similar to: ext4 in centos 5.3

Hello, I have two hosts with a tunnel closed by vtun, when I reboot a host, the other show the error bellow. unregister_netdevice: waiting for tun0 to become free. Usage count = 6 OS version: CentOS 5.4 Vtund version: vtun-3.0.2-1 some idea about? Thanks -- Daniel Bruno http://danielbruno.eti.br danielbruno at projetofedora.org

Hi, Recently I updated my CentOS 4.8 and while the updates has installed, yum show me this error some times: /sbin/ldconfig: file /usr/lib/libtcl8.4.so;48c8dd6a is truncated /sbin/ldconfig: File /usr/lib/libtcl8.4.so;48c78993 is empty, not checked. /sbin/ldconfig: File /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3;48ccd312 is empty, not checked. thanks, -- Daniel Bruno http://danielbruno.eti.br

I can't access the share through a station with Windows XP, in the messages log show this error: Jul 21 15:34:55 files smbd[5097]: [2009/07/21 15:34:55, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_data(562) Jul 21 15:34:55 files smbd[5097]: write_data: write failure in writing to client 192.168.1.74. Error Broken pipe Jul 21 15:34:55 files smbd[5097]: [2009/07/21 15:34:55, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(761) Jul

I configured a tunnel where the server is a CentOS 5 x86_64 with compress. In the client don't have problem but in the message log of the server show this erro: vtund[15145]: segfault at 0000000000000040 rip 0000000000409774 rsp 00007fff88d548d0 error 4 I did the same configuration on another server, but i686 and had no problems. Packs: vtun-3.0.2-1.el5.rf x86_64 lzo2-2.02-3.el5.rf x86_64

Enhance fstype so it properly takes into account whether or not the ext4 and/or ext4dev filesystems are present, and properly handles the test_fs flag. The old code also has some really buggy checks --- for example, where it compared the set of supported ro_compat features against the incompat feature bitmask: (sb->s_feature_incompat & __cpu_to_le32(EXT3_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_SUPP) I

Hi, I was wondering what is the current status fro ext4 support in Centos. I've noticed that is marked as dev when I try to use it from the installer. Does anybody have a scary story to prevent using it? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090902/7ba417df/attachment-0001.html>

Is 5.3 and ext4 going to be safe? I have seen a couple reports of data loss using ext4? Has this already been fixed? What does the list recommend? ext3/ ext4? Thought maybe today we would start seeing 5.3 showing up... Looking forward to it. Jerry

Listee's... I have a 5.5 box and I have formatted a partition as ext4 however I can't mount it, the mount command is telling me its an unknown file system type. fsck tells me the partition is a clean ext4 partition but I can't mount it. Some reasearch has lead me to believe the problem is that ext4 isn't enabled in the kernel by default in 5.5 (this was originally a 5.2 box that

Hi, I have a server with Centos 5 + DRBD installed and is working fine, but when i run yum for udpate system show this error: Transaction Check Error: file /etc/drbd.conf conflicts between attempted installs of drbd-8.0.12-1.el5.centos and drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos file /etc/rc.d/init.d/drbd conflicts between attempted installs of drbd-8.0.12-1.el5.centos and drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos file

Hello, Someone had some problem recently with DRBD updates? Thanks, -- Daniel Bruno http://danielbruno.eti.br

Hello, Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with CentOS 5.x? Thanks, -- Daniel Bruno http://danielbruno.eti.br

Commit-ID: 52251e210c7a21068063fe16a3874903d3f1aa14 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=52251e210c7a21068063fe16a3874903d3f1aa14 Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> AuthorDate: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 20:39:46 +0100 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 00:13:20 +0100 [klibc] fstype: Drop obsolete

Hi All, For those testing EXT4 I seem to have found an issue with anaconda where by if you specify EXT4 fstype in your kickstart file it will not install and complains that if needs another 250MB of disk space. I've tried with my kickstart set for 10G for root at ext3 and it works fine. 10,15 and 20GB with EXT4 all fail. BTW: can't put /boot on it either. Just a heads up for all.

hello hpa, nothing too exciting, again syncing latest Debian upload and subsequent patch emails. plus wanting to get the ext4dev in line for the Lenny release. :) please review. thanks -- maks please pull git pull git://git.debian.org/~maks/klibc.git maks for the changes: Arthur Loiret (1): Makefile (ARCH): Support sh4 as sh. David H?rdeman (1): [klibc] mount: allow multiple fs

I made a filesystem (mke2fs -j) on a logical volume under kernel 2.6.20 on a 64-bit based system, and when I try to mount it, ext3 complains with EXT3-fs: dm-1: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (80). I first thought I just forgot to make the filesystem, so I remade it and the error is still present. I ran fsck on this freshly made filesystem, and it completed with

hello hpa, rebased my branch, please pull latest git pull git://brane.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/klibc.git maks for the following shortlog maximilian attems (6): fstype: add squashfs v3 support reiser4_fs.h: add attribute packed to reiser4_master_sb fstype: add ext4 support .gitignore: add subdir specific entries usr/klibc/Kbuild: beautify klibc build fstype:

ocfs2 currently uses the Journaled Block Device (JBD) for its journaling. This is a very stable and tested codebase. However, JBD is limited by architecture to 32bit block numbers. This means an ocfs2 filesystem is limited to 2^32 blocks. With a 4K blocksize, that's 16TB. People want larger volumes. Fortunately, there is now JBD2. JBD2 adds 64bit block number support and some other

Hi Dears, I am having trouble mounting a partition with UFS file system (FreeBSD), I am trying to build with the following commands: mount-r-t-o ufs ufstype = ufs2 / dev/hdb1 / part mount-r-t-o ufs ufstype = 44bsd / dev/hdb1 / part But appears the following error message: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on / dev/hdb1, missing codepage or other error In some

In my /var/log/maillog show this message: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(apache): can not chdir(/var/spool/clientmqueue/): Permission denied Permissions on dir: drwxrwx--- 2 smmsp smmsp 36864 Jun 30 15:23 clientmqueue If i change the permissions to 777 works normaly but is not safe and in other server works fine with the permissions 770. Anybody have any idea? Thanks, -- Daniel Bruno

What is the difference in treatment between an ajax link_to_remote and a form_remote_tag This works great and adds a list item to an ordered list with id=form_results link_to_remote ("Help me please!", :update => ''form_results'', :url => { :action => :search_ajax_test }, :position =>