similar to: Calling all Hackers

I created a client library to send emails for a webapp. After connecting to the SMTP server with credential setup in CPANEL, and then do NOT add Message-Id header, the DKIM signature 'h' record created by dovecot/WHM is wrong, and a Message-ID (with a capital D) header is added, invalidating the generated DKIM signature value. This causes outlook, yahoo, gmail and other email

Hello, Anyone running cpanel on CentOS3.4, could you please tell me what you see at the top right corner of your WHM, where the version numbers are listed? Do you have "RedHat Enterprise 3 i686" like on RHEL or is cpanel aware that it''s CentOS? Thanks, Francois

Hello, I need to conduct a little research. Anyone who is running CentOS 5.3 x86_64 please run the following: # yum install libxml2-devel # nm /usr/lib64/libxml2.a | grep xmlXPathContextSetCache If my suspicions are correct, if you run cPanel/WHM you will not see any output and if without cPanel/WHM you'll see something similar to this: 00000000000023a0 T xmlXPathContextSetCache Thanks

I am pretty much a newbie at CentOS, and Linux on client side, I would like to help out occasionally by helping the web development crew in their endeavors and by sorting out some stuff. such as repairing broken links, or just scanning for content and maybe even doing a little bit of consulting. Eric R. Clark Dynamic Technology Systems US Phone: (817) 704-4109 US Cell: (817) 706-8856 Email is

I'm trying to get nessus setup for doing some internal security checking. I installed the ports for nessus and nessus-plugins, and everything worked as expected. I then registered for the full feed of plugins, which got me up to over 10,000 plugins. I restarted nessus, and it didn't work at all. I am running without X11, so I'm doing batch runs. I already have nmap installed, so I

System: Icecast 2.4.1 and 2.4.2, OS: CentOS 6.6 x64 Tried to install icecast using following two different methods described in these links: (1) http://www.ukhost4u.co.uk/blog/538/install-icecast-2-centos-6-server/ (2) https://www.servint.net/university/article/taking-the-chill-out-of-installing-icecast/ Both of these resulted in working and stable icecast, but without the possibility of url

Hi Ryan, I am not authenticating to any Windows server, I just have the samba server itself set up with 3 users who an login. ...Paul Ryan Frantz wrote: >Paul, > >Are you using a Windows PDC or ADS to authenticate your Samba shares? >If so, the problem would not be with Samba, but with the authenticating >server. > >Ryan > >-----Original Message----- >From:

Hello all, I’m running Shorewall 2.2.1 on linux kernel 2.6.10 with iptables 1.2.11. I recently ran a nessus scan of my firewall from a machine outside of the firewall and the nessus report told me that there are some ports open that I did not specify to be open. The ports are 32772/udp, 123/udp, 111/tcp, 32772/udp, and 53/udp. Why are these ports open when I did NOT specify them to be open

Hi, I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. After some penetration testing, found some high severity OpenSSH issues which would require its upgrade. But till CentOS 5.9 the latest rpm available is openssh-4.3p2-82.el5 (which I'm currently using). Is it fine to upgrade to CentOS 6 rpms while I'm on CentOS 5? Thanks, Anumeha

I have dovecot running as a pop3s server on port 995 it works great with sendmail and I run nessus to check security issues nessus reports this The SSLv2 server offers 3 strong ciphers, but also 0 medium strength and 2 weak "export class" ciphers. The weak/medium ciphers may be chosen by an export-grade or badly configured client software. They only offer a limited protection against

Recently, i scanned my samba4.1 server by Nessus (a vulnerability scanner tool - http://www.tenable.com/products/nessus) Nessus says that Samba4 is vulnerable to "LDAP NULL BASE Search Access" as "The remote LDAP server may disclose sensitive information." Further it says that - The remote LDAP server supports search requests with a null, or empty, base object. This allows

I run samba 2.2.8a on my openbsd 3.4 box, installed from a package. All i need is the ability to mount disks form winxp boxes so i only run smbd, at 139/tcp. I tried scanning the box with nessus, and it came up with some results that got me curious. Since i dont know very much about the smb protocol I thought i should ask here. Have searched the archives but found only old posts, concering

Thanks for the replies. The tool that we used for testing the security vulnerability is "Nessus". I have glibc version 2.17-78.el7, I saw that CVE-2015-0235 (Ghost) is fixed in this version and I want to apply patch for the vulnerbailities CVE-2015-1472 & CVE-2015-1473. Can you please help me in finding the right version that has fixes for these? Thanks On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at

Hi, I install shorewall firewall on my server and after that I have big problem with SMTP, I can send messages with outlook to server but that messages don`t go out from server (Currently I have over 800 messages in the mail queue) My server is on WHM/cPanel and EXIM.... When I click on "Delivery Now" for some message in WHM I get error: Message 1BtoLi-00033G-RN is not frozen LOG: MAIN

Good Day All Sorry if this is a repeated email, but I need some information about how to disable SSL on a Samba4.2.2 AD domain controller as the nessus scanner is reporting the POODLE vulnerability and we are not allowed to have any of that in our environment. the nessus scan reports poodle vulnerability on all these ports: 443, 636, 3269 I had a look at previous posts but couldn't find a

I'm trying to get get nessus 2.2.5 to install on my centos 3.5 system. It errors out with this error: Press ENTER to continue x - Compiling the libraries x -- Configuring the sources for your system configure: error: Could not find OpenSSL and OpenSSL headers on your system **** An error occured :/ Do you want to save the compilation log to analyze what went wrong ? [y] Where should I save

I'm runninng samba 3.0.2a on a few machines, ADS security mode, domain member roles. I throw nessus at it, and it can fetch the SID and then list all of the users on the system. I view this as a security problem, is there a way to prevent this?

Hi, I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. I'm using openssl version openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5. The following vulnerability was reported by a Nessus security scan: "SSL/ TLS Renegotion Handshakes MiTm Plaintext Data Injection" As per following link, Redhat has introduced openssl-0.9.8m which fixes this specific issue:

My DNS gui(Cpanel/WHM) only allows the following options for entry type: A6 AAAA CNAME MX NS PTR TXT WRK Does anyone know if any of these options are acceptable substitutes for an SRV record, or do I need to put in a ticket to have a SRV record specifically created for me? ----- Andrew Thompson http://aktzero.com/

Thanks Kelvin I'm a bit confised tho, is this patch already avaiable? if yes, what is the parameter that disable ssl into the smb.conf? Maybe the guys from Enterprise samba have already included the patch into their releases so it's just a maatter of enabling the flag. I'm using sernet-samba-4.2.2 Thanks!