similar to: no valid partitiontables anymore

Hi Folks, I search for a way to mount the .img files virt-install creates for Xen VMs. Using fdisk -lu I found it contains to 2 partitions: > # fdisk -lu /var/lib/xen/images/BaseCentos.img > last_lba(): I don't know how to handle files with mode 81ed > Sie m?ssen angeben Zylinder. > Sie k?nnen dies im Zusatzfunktionsmen? tun. > > Platte /var/lib/xen/images/BaseCentos.img:

Hello all, I' ve got a strange problem since I' ve installed the latest version of Samba. My configuration: Hardware- & Software-Configuration: Server-OS: AIX 4.3.0.0 Samba-Version: 2.0.5 Clients: WindowsNT Workstation 4.0 SP 5 and AutoCAD Version 14 Every Application I'm using is coping very fine with the new Samba-Version, but AutoCAD behaves a little strange! When I open a

Hi again, I have the following scenario: I've got a partition which has exactly 14659312 blocks: $ fdisk -l /dev/hda Disk /dev/hda: 28.5 GB, 28520497152 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3467 cylinders Units = Zylinder of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Ger?t Boot Start End Blocks Id System (...) /dev/hda4 1643 3467 14659312+ 83 Linux (...)

Hello again, I ancounter another problem. When a user logs in with a Windows XP Prof. machine he can't delete the file/folder again. He can add a file/folder and can do everything with it but but not delete it again. Not even a view to the seetings is possible (all "right-click" things don't work). When the user uses a Windows 2000 machine he can do everything just fine (create,

I am familiar with centos and this forum, and have some rhel / centos questions. Therefore I'm asking the question here I am about to install rhel4.5 on a hp dl380 with 4 disc's. The standard rhel installation installers all in one partition? Will there be any advantage of splitting the file system up? What would be a good recommended partition table for a server running scripts

I have a USB key that when inserted into a port on my CentOS-6.5 system maounts as this: /dev/sdb1 /media/22d773e3-8502-4196-b45f-388380dcee48 ext2 rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=udisks 0 0 What is the mechanism to give this thing a more human usable mount name / volume name? Mounting this USB key with what I guess is a UUID in place of a name was not always the case. My sense is that the change in

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6576 Summary: generate_files lists non-existent files Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: stlman at poczta.fm

Hello Joenes, below you find the output. I did not shorten it by tmpfs and the docker related entries. Are you working on fixing the Issue I described? Regards, Hendrik df -TPh Dateisystem Typ Gr??e Benutzt Verf. Verw%

BLS #rsync --version rsync version 3.0.4pre2 protocol version 30 Copyright (C) 1996-2008 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/ Capabilities: 64-bit files, 64-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, ACLs, xattrs, iconv, symtimes rsync comes with ABSOLUTELY NO

Hi all, I have two centos 5.4 servers that I use to run several windows kvm guests (10). All works ok (more or less) but I have a problem with backups. These windows guests are configured to use lvm partitions as a virtual disks. My problem is when I need to do guests backups. which is the best form to backup and restore these windows guests? Some examples? I see snapshot's lvm

Hi, When I upgraded my cluster, df started returning some odd numbers for my legacy volumes. Newly created volumes after the upgrade, df works just fine. I have been researching since Monday and have not found any reference to this symptom. "vm-images" is the old legacy volume, "test" is the new one. [root at st-srv-03 ~]# (df -h|grep bricks;ssh st-srv-02 'df -h|grep

I recently received an 8GB usb stick that fails to mount on my fully patched CentOS 6.5 desktop machine. The stick works just fine on a windoze 7 laptop (my daughter's) with no special drivers installed. fdisk -l /dev/sdf gives the following: Disk /dev/sdf: 8004 MB, 8004829184 bytes 102 heads, 38 sectors/track, 4033 cylinders Units = cylinders of 3876 * 512 = 1984512 bytes Sector size

rsync -rltpcvxH --progress --delete /mnt/sdf1/dvd . .... lots of stuff works, but then.... .... dvd/setdir/www/web_admin-1.0-noarch-001.tgz 1306806 100% 3.34MB/s 0:00:00 (xfer#927, to-check=1004/2734) dvd/setdir/xlibs/ deleting dvd/setdir/xlibs/gstreamer-0.10.21-i586-001.tgz deleting dvd/setdir/xlibs/gst_plugins_base-0.10.21-i586-001.tgz

It's already mounted rw somewhere else. This enables the needs_recovery feature which prevents an ext2 mount. -Leslie -----Original Message----- From: Christopher J. PeBenito [mailto:pebenito@ieee.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 11:30 AM To: kuczynski, leslie Cc: 'ext3-users@redhat.com' Subject: Re: ext3 "noload" option to mount returning error in 2.4.9 & 2.4.18 s

Because you need to separate the instructions with a ; (semi-colon). Hope this helps Rui Barradas Enviado a partir do meu smartphone Samsung Galaxy.-------- Mensagem original --------De: Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> Data: 08/01/2018 16:03 (GMT+00:00) Para: Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us>, r-help at r-project.org Assunto: Re: [R] Replace NAs in split lists Thank you

Hello I have a CentOS 6.6 Server with 13 disks in a RAID 6. Some weeks ago, i upgraded it to 17 disks, two of them configured as spare. The reshape worked like normal in the beginning. But at 69% it stopped. md2 : active raid6 sdj1[0] sdg1[18](S) sdh1[2] sdi1[5] sdm1[15] sds1[12] sdr1[14] sdk1[9] sdo1[6] sdn1[13] sdl1[8] sdd1[20] sdf1[19] sdq1[16] sdb1[10] sde1[17](S) sdc1[21] 19533803520

Running on a up-to-date CentOS 5.6 x86_64 machine: [heller at ravel ~]$ uname -a Linux ravel.60villagedrive 2.6.18-238.19.1.el5 #1 SMP Fri Jul 15 07:31:24 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux with a TYAN Computer Corp S4881 motherboard, which has a nVidia 4 channel SATA controller. It also has a Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SX7042 PCI-e 4-port SATA-II (rev 02). This machine has a 120G

I have an ext3 filesystem that I want to mount without loading the journal. I tried the "noload" option with both 2.4.9 and 2.4.18 series kernels and get the errors listed below. [root@host]# mount -t ext3 -o noload /dev/sdf1 /mnt mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdf1, or too many mounted file systems /var/log/messages: Apr 18 13:30:23 host kernel: ext3:

I have an ext3 filesystem that I want to mount without loading the journal. I tried the "noload" option with both 2.4.9 and 2.4.18 series kernels and get the errors listed below. [root@host]# mount -t ext3 -o noload /dev/sdf1 /mnt mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdf1, or too many mounted file systems /var/log/messages: Apr 18 13:30:23 host kernel: ext3:

Dear list, i have installed SQLiteDF (and SQlite 3.5.3 too) After the suggested dataframe generation iris.sdf <- sqlite.data.frame(iris) i have close R and than restart it for verify the correct load of dataframe : the file data1 is saved in the usual folder .SQLiteDF after the command : attachSdf("c:/R/Report/.SQLiteDF/data1.db","iris.sdf") R give this error