similar to: OT: Strange message in root e-mail possiablly hacked!!! Not sure??

Afternoon All, Just ran yum update and it burped on the following: Package xulrunner.i386 0:1.9.2.20-3.el5_7 set to be updated --> Processing Conflict: firefox conflicts xulrunner >= 1.9.2.19 firefox-3.6.18-1.el5.centos.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> firefox conflicts with xulrunner Uname -a gives: Linux 2.6.18-274.el5 #1 SMP Fri Jul 22 04:49:12 EDT 2011 i686 i686

Hi All, Quick question, I just finished googling and found the thread that is dealing with the rpmdup_remover.sh script, and thanks to everyone that was involved in this. I followed the following threads: http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/centos at centos.org/11086209.html http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=17166&forum=37 Which lead me to the

Hi Everyone, I've got kids who are growing older and I want to build a Linux box to filter Internet access. I've got six computers on the Internet, plus the laptops -- most run Windows. I'm not sure if it's called a router or gateway or...? I don't mind doing the leg work, I just don't know where to start. I'm pretty sure I'm *not* looking for a web server (though

Does anyone on this list use Windstream as a SIP trunk provider? If so, would you mind sharing your peer settings? I'm using asterisk 13.7.2 and can't seem to get the inbound working correctly (using registration). Outbound is fine, but they are seeing an authentication error on their end. Here are my inbound peer settings: username=<accountnumber> secret=<secret>

I know a lot of you are using IPCop where you work. They have three (3) updates posted, during the past two (2) days. The last one, I'm getting an error, when I try to Download it, and I will report that to the IPCop list or bugzilla after I send this message. "No such file or directory http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/ipcop/ipcop-1.4.21-update.i386.tgz.gpg?download" The problem I

I have purchased a used Compaq DL360 which I was going to use as a proxy server. Presently, we are using a cheap box with ipcop which is working fine but it didn't have much RAM (64MB), etc. This new box we will want to run squid and perhaps dansguardian for filtering (this is a non-profit company) and I'm wondering if I should just put ipcop on it or would it be smarter/better to install

Hello, I've been working on this for over a week. I don't think its working the way it should. Here's what I'm trying to do: I have a Windstream dsl router with wireless > 192.168.1.100 | | Centos 6.8 server eth0 > 192.168.1.110 > gateway 192.168.1.111 eth1 > 192.168.1.111 > gateway 192.168.1.100 | | Switch > other

Hi, I am trying to use two products that use SysLinux and finally realised the SysLinux is the cause of my woes. I'm trying to use Freesco and IPCop. IPCop version 1.3 used a different boot loader to 1.4 which uses SysLinux. I have been through numerous trials and tribulations in trying to get Freesco to work but eventually gave up and went with IPCop. I kept getting the "Boot

I'm running Asterisk 1.2.13 on a Solaris 10 X86 box behind an IPCop firewall on a 5Mbps down/512 up cable connection. I'm having sound quality problems when users call in for voicemail and with music on hold. The sound is choppy and muffled while souding pretty good for calls inside the network. I'd appreciate some pointers as to where to start looking to improve things. I've

Is there a list of which kernel versions (are supposed to) work with (each version of) klibc? I do recall reading something that said klibc should run under any version of the kernel, regardless of which version it is compiled against. Following the new instructions on this list earlier (to use the KLIBCKERNELSRC= parameter to point to the installed kernel headers) as well as also making the

Hello everybody, for just one week I try to install three servers on an OpenSuSE 10.3 dom0 equipped with 4 NICs. One server is an OX using the onboard NIC via xenbr0. This server runs!! For my IPCop server I intended to use the three remaining NICs (Intel Pro100/S, 3Com 3C590, Realtek RTL-8139). These three NICs should be used natively by my IPCop. So I tried to use the pciback driver. I wrote a

>Message: 23 >Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:11:59 -0400 >From: Dan Halbert <halbert at everyzing.com> >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Newbie ADSL configuration, ppp0 can't activate & > config not found >To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> >Message-ID: <469830EF.3080601 at everyzing.com> mailing-lists at computer2.com wrote: <snip>

A few weeks back I had tried to install CentOS on my old AMD 5x6x (equiv to P75 performance) with plans to use it as my firewall and router. Because there were some problems relating to RPM compile architecture (apparently), I posted and Bryan suggested IPCop, even at peril to his life on these lists ;-) according to him. ;-) ;-) Just wanted to tell him thanks, it's worked out well. Had

Hi, I have tried unsuccesfully to limit my ftp server send speed in linux. I have an ipcop linux firewall/router with 2 nics. 1 nic (eth1) is connected to a 3mbit/384Kbit cable connection and the other (eth0) a switch. Behind it i have a suse linux box and a windows box. On the suse box i run proftpd. I need to shape my passive ftp send speed to 34KBytes because if it is maxed out at 45K

Well it appears i have no clue what im doing. I thought i had the below script working to shape outbound ftp traffic....however, it is shaping inbound traffic too. I have NO clue why. Please comment if anyone has any ideas why this doesnt work. I want to shape only outbound ftp traffic and not inbound or lan traffic. #!/bin/bash #shaping passive and active outbound ftp traffic on an

On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 02:11:38PM +0100, Ralf Petry wrote: > more or less just a general question: i am running a suse linux 8.1 as > a server and ipcop 1.2 (and at another place ipcop 1.4) as > firewall/router. > i would like to achieve the following: allow a certain company (with > windows server and clients) to connect > to my network via vpn. where would i set up tinc? on

At 07:43 AM 6/29/2015, you wrote: >James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Mon, June 29, 2015 02:14, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > OS 6? > >> > >> Please note: I'm not criticizing, just curious about the argument > >> behind using a regular OS to do firewall-stuff. > > > > Maintenance. > > > > A consistent set of expectations does wonders for

I am currently running the following script on an internal machine to shape outbound ftp and email traffic. I am trying to move the script to my nat router (ipcop with 2 nic cards) so that it shapes the whole network and not only the outbound of 1 box. I have cable modem -> ipcop (eth1) >(eth0 - 192.168.1.1) > 192.168.1.100 and 192.168.1.101. The scripts works great running on

We are looking for a good firewall replacement which will basically do pot blocking and QOS. Our current solution just plain stinks.. We basically need to handle the traffic of a few web servers, mail server and asterisk box. The most traffic this device will need to handle is what can be shoved through a T1. I don't mind buying an appliance to get something solid but IP Cop just looks

Hello all, I've setup samba Version 2.2.0a on Slackware 8.0 # uname -a Linux slackware 2.4.5 #6 Fri Jun 22 01:38:20 PDT 2001 i686 unknown I start samba as root from a console as: /usr/sbin/smbd -D -d10 -l /var/adm/smblogs/log -s /etc/samba/smb.conf /usr/sbin/nmbd -D -d1 -s /etc/samba/smb.conf In smb.conf I have: [files] comment = mystuff valid users = nigels path = /usr1 read