similar to: Xnest unable to connect with firewall enabled (possible bug with 5.3)

Hi all, I have worked on both CentOS 5.2 and CentOS 5.3. In CentOS 5.2, I could connect to a remote X-server using Xnest binary provided by the package xorg-x11-server-Xnest-1.1.1-48.41.el5 with firewall settings enabled. I enabled the firewall settings from system-config-securitylevel. Now in CentOS 5.3 with firewall settings enabled, I am unable to connect to the remote X-server using Xnest

I still don't like gnome.... Got a user who wants the "whole gnome experience" (i.e., he can't deal w/ the command line), so I'm testing this: I'm running 6.5, KDE. On the server, I've installed both Xnest, "Gnome Desktop Environment", and "X Window System". Xnest works fine, I can start xclock, or an xterm, but if I try DISPLAY=:1, I see the

see a copy of your rsyncd.conf? Tim Conway tim.conway@philips.com 303.682.4917 Philips Semiconductor - Longmont TC 1880 Industrial Circle, Suite D Longmont, CO 80501 Available via SameTime Connect within Philips, n9hmg on AIM perl -e 'print pack(nnnnnnnnnnnn, 19061,29556,8289,28271,29800,25970,8304,25970,27680,26721,25451,25970), ".\n" ' "There are some who call me....

Ok, I just setup the log file and this is what I see there: rsync on cdrive/Temp/pix.log from admx (141.214.137.139) transfer interrupted (code 3) at flist.c(812) I had to change [cdrive] from path = "c:\" to path = c: to get rid of '@ERROR: chdir failed' error. I am getting close but still need some help. Thanks in advance. Nishi > -----Original Message----- From:

> On Sep 19, 2017, at 10:09 AM, Siddharth Shankar Swain <h2015096 at pilani.bits-pilani.ac.in> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > Thanks for the suggestion i was trying to use the patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D30691 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D30691> and ASTimporter concept for cross file analysis. Can u explain in details the approach u suggested ? There is a tutorial on

On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 8:50 AM, nate <centos at linuxpowered.net> wrote: > > re-create the original partition table, which is just a map, as long > as you haven't formatted or overwritten data everything should still > be there > > Also suggest if your not already doing it set your LVm partitons to > type 8e so it's obvious they are LVM > > [root at

LLVM does not allow the use of exceptions in our code. We do not allow throwing or catching them. That does not mean you cannot compile the code with exceptions enabled, it just means we don't use them. Clang is a full C++ compiler. Even though LLVM & Clang do not use exceptions in their implementation, Clang does support compiling C++ code that uses exceptions. Does this answer your

Hopefully someone else on the dev list who has experience with LNT and the LLVM test-suite will chime in. I've never run it myself. Adding Mehdi since he ran it with LTO/ThinLTO. I found some documentation for the test-suite: https://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#test-suite-overview http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/tests.html#llvm-cmake-test-suite But I

I'm not completely sure what you are asking. Are you looking for performance benchmarks to use for LTO and ThinLTO testing? Or are you asking how to build/run with LTO and ThinLTO? Are you asking how to run LLVM's performance test-suite with LTO and ThinLTO? Teresa On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 5:21 AM Siddharth Shankar Swain < h2015096 at pilani.bits-pilani.ac.in> wrote: > Hi, >

yeah so when LTO runs, in the linker, it uses the target to produce object code. In the sense of code generation for target arch. Thanks, Siddharth On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:03 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote: > Can you be more specific? LTO/ThinLTO are target independent. You just > need to be using a linker that supports *LTO (gold, lld, ld64, eg). > Teresa

I'd be interested in attending and helping organise the Hyderabad meetup. Cheers Siddharth On Wed 30 May, 2018, 14:32 Siddharth Shankar Swain via llvm-dev, < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > We are a group of LLVM compiler developers in Hyderabad area. Considering > few previous mail about meetups in India, we are planning to organize LLVM > meetups

Hi Chris, Thanks for answering, Can u clarify on this comment mentioned in https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3/issues/861 . cplusplus no exception support · Issue #861 · Z3Prover/z3 · GitHub - LLVM's *source code* does not use exceptions for performance reasons and so is compiled by default with -fno-exceptions. When using LLVM's libraries via it's C++ interface it is important

Siddharth, I'm not sure what coding standards you refer to when you say "some C++ coding standard". This question is answered in the LLVM Coding Standards document here: https://www.llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#do-not-use-rtti-or-exceptions <https://www.llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#do-not-use-rtti-or-exceptions> As such LLVM's coding standards prohibit the

Yes running LLVM performance test suite with LTO and Thin LTO enabled. Thanks, Siddharth On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote: > I'm not completely sure what you are asking. Are you looking for > performance benchmarks to use for LTO and ThinLTO testing? Or are you > asking how to build/run with LTO and ThinLTO? Are you asking how to

I see. Is there a pre-existing way to do this in LLVM? Cheers, ~Siddharth. On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 at 02:12 Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > ConstantExprs are immutable, they can't be changed once they are created. > And a ConstantExpr can reference other ConstantExprs. So replacing all uses > of a Value in a ConstantExpr would require creating a new immutable

+ llvm-dev It sounds like you are more interested in how to generate CFI instructions for your architecture. It is often instructive to look at how other architectures handle this, as a model for new architectures. I am not familiar with that area myself. --paulr From: Siddharth Shankar Swain [mailto:h2015096 at pilani.bits-pilani.ac.in] Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 11:06 AM To: Robinson,

(Apologies for the re-send Siddharth, I failed to cc the list) There is no existing tool that I'm aware of which performs this analysis on the AST. It is possible to do on an AST. You would just need to write an AST Visitor that finds declarations, definitions, and uses of functions. Is there a reason you need to do this at the AST level? With C code this analysis can be trivially performed

Thanks Daniel for the info. Siddharth On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Dániel Krupp <daniel.krupp at ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi Siddharth, > > > > since the CTU functionality is not yet part of the mainline clang (review > ongoing), you will need to clone our patched version of clang5 > > https://github.com/Ericsson/clang > > (ctu-clang5 branch) > > >

Hi Siddharth, alternativly you can try this <https://github.com/rizsotto/scan-build>, it's written in Python. Regards, Laszlo On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 5:14 AM Artem Dergachev via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I never tried it myself but i can try to help you with specific problems > that you're having if you disclose them. > >

Hi, Thanks for the info, If i only want to run performance test on benchmarks for LTO and Thin LTO enabled target, Can u suggest ways to do it ? I want to do it at my end. Thanks, Siddharth On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote: > I've only measured performance on x86. There are some old results for SPEC > cpu2006 in the blog post here: