similar to: Opinions on bonding modes?

With the current talk on bonding, I have a few questions of my own. I'm setting up a KVM host with CentOS 6.3 x86_64 on which I'd like to attach the VMs to a bonded interface. My target setup is one where two GigE NICs are bonded and then the KVM bridge interface is attached to the bonded interface. Initially I tried to use the balance-alb mode (mode6), but had little luck (receiving

Hi, may be there are some best practice suggestions for the "best mode" for channel bonding interface? Or in other words, when should/would I use which mode? E.g. I do have some fileservers connected to the users lan and to some ISCSI Storages. Or some Webservers only connected to the LAN. The switches are all new cisco models. I've read sone docs (1), (2) and (3) so the theory

Hi, I am currently struggling with the right way to configure a bonding device via kickstart (via PXE). I am installing servers which have "eno" network interfaces. Instead of the expected bonding device with two active slaves (bonding mode is balance-alb), I get a bonding device with only one active slave and an independent, non-bonded network device. Also the bonding device

I have a bonded interface running in mode 1 which is active/passive and no issue with this. I need to change it to mode 0 for active/active setup. Does mode 0 is dependent on the switches configuration? My setup is: 2 links from bonded interface is connected to different switches. When I change to mode0 from mode1 , bond0 is not coming up. These are the steps I performed 1) changed to options

Since I upgraded from 4.4 to 4.5 my system which has 2 sets of ALB bonded interfaces hangs on shutdown while doing an ifdown on these interfaces. Has anyone else seen this issue with 4.5 and bonding? Ross S. W. Walker Information Systems Manager Medallion Financial, Corp. 437 Madison Avenue 38th Floor New York, NY 10022 Tel: (212) 328-2165 Fax: (212) 328-2125 WWW: http://www.medallion.com

Hi, we are trying to switch our bonding modes from 1 (active-backup) to 6 (balance-alb). However it seems, that these bond devices are not always getting the MAC address from the same slave. Sometimes the device gets the MAC address of the first and sometimes of the second slave. Since only the MAC address of the first slave device is (can be) registered in DHCP, this breaks connectivity

On 18/04/2017 15:54, Frank Thommen wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently struggling with the right way to configure a bonding > device via kickstart (via PXE). > > I am installing servers which have "eno" network interfaces. Instead of > the expected bonding device with two active slaves (bonding mode is > balance-alb), I get a bonding device with only one active slave

I have installed CentOS 4.5 and 5 on 2 separate machines, and both have default installs of vim-enhanced on each of them. I noticed that I can get syntax highlighting as a regular user, sudo and as root in C4.5. In C5 I only get highlighting as a regular user. I diff'ed my /etc/vimrc files between each install there is no changes and neither root ~ has a .vimrc file. I had put "# vim:

OK, at least its not an *issue* with Gluster. I didn't expect any but you never know. I have been amused at the 'lack' of discussion on Teaming performance found on Google searches. There are lots of 'here it is and here is how to set it up' articles/posts, but no 'ooh-wee-wow it is awesome' comments. It seems that for most people Bonding has worked it kinks out

I'm looking at tuning up a new site and the bonding issue came up A google search reveals that the gluster docs (and Lindsay) recommend balance-alb bonding. However, "team"ing came up which I wasn't familiar with. Its already in RH6/7 and Ubuntu and their Github page implies its stable. The libteam.org people seem to feel their solution is more lightweight and it seems easy

Hi, I have a dataset called 'fish'. fish$Species returns extract 1. When I use fish$Species != c("CRA","PHC"), i.e. I want all species except "CRA" and "PHC", I get extract 2 which is blatantly wrong. Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong? Regards, James EXTRACT 1 > fish$Species [1] ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB

I'm trying to test out an Equallogic PS5500 with a server running CentOS 4.7 I can create a volume and mount it fine using the standard iscsi-initiator-utils tools. The Equallogic box has 3 Gigabit interfaces and I would like to try to set up things so I can read/write from/to the volume using multiple NICs on the server i.e. get 200+ Mbyte/s access to the volume - I've had some

I haven't done any testing of performance differences, but on my oVirt/rhev i use standard bonding as that's that it supports. On the stand along gluster nodes I use teaming for bonding. Teaming may be slightly easier to manage, but not by much if you are already used to bond setups. I haven't noticed any bugs or issues using teaming. *David Gossage* *Carousel Checks Inc. | System

Hi, ------- ------- | B |eth0---------eth0| C | | |eth1---------eth1| | ------- ------- In an attempt to have the install setup to increase speed and/or reliability of a link between two linux machines (for example in case of a wireless connection), I read that there were more than one solution, for example the old eql driver, bonding

Hello, I have a csv-file which looks like: #### pwt6_r.csv #### code;year;rgdpch AGO;1998;1234 ALB;1998;3576 ARG;1998;#NA SVN;1996;13439 SWE;1996;21492 AGO;1960;#NA ALB;1960;2345 ARG;1960;4634 #### pwt6_r.csv #### To import this file i call: pwt6<-read.csv("d:/pwt6_r.csv",header=T,na.strings="#NA",sep=";") Now I want to generate a new data.frame which include

Hi all, I''m struggling with the following: I have a defined type wrapped in a class: class myclass { define mytype(bla) { file { "blabla": .... } exec { "blablabla": ... } } } And I access the defined type in my other class by doing this: class otherclass { include myclass myclass::mytype { "alb": ... } # and here I want to

Hi, When I run the following Cox proportional hazards model on the Mayo clinic's PBC data set (given in the "survival" package), the regression coefficients do not agree with the results presented in Table 4.6.3 (p. 195) of Fleming & Harrington's book. library(survival) data(pbc) ans.cox <- coxph(Surv(time, status) ~ log(bili) + log(alb) + age + log(protime) +

On 07/08/12 17:00, centos-request at centos.org wrote: > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:34:43 +0200 > From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Configure LAGG Interface? > To: centos at centos.org > Message-ID: <50201C53.2070300 at uni-x.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Am 06.08.2012 19:44, schrieb

Hello, I have a data.frame with the following format: > head(clin2) Study Subject Type Obs Cycle Day Date Time 1 A001101 10108 ALB 44.00000 98 1 2004-03-11 14:26 2 A001101 10108 ALP 95.00000 98 1 2004-03-11 14:26 3 A001101 10108 ALT 61.00000 98 1 2004-03-11 14:26 5 A001101 10108 AST 33.00000 98 1 2004-03-11 14:26 I want to transform this

took a couple months off due to road blocks, hoping a fresh look would allow me to use my server as desired. I have three ports, eth0-2 over two nics. I want to bond them, and then use a bridge to connect to virtual machines on the virtual host computer. Never having done this, I am confused on some parts. Here is where I am at now and any pointers helpful. Single server, centos 6.x My issue