similar to: Desktop apps, OO and Scribus

We're trying to migrate RHEL3 and CentOS4 based samba servers over to CentOS5, but it's a bleeding disaster. We cannot get it to work reliably with any version of CentOS5, i386 or x86_64, the included 3.0.x version of samba or 3.4.x/3.5.x compiled from source. The symptoms are: read access is extremely slow, write access seems to work in principle (e.g. creating a zeros-sized file on

Reading the "waiting IOs" thread made me remember I have a similar problem that has been here for months, and I have no sulution yet. A single CentOS 5.2 x86_64 machine here is overloading our NetApp filer with excessive NFS getattr, lookup and access operations. The weird thing is that the number of these operations increases over time. I have an mrtg graph (which I didn't

I'm going to retire an old RHEL3 server and move the services to CentOS5. In particular, the web server is giving me a headache. On the old box, there's a hacked-up httpd/mod_jk/tomcat setup, and CentOS is perfect for the new box because the required components are included and the whole setup "just works" straight from installation. There seems to be surprisingly little

Users on Machine A with rights to log into and run jobs on Machine B using ssh want to be able to view and cancel print jobs on Machine B. This is easily accomplished via the commandline with lpq and lprm, but is there a GUI that I can give them? I have them running things like scribus using launchers like "ssh -X machineb scribus" and would like to provide similar functionality for

Hi, I receive this error when rsyncing. I suspect this is because of network problems. But the 'Invalid argument' and 'phase unknown' makes it very unobvious. ... packages/scribus/scribus-1.2.3-0.rf.src.rpm Read from remote host rsync.sw.be: Invalid argument rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 32768 bytes: phase "unknown" [sender]: Broken pipe (32) rsync:

We're experiencing problems with some legacy software when it comes to NFS access. Even though files are visible in a terminal and can be accessed with standard shell tools and vi, this software typically complains that the files are empty or not syntactically correct. The NFS filesystems in question are 8TB+ XFS filesystems mounted with

I created both English and French release notes pages for the upcoming CentOS LiveCD 5.3: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSLiveCD5.3 http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSLiveCD5.3/French The content is quite similar to the one from the CentOS LiveCD 5.2 except for these changes: - 5.2 -> 5.3 - file information (filename, size, md5sum, sha1sum) - some packages

C6 with CR x86_64 Third time when trying to install a packet I get: yum install samba [...] --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: glibc-2.12-1.7.el6_0.5.i686 (updates) Requires: glibc-common = 2.12-1.7.el6_0.5 Installed: glibc-common-2.12-1.25.el6_1.3.x86_64 (@cr) glibc-common = 2.12-1.25.el6_1.3 Available:

My name is Markus McLaughlin, I am coming on board the CentOS EDUcation SIG Project. I want to bring my resourcefulness and talents to this very ambitious project. Debian has already made available its own EDU distribution. It's time for CentOS to "step up," and offer its own service. Windows and MACs have dominated the education market far too long. It's time to bring

My C5, default Gnome desktop has recently changed behaviour, and I can't figure out how to restore the previous behaviour. Previously, clicking anywhere into a window raised it. Now, for the past few days, only clicking title bar or borders raises them. I logged off, completely wiped all destop settings, i.e. a whole bunch of .gnome* .gconf* .metacity etc. directories, even restarted X,

Some days back there was a mention about an open source image editor that people uses for application layout designing. I have forgotten about the name of that software. Can someone send me the link? Silvy Mathews

The CentOS Development team is pleased to announce the availability of the CentOS 5 i386 Live CD. This CD is based on our CentOS-5.0 i386 distribution. It can be used as a Workstation, with the following software: OpenOffice.org 2.0.4 Firefox 1.5.0.10 Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 Gaim-2.0.0 Scribus-1.3.3 xchat-2.6.6 k3b-0.12.17 Gimp-2.2.13 It can also be used as a rescue CD with the following tools:

The CentOS Development team is pleased to announce the availability of the CentOS 5 i386 Live CD. This CD is based on our CentOS-5.0 i386 distribution. It can be used as a Workstation, with the following software: OpenOffice.org 2.0.4 Firefox 1.5.0.10 Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 Gaim-2.0.0 Scribus-1.3.3 xchat-2.6.6 k3b-0.12.17 Gimp-2.2.13 It can also be used as a rescue CD with the following tools:

Im just about to convert an access based system to ROR. But i have no idea how i would print out documents/letters from within ROR. Does anyone have any ideas how to mail merge my database into documents and then print them?? Is there an easy solution? Any help is appreciated as i''m kindof stuck Thanks, Chris -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

> Nice to know I'm not the only one that tries to use system facilities > the way they were intended to work and has problems. Maybe if you touch > the bug report so they know I'm not the only one the folks will look and > elevate to RH bug just like they used to do? I was surprised that > "crash" didn't get any attention. While only vaguely related to this

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91411 Bug ID: 91411 Summary: TV hdmi output doesn't fit with desktop, minimize button(on windows) are missing, etc[NV50] Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

Hi, Being relatively new to OO programming and not so old on R, I noticed the possibility to do OO programming in R. But it seems there is two "paradigms" S3 that seems the old one but is the one used in the R.oo package and S4 which seems more recent As a starting point, which one is best to use? Is R.oo useful? what are the main difference between the two? Any feedback

In order to get an OpenOffice configuration that is closer in compatibility with MS Office 2007, I removed the standard OO in 5.4 via yum and installed the latest (3.2.0) from OpenOffice.org. Ran that config for many months without a problem. However, when I allowed the upgrade to 5.5, OO broke. I finally had to remove all traces of OO 3.2.0, and start over. That worked...until yum tells me that

Can someone show me how to modify one (R.oo) class's object inside another (R.oo) class's method? Is that possible with the R.oo package? A quick example or reference to an example would be outstanding... Thanks, Ben [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R.oo package users, while testing some functionality of the R.oo, I found that during the first construction of a object from a class, the constructor is twice called, but only one object is finalized. In all subsequent creation processes, the constructor is (expectedly) called once. Here some example code: library(R.oo) setConstructorS3("Test_class",function(val) {