3670]: fatal: shared lock active/0A7EC60D8A: Resource temporarily unavailable . . . Dec 9 15:12:08 inet08 postfix/smtp[3758]: fatal: shared lock active/8DD5060F81: Resource temporarily unavailable . . . Dec 9 15:12:09

As this remains an issue for me, I'm reposting. Please forgive the redundancy, but I've been unable to find the answer and am hoping for some guidance. Thanks in advance, ~Ray ==========Original Posts follow========== (full output is in the original thread) Ray Leventhal wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On my newly up-and-running nameserver (CentOS 5), I noticed the >

Dear my friends... Anybody would be so nice for telling me the solution of my problem. My Apache2 can not start. I find this error in /var/log/messages: Nov 7 14:20:47 cencen setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing httpd from loading /usr/local/apache/modules/libphp5.so which requires text relocation. For complete SELinux messages. run Realertrag -l 077ac3bc-5f20-4954-99c3-a754f9cd7df2 I've

Following a hard drive corruption I have reinstalled the latest version of CentOS and all current patch files. For most applications I selected the default options. By doing this I expected that the packages would play nice with one another and I could customize as necessary. Setting SELinux to enforce I encountered all sorts of problems - but most were resolvable, save for Dovecot,

Hi, I'm running CentOS 7 on an Internet-facing server. SELinux is in permissive mode for debugging. I've removed FirewallD and replaced it with a custom-made Iptables script. I've also installed and configured Fail2ban (fail2ban-server package) to protect the server from brute force attacks. Out of the box, Fail2ban doesn't seem to play well with SELinux. Here's what I

On 12/28/2016 03:32 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: > > On 28/12/16 20:11, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> On 12/28/2016 01:53 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> On 12/28/2016 05:11 AM, Todor Petkov wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> >>>>> wrote:

Hi Guys, My google foo is failing me this afternoon. Just configuring a new C6 install. I know there are SELinux alerts happening, eg: I know I need to enable named to write to the local .jnl file as part of dynamic DNS, but sealert -b is not listing any alerts. I can see raw audit messages. Is there some daemon I have forgotten to start or install? Thanks Ken -- This message has been

On 28/12/16 21:24, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >> On 12/28/2016 03:32 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: >>> >>> On 28/12/16 20:11, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> >>>> On 12/28/2016 01:53 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>>> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>>>> On 12/28/2016 05:11 AM,

On 12/28/16, 3:09 PM, "CentOS on behalf of Robert Moskowitz" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: On 12/28/2016 06:05 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: > > On 28/12/16 21:24, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> >>> On 12/28/2016 03:32 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: >>>> On 28/12/16 20:11,

CentOS-6.1 KVM guest on CentOS-6.1 host. I am seeing this SEAlert in the /var/log/audit/audit.log file a new guest immediately after startup. Can someone tell me what it means and what I should do about it? A Google search reveals a number of Fedora issues with similar errors dating back a few years; most of which seem to have something to do with package ownership. This guest starts without

Hi, I just installed SpamAssassin on two servers running CentOS 7 and Postfix. One is my sandbox server for experimenting, the other one is the server that hosts my company's web site, blog, mail, etc. So far, SpamAssassin seems to work as expected. I sent a test mail, which was duly flagges as [SPAM], and I already see the odd incoming spam message correctly flagged as [SPAM]. For testing

On 12/28/16, 3:28 PM, "CentOS on behalf of Robert Moskowitz" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: On 12/28/2016 06:13 PM, Greg Cornell wrote: > On 12/28/16, 3:09 PM, "CentOS on behalf of Robert Moskowitz" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > > > On 12/28/2016 06:05 PM, J

I'll jump in here to say we'll try your suggestion, but I guess what's not been mentioned is that we get the setroubleshoot abrt's only a few times a day, but we're getting 10000s of setroubleshoot messages in /var/log/messages a day. e.g. Dec 2 10:03:55 server audispd: queue is full - dropping event Dec 2 10:04:00 server audispd: last message repeated 199 times Dec 2

I hadn't paid attention when one or two folks recently posted this, but it's hit us, also: $ sealert -l d1655210-f43c-4737-98dc-86b6aac82bb6 Entity: line 53: parser error : Input is not proper UTF-8, indicate encoding ! Bytes: 0x99 0x3C 0x2F 0x74 <tpath>`</tpath> ^ failed to connect to server: xmlParseDoc() failed I tried reinstalling

Mark: Labels look OK, restorecon has nothing to do, and: -rwxr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /bin/ps dr-xr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:proc_t:s0 /proc I'll send the audit log on to Dan. Cheers, John On 2 December 2014 at 16:10, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com> wrote: > Could you send me a copy of your audit.log. > > You should not be