similar to: rsync exclusions

Hi All, Rsyncing to a USB drive. I am in single user mode. I am doing: rsync -avx --stats --progress --ignore-existing --exclude 'home/backup/ data' / /mnt/sdb2/ But I dont see if ignoring existing. A previous rsync stalled and now it seems to be copying them again rather than ignoring them. Does anyone have thoughts? -ML

Hello everybody, I been trying to debug a problem for a month now and can use some insights and advice. This is the setup, I got two linux ha storage node providing iscsi disk, the disks is mounted on two linux kvm host and one backup server. The iscsi disk has lvm on it, the logical volume groups are visible on all servers. On the backup server I have the following running: # guestmount

I am trying to backup my /home directory. A friend helped me with this script: #!/bin/sh #backup friday #"Spinning up backup drive and mounting it .." cd / mount /mnt/hd2 #"Starting backup procedures" rsync -avx --exclude="/home/gary/.thumbnails/" --exclude="/home/gary/tmp/" --delete --ignore-errors /home/gary /mnt/hd2/2010 umount /mnt/hd2 #END It backs

Hey, I am trying to upgrade my kickstart usb key to 6.0 and I ran into a few issues. I boot with: ? append initrd=initrd.img ks=hd:sdb2:/ks.cfg repo=hd:sdb2:/centos and in the ks.cfg I have: ? harddrive --partition=sdb2 --dir=/centos and on sdb2 I have: ? sdb2:/centos/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-bin-DVD1.iso ? sdb2:/centos/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-bin-DVD2.iso It fails from the beginning unless I add /images

Hello how i can use rsync whith mkdir -p for nackup dirs ? when i use rsync / /backup/month/day i need automatic creation month and day dirs. mkdir -p can do that, but rsync can't

hi all! back in Aug several of you assisted me in solving a problem where one of my drives had dropped out of (or been kicked out of) the raid1 array. something vaguely similar appears to have happened just a few mins ago, upon rebooting after a small update. I received four emails like this, one for /dev/md0, one for /dev/md1, one for /dev/md125 and one for /dev/md126: Subject: DegradedArray

Doing this would reliably fail with -EBUSY for me: # mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt/scratch; umount /mnt/scratch; mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb2 ... unable to open /dev/sdb2: Device or resource busy because mkfs.btrfs tries to open the device O_EXCL, and somebody still has it. Using systemtap to track bdev gets & puts shows a kworker thread doing a blkdev put after mkfs attempts a get; this is left over

Hello, I'm trying to backup partition "/users1" on host "john" onto partition "backup1" on host "mary". Here is my rsyncd.conf: [backup1] path = /backup1 use chroot uid root gid root auth users = backup secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secrets strict modes = true hosts allow = 193.136.196.9 hosts deny = * It works with ssh as

I'm currently using rsync to backup home directories using this: rsync -avx --delete --backup --backup-dir=/u1/home.bak /u0/home/ /u1/home >> ${log} I'm trying to move to snapshot backups using this: rsync -avx --delete --backup --backup-dir=/u1/home.bak --link-dest=../home.current /u0/home/ /u1/home_${datetime} >> ${log} This works except I no longer get deleted source

I installed Centos 6.x 64 bit with the minimal ISO and used two disks in RAID 1 array. Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/md2 97G 918M 91G 1% / tmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /dev/shm /dev/md1 485M 54M 407M 12% /boot /dev/md3 3.4T 198M 3.2T 1% /vz Personalities : [raid1] md1 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1] 511936 blocks super 1.0

Sjors Gielen wrote: > Then I noticed that the partition /dev/sdb2 was mounted noexec, so I > umounted ~/.wine and /media/sdb2, remounted /dev/sdb2 with exec, and > remounted ~/.wine - and it all worked again. > > This is with Wine 1.1.24. Has this always been behavior, or is it a > regression somewhere? Wine will not work / run programs from mount mounted with noexec. It's

I know similar topics have been covered before, but I''d like to get a more up-to-date Ruby developer''s opinions. (Please note that I''ve read similar threads in this group and read a lot of hosting comparison sites, even contacted both companies and am still having a hard time making decisions. ) After reading about limitations with shared hosting plans, I decided that

Hi, I am trying to install Xen/Xenolinux v1.1 on my workstation which has 2 SCSI disks. The first disk has WinXP installed, and the second disk has Redhat 8.0. I copied the images into /boot and modified grub.conf accordingly: title Xen / XenoLinux 2.4.22 root (hd1,0) kernel /xen.gz dom0_mem=131072 ser_baud=115200 noht noreboot module /xenolinux.gz root=/dev/sdb2 ro

Hi Bruno, > Some comments: > > + // Try to synthesize horizontal adds from adds of shuffles. > + if (((Subtarget->hasSSE3()&& (VT == MVT::v4f32 || VT == MVT::v2f64)) || > + (Subtarget->hasAVX()&& (VT == MVT::v8f32 || VT == MVT::v4f64)))&& > + isHorizontalBinOp(LHS, RHS, true)) > > 1) You probably want to do something like: >

The output of the avx-hadd program is 3 11 7 15 Preston -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Duncan Sands Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:14 PM To: Bruno Cardoso Lopes Cc: LLVMdev Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Patch to synthesize x86 hadd instructions; need help with the tablegen bits Hi Bruno, > Some comments:

I wonder why AVX is not used automatically if available at the host machine. In contrast to that, SSE41 instructions (like pmulld) are automatically used if the host machine supports SSE41. E.g. $ cat avx.ll define void @_fun1(<8 x float>*, <8 x float>*) { _L1: %x = load <8 x float>* %0 %y = load <8 x float>* %1 %z = fadd <8 x float> %x, %y store

On Thu, 24 May 2012, Pan, Wei wrote: > Very likely AVX is not enabled in your llc. This feature was enabled > just recently (late of April). I forgot to mention that I am using recent LLVM-3.1 and in principle my llc knows about avx as I have shown in the second example. But avx does not seem to be used by default. On Thu, 24 May 2012, Henning Thielemann wrote: > $ llc -o - -mattr

Hi all, I would like to find out whether anyone will find it useful to add an x86- specific calling convention for reducing emission of vzeroupper instructions. Current implementation: vzeroupper is inserted to any functions that use AVX instructions. The insertion points are: 1) before a call instruction; 2) before a return instruction; Background: vzeroupper is an AVX instruction; it is

I've been working on adding AVX to LLVM and have run across a number of questions. Here's the first one. In some ways AVX is "just another" SSE level. Having AVX implies you have SSE1-SSE4.2. However AVX is very different from SSE and there are a number of sub-features which may or may not be available on various implementations. So right now I've done this: def

Henning, I believe the code that is supposed to do this is in: lib/Target/X86/X86Subtarget.cpp in X86Subtarget::AutoDetectSubtargetFeatures() Is there a bug in that function? -Hal On Thu, 24 May 2012 23:56:48 +0200 (CEST) Henning Thielemann <llvm at henning-thielemann.de> wrote: > > On Thu, 24 May 2012, Pan, Wei wrote: > > > Very likely AVX is not enabled in your llc.