similar to: combining iptables parameters

Hi There, I've been having an issue trying to figure out a way to policy route outbound packets from a multihomed machine through the proper interface using IPFW to no avail. I've tried several different incantations of IPFW fwd/forward statements, and none of them seem to do the trick. Basically, I have a host that has multiple Internet connections. This host is running FreeBSD 4.9

Dear All. I want to use 'not' for 2 addresses (for both) in ipfw2 rule. The only way that looks like what I need is # ipfw add count from IP1 to not IP2,IP3 But does this rule indeed makes what I want? Does it count all packets destined to addresses other then IP2 AND IP3?! No other syntax works. For example more logically correct not IP2 AND not IP3 or even not { IP2 or IP3 } are

I have a simple script: #!/bin/bash # index=0 total=0 names=() ip=() while read -r LINE do NODENAME=` echo $LINE | cut -f 1 -d ','` IP=` echo $LINE | cut -f 2 -d ','` names[index]="$NODENAME" ip[index]="$IP" index=`expr index+1` total=`expr total+1` done <<< $(cat list.txt) simple file: more list.txt name1,ip1 name2,ip2 name3,ip3 output when

hy Hope everyone is fine, I have one issue coming in asterisk , What i am doing is i am generating a callback if some one calls at a specif access number on asterisk, Asterisk sends a busy signal to the calling party that he received a request from party and then sends the call back to the person from where asterisk received a request but in From field as you can see below astrisk is sending the

Hello I have a PC with 2 IPs publics IP1 in eth0 and IP2 in eth0:0 I want to do a redirection of IP2 to an other public IP IP3 in an other laptop (other network) - for all ports : IP2 ---> IP3 - for juste www : IP2:www --> IP3:www i tried many combination with shorewall-3.0.7-4, but no sucess no help from google, Thanks in advance Laurent

Hi All, I''m a big user of the LARTC document but am currently stuck with a question around section 4.2 (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) in relation to "Routing for multiple uplinks/providers". I''m wanting to do a similar setup to the diagram where I have - lets just say for the moment - two uplink providers where I want to route over two

HI All , I am running a FC6 box with two internet links with load balance . Every thing is working fine expect the MSN connection that failed and reconnect every time and SSL connections . I would link to know if with the nona howto I could fix that . I have been tried with no success to redirect that connection only to one link but its look like do not work . Here my configuration :

Hi, this might be a dumb question, but I''m not finding much information online. I''m trying to setup a 2.6 linux box to run nat across multiple upstream links as a simple way to aggregate bandwidth. I found the instructions in lartc section 4.2 (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) fairly clear and straightforward. I implemented those, and a couple of trivial

Hi all, I''ve a routing problem. I''m setting up a router based on debian (kernel 2.4). I need to setup routing to export an ftp service (ftp server is in dmz) to 2 wan (both). I setup prerouting ad forward rule with no problem. The problem is that reply packet use default gateway (default wan) even though they are enter using the other wan. I solved it marking packets in input

Hi, I have a little problem to setup iproute in my network It looks like this: ---- ----- ------ R1 R2 R3 ---- ----- ------ | | | | | | ------------------------------- ETH1 ETH2 ETH3 ETH0 ETH4 -------------> DMZ ------------------------------ | |

Hi Everybody in the list I have a situation like this ------ (IP1) linux |----eth0.40------ | router | | | box | (IP2) |------|Client Router ( Destiantion Net DNET) |----eth0.41------ | | /27 subnet ------ I just want to balance the load of bandwidth per packet based between the two vlan interfaces to Client Destination network

Hi, i''m a shorewall users and i have the following problem: I have one class C range of IP''s and i have three zones (net, dmz , loc) I need create one rule to dnat one valid ip address (but not in use in one computer) to one invalid host in my loc zone. How i do? I try this: DNAT net:200.200.200.200 dmz:200.193.137.38 tcp 137,138,139,445 -

Am 29.07.24 um 14:35 schrieb Zhuchenko Valery via samba: > user may be same, but from client ip1 this user can't see shares, which > can see from client ip2. > need share enumeration by client ip Have you checked if "hosts allow" in combination with "access based share enum" does what you want?

hi all, we were trying to configure our system with 2 ethernet catds connected to two different providers using iproute2 so that it recieves and transmits data from both of them. We have followed the configuration as given on lartc''s howto But the most wierd part of the story is that after we restart the system (We have put the script in rc.local) the system works fine and we can ping

Hi, At office, we have I ISPs. I want to lightly monitor each link latency in order to decide several routing. For that, I have only one external server: 1 IP, it's an OVH dedicated server. The quick picture is http://s24.postimg.org/n3436z64l/defaul_route.png Default route is via ISP1. If OVH-server pings IP1: - the request will go through ISP1: it's OK - the reply will go through

Hello all, I have a linux router with 2 interfaces(eth0 - ISP and eth1 - LAN). I''ve established a VPN connection(openvpn) over eth0 with a friend of mine => tun0 interface. I want half of my LAN to have Internet access through the eth0 interface and the other half through the tun0 interface. I''ve set up a script like the "load balancing split access" instructions

Hi, I have a router that got its second link. I was trying to do load balancing, but i can not get it to work properly. Just one link works at time, and is always the second in the command ip route add default table 222 proto static. Am I missing something? My script is below. I am using Debian, tried with kernel 2.6.19 (my compilation) or debian''s one (2.6.18-3-486), same results

I have both cable and dsl service. The router attached to the cable service is 192.168.0.1 and the router attached to the dsl service is 192.168.0.254. I determine which service my computers communicate through by setting the gateway assignment to either of those addresses and it just works. I can connect to my computers from the outside by port forwarding from my routers to the computer that I

i´ve been searching for a load balance solution since a month ago... what i can say is that it simply doesn´t work. I was unable to find one guy that did it with sucess. When "load balance" is the subject of the message on the list, the message is simply ignored. So... if it doesn´t work... why LARTC don´t delete it from the HOW TO and answer us with some "it simply doesn´t

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Vonau" <jvonau@shaw.ca> To: "Mailing List for Shorewall Users" <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 08:06 Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Two Links and DNAT > > > > Btw, by "shorewall show nat" I just noticed that I was doing snat only > > for packets comming