similar to: Ping Is Broken

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:03 AM, S. Schauenburg <s.schauenburg at gmail.com> wrote: > Ady2 suggested to me on IRC to add additional information to the ML. > > With BIOS P89 v1.32 (03/05/2015) I saw errors from core_udp_sendto: > Getting cached packet > My IP is 0.0.0.0 > core_udp_sendto: stalling on configure with no mapping > core_udp_sendto: stalling on configure with

El Lunes 01/02/2016, Daniel Ruiz Molina escribi?: > Hi, > > After installing CentOS 7 in a server with 2 NICs, system detects eth0 > and eth1 in reserve order. I would like to have eth1 as eth0 and eth0 as > eth1. I have forced HWADDR attribute in > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-etc{0,1}, but after rebooting, > order is the same... > > How can I solve it? >

Hello Gene, thanks a lot for your patch! It doesn't work yet, but I have some more information. Before the patch, the boot sequence ended with the following: NBP file download successfully. Getting cached packet My IP is 0.0.0.0 After the patch it ended with the following (note that the IP is the same as the Station IP address): NBP file download successfully. LibLocateHandle returned

Hey everyone, sorry for the delay in replying. First off, thanks for all the help, effort and support so far! == build == I built and used syslinux from https://github.com/ppatpat/syslinux (latest commit 43f5efa2db4a7880c7a2c6485d8fd8a64f0f33c3). On top of that I had to patch main.c. This had to be done to mitigate the following error when trying to 'make all': main.c:(.text+0x3b9):

>>> Looks like the patch mostly addresses the initial search to find the right handle for PXE.? I think I found the remaining source of the issue (the part that's generating the handle->Configure() messages). I'm trying to read through pieces of the EFI spec, gnu-efi API, and a few other sources.? I'm pretty certain you'll see that the previous patch/binaries

>>> > It does contain a Net but there are 2 issues with SNP: > 1) The interface is different than UDPv4/TCPv4 protocols; this imply lot of code. Not as much as you may think.? We already have lwIP implemented into lpxelinux.0.? It's more a matter of using more glue. > 2) SNP has its non-blocking transmit issues ; see "Flaws in the design" at >

Hello everyone, I'm trying to add a second DC to a Samba 4 AD: they both have multiple NICs and for this reason cannot find a way to make it work. They communicate through VPN and both have one of the bound interfaces set to the same IP address, 172.20.0.1, which doesn't allow me to route to the correct DC, and that is only part of the problem. Here is the configuration: *

I add some additional information I didn't give in my previous email, specifically how I tried to force DC1 and DC2 to contact each other only with their VPN IPs. I did so using dnsmasq as a DNS proxy. # DC1 configuration IP NIC1: 172.16.0.2 IP NIC2: 172.20.0.1 IP VPN: 172.19.1.173 --- /etc/resolv.conf: search domain.local domain domain.local nameserver 172.19.1.173 --- I configured dnsmasq

Hi, is it possible to have 2 different ISP in one server? i have 2 NIC cards im going to config ISP1 in NIC1 and ISP2 in NIC2? what should be the configuration for this setup? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070412/4c62019f/attachment-0004.html>

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 06:18:18PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I am playing with vhost multiqueue capability and have a question about > vhost multiqueue and RSS (receive side steering). My setup has Mellanox > ConnectX-3 NIC which supports multiqueue and RSS. Network related > parameters for qemu are: > > -netdev

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 06:18:18PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I am playing with vhost multiqueue capability and have a question about > vhost multiqueue and RSS (receive side steering). My setup has Mellanox > ConnectX-3 NIC which supports multiqueue and RSS. Network related > parameters for qemu are: > > -netdev

I have a problem browsing in my subnets let me explain me situation: I have a m0n0wall (FreeBSD based router software) with 3 nics. nic1:My WAN connection Nic2:My LAN connection (192.168.0.0/24 m0n0 is DHCP) Nic3:My Wifi connenciot (192.168.1.0/24 m0n0 is DHCP) just using ip-adresses acrossed the network is no problem. now i want to use windows browsing works on LAN but can't see the

I have both cable and dsl service. The router attached to the cable service is 192.168.0.1 and the router attached to the dsl service is 192.168.0.254. I determine which service my computers communicate through by setting the gateway assignment to either of those addresses and it just works. I can connect to my computers from the outside by port forwarding from my routers to the computer that I

Ok, the story is this, I''m running an Unreal Tournament 2004 server. It''s running on a system that has two external NICs that are connected to different ISPs. I would like players to be able to connect to the server from either link. My default gateway goes through NIC1. For traffic through NIC2 to work I simply added an extra routing table and rule. The extra routing table has

Hello, I thinking about using PCI passthrough to dedicated a domU as firewall. I understand PCI passthrough concept. When done, my domU will see network card and the dom0 won''t any more. So I''ll be able to filter all trafic from outside, since it will go through network domU. Then, how will I be able to connect other domU (and maybe dom0) to the network domU ? In a normal way,

Ok ive been trying to get this to work for about half a year now. Ive searched all over the internet for a solution for my problem. Ive found some solutions, but they only led me to yet more problems. What we want to do is the following: I live in a student complex with 7 other people. Every room has its own internet connection from the same ISP. Ip, gateway, subnet are asigned through dhcp on

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I was just measuring the bitrates of a couple of codecs via iax. I'm getting much higher numbers than expected, so maybe I'm doing something wrong? Measured with iptraf, values displayed are: codec: measured bitrate (bitrate according codec definition) gsm: 52 kbps (13 kpbs) alaw: 154 kbps (?) speex: 57 kpbs (24 kpbs) Seems a little

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:38:16PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 09:44:23AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 08:56:04PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 06:18:18PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > > > > I am playing with vhost multiqueue

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:38:16PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 09:44:23AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 08:56:04PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 06:18:18PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > > > > I am playing with vhost multiqueue

hello all, I have been trying to set-up bridged network with VLAN and not able to succeed as many tutorials address only single NIC. I am trying to setup 2 guests (backtrack instance) each guest has NIC1 and NIC2. following is snippet for guest1 I am not able to get 192.168.0.2 address back on guest eth0. VIRT-MANAGER GUI : guest1-lan details radio button left side panel NIC1