similar to: Missing yum-priorities in 5.4?

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:03:07AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:39:12PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > When we receive a new packet from the guest, we check if the > > src_cid is correct, but we forgot to check the dst_cid. > > > > The host should accept only packets where dst_cid is > > equal to the host CID. > > >

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:03:07AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:39:12PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > When we receive a new packet from the guest, we check if the > > src_cid is correct, but we forgot to check the dst_cid. > > > > The host should accept only packets where dst_cid is > > equal to the host CID. > > >

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 07:56:26AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 01:36:24PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:03:07AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:39:12PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > > When we receive a new packet from the guest, we check if the > > >

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:38 AM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco at xs4all.nl> wrote: > > Hi all, > Hi Hans. > The patches in this series can be applied independently from each other. > > If you maintain one of these drivers and you want to merge it for v5.4 > yourself, then please do so and let me know. If you prefer I commit it > to drm-misc, then please review and

Hello, I have the following data frame (DF): V5 V5.1 V5.2 V5.3 V5.4 V5.5 2 -5890.18905 -6019.84665 -6211.06545 -6198.9353 -6616.8677 -6498.7183 3 -5890.18905 -6019.84665 -6211.06545 -6198.9353 -6616.8677 -6498.7183 4 -5890.18905 -6019.84665 -6211.06545 -6198.9353 -6616.8677 -6498.7183 5 -5890.18905 -6019.84665 -6211.06545 -6198.9353 -6616.8677

When we receive a new packet from the guest, we check if the src_cid is correct, but we forgot to check the dst_cid. The host should accept only packets where dst_cid is equal to the host CID. Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare at redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c

When we receive a new packet from the guest, we check if the src_cid is correct, but we forgot to check the dst_cid. The host should accept only packets where dst_cid is equal to the host CID. Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare at redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c

Hi Dariusz, Hans, I can apply the dw-hdmi patches if necessary. Neil On 19/08/2019 11:38, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi all, > > The patches in this series can be applied independently from each other. > > If you maintain one of these drivers and you want to merge it for v5.4 > yourself, then please do so and let me know. If you prefer I commit it > to drm-misc, then please

from [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone? > Is that a big problem for the people who write the code and have every > revision preserved for posterity (and for others to learn from) in a > public revision control system? > I'm not sure that I understand. Is there indeed such a public repository of the build scriptds / RPM specs used by CentOS? That would indeed be fascinating and useful

Hi gang, Was wondering how the beta 2 was going? Last I heard was end a january? Is there a new "projected" date? I did see the RHEL5 beta 2 was actually available for download without a subscription. Thanks, looking forward to playing with CENTOS 5 beta 2. Jerry

hi friends, maybe you could help me with following problem: We have one SuperMicro dual xenon machine running Centos 4.3 ia32 version and we have problem with reboting this machine remotely (command reboot from ssh connection). After upgrade to kernel versions 2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp and 2.6.9-34.0.2.ELsmp the machine hangs right after the: md: md0 switched to read-only mode. message and does not

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos at br-online.de<ra%2Bcentos at br-online.de> > wrote: > Michael St. Laurent wrote: > > > > Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3? > > > > > > > > > > > he....did....not....ask...this.... > > > > > > search the forums..when it's done..unless you

Hi, I'm looking for some documentation (or advice) on how to best manage a -mostly- upstream binary compatible CentOS installation. I enabled the rpmforge repository in order to install a few packages not available in base/updates/centosplus. But, now when I do a "yum check-update" yum wants to update a whole stack of packages because it's found newer versions at

...of a shell script for rsync that won't start again if it is already running? I thought of using a lock file, but what if it is killed mid script or bombs? -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!!

Hi everyone, I am looking for a dedicated server with CentOS. Any recommendations? Ideally I would like to use one of the CentOS sponsors, but I think that there are far too many to be able to compare them all by refreshing (maybe there is a page with just a list of links to sponsors but I couldn't find it). Thanks Gabriel ___________________________________________________________

This series updates DRM drivers to use new CEC notifier API. Changes since v6: Made CEC notifiers' registration and de-registration symmetric in tda998x and dw-hdmi drivers. Also, accidentally dropped one patch in v6 (change to drm_dp_cec), brought it back now. Changes since v5: Fixed a warning about a missing comment for a new member of drm_dp_aux_cec struct. Sending to a wider

Hi, I am running two node active/passive cluster running Centos3 update 8 64 bit on Hp Box with external hp storage connected via scsi. My cluster was running fine for last 3 years.But all of a sudden cluster service keep on shifting (atleast one time in a day )form one node to another. After analysed the syslog i found that due to some network fluctuation service was getting shifted.Both

I'm pretty new to the task of upgrading CentOS or RedHat o.s.'s. I'm more familiar with upgrading Debian based o.s.'s. Here are my questions: 1) will yum ever upgrade the major version? I understand that there is no upgrade path from v5.x to v6.x, but is that always the case? e.g. was there an upgrade path from v4.x -> v5.x? If yum is capable of doing so, what are the

Hi friends, My company is currently using Exchange Servers for Mail Server solutions but now they want to move to Linux Servers due to heavy cost involved with the Exchange Users.We will be using the latest version of Centos. So the kind of solution we are looking is below: a) Postfix or Sendmail as MTA. b) Dovecot or Cyrus Imap with Quota as Pop & Imap server. c) Security of Maildir means

Any news on this? Will we see a POWER version of CentOS 5? -- //Morten Torstensen //Email: morten at mortent.org //IM: Cartoon at jabber.no morten.torstensen at gmail.com And if it turns out that there is a God, I don't believe that he is evil. The worst that can be said is that he's an underachiever.