similar to: Execution from ip-up.local

Hi, I am planning to use <firestarter> to manage the incoming and outgoing network connections. Please give me some valuable read abouts and tips about this package. - Will it be a good choice for network management? What are the other options? If i choose to install Firestarter : - Have you installed and used Firestarter in CentO 5.5? If yes,Please share the process of installation.

> I tried your suggestions without success. ip-up.local is executable in > a bash console and if I do so, I get this message: "iptables v1.3.5: > invalid mask '255' specified Try 'iptables -h' for more information. > A subent mask of 255? In my opinion it should be something like > <address>/24 or 255.255.255.0. > Seems to me that your settings are not

Hello, I see manage of firewall in CentOS (called security), and seems difficult to manage, not enough powerful. I am searching a middle term between scripts of iptables to manage and Security manager of CentOS. I know FireStarter, another similar? -- Devel in Precio http://www.pas-world.com

Hello all, I''m somewhat new to networking, and I''m having trouble masquerading connections that are coming over a bridge. The bridge only has a single port for now, but I''m going to add more ports later. I''m basing my configuration on the two-interface quick start guide. I''m using Shorewall 3.0.4 on Ubuntu Dapper. My network looks like this: * The

I need a decent, easy, firewall on Centos. This is for test systems, so I do not need a lot. For 'a lot', I use and Astaro firewall. I had used Firestarter once, but found out that it cannot handle routing between a public and private network. Basically saying this is impossible. Of course, if your private network is addressed per RFC 1918 (that I co-authored), I can understand

I am looking into different firewall tools. Well, I am looking to turn my Centos notebook into a NAT box, so that I can plug my corp notebook into its ethernet, and get access through my Centos notebook's wireless connection. (yes the corp notebook has wireless, but they frown on us using it!) I have started with Shorewall via webmin. I suspect that since my main firewall is Astaro, I

Hi All, I want to build a dedicated firewall/router as I am launching a NPO and I can host this in my garage. (Comcast offered me a 100 x 20 circuit for $99/mo with 5 statics) I used to run Untangle, but as of version 9, you are forced to use their build in protocol policies versus the firewalling I am used to (Deny All and then opening holes for specific IP's, etc). There are so many

Evening all: Thought I'd announce myself with a question about setting up sources.list to be able to begin download and install of R. Running version 7.10 of Ubuntu. (Tried 8.04 but found it slow and finicky with my hardware. Perhaps will try 8.10 or above, but that's a thought for another time.) Followed the notes on the R site and added the following lines to my sources.list: deb

Everytime I see this in the logs my internet access stops for about 5 minutes. Nothing else follows in the logs. I have DSL. Any ideas? Aug 15 17:14:56 bonsai gconfd (root-6095): starting (version 2.14.0), pid 6095 user 'root' Aug 15 17:14:56 bonsai gconfd (root-6095): Resolved address "xml:readonly:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.mandatory" to a read-only configuration source at position

What is the best VPN solution for both PC and iPad? I was told that OpenVPN won't work for iPad. Ed Warner

Well I think this system is back on 3.5. How do I tell? Have not used it in a while... I need a NAT for some quick testing and this box was available. Only a 6gb drive, so I can't install Astaro (which I have licenses for). So is there a simple way to turn on NATing? Should I upgrade to 4.2? This box is behind a firewall, so security risks are not the issue. This time.

>Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:28:05 -0400 >From: "ryanag@zoominternet.net" <ryanag@zoominternet.net> >Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] dumb, dumb question **follow-up on > support-request documentation** >To: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> >Cc: Mailing List for Shorewall Users > <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> >Message-ID:

Hi, I'm using the generic system-config-securitylevel-tui program on a remote server to configure my firewall. So far it's been fairly decent, allowing me to open up ports and whatnot. But I want to start blocking a couple of outgoing ports on my machine. I want to lock it down so the only traffic going in our out of my machine is stuff that I specify. Is there a way to do this

(anonymous post) I have a simple 2 interface firewall setup and all is good, almost. I am hosting virtual websites and DNS behind shorewall no problem. However I am trying to use SFTP via a different port number and have no luck even though Putty works well. Is there anything weird to sftp and shorewall? My lab uses a different firewall (firestarter) and it works OK. I am using; DNAT net

Who would / Who wouldnt need to run SELinux? I have linux server at home. Would I need to run SELinux? What are the advantages of SELinux? What is the average home user doing?

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |pablo at netfilter.org Resolution|

I've read a number of articles, googled the web for a few months and now attempting at turning my CentOS box into a gateway for the third time. Configured my dhcpd.conf and other related files and all seems to be working, I can have my M$ desktop leasing an ip address and all. The problem is when I want to go out to the internet I keep on getting the Request Timed out error. I'm pretty

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # Tagging bugs related to IPv6 support according to bug title (and checked for false positive) > # Maintainer, sorry if you consider the tag as not relevant > tag 561835 +ipv6 Bug #561835 [openjdk-6-jdk] josm: net.ipv6.bindv6only=1 breaks OSM access Added tag(s) ipv6. > tag 560837 +ipv6 Bug #560837 {Done: Krzysztof Krzy??aniak

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # Tagging bugs related to IPv6 support according to bug title (and checked for false positive) > # Maintainer, sorry if you consider the tag as not relevant > tag 561835 +ipv6 Bug #561835 [openjdk-6-jdk] josm: net.ipv6.bindv6only=1 breaks OSM access Added tag(s) ipv6. > tag 560837 +ipv6 Bug #560837 {Done: Krzysztof Krzy??aniak

Dear list members, Masquerading does''not work for me. This is a Mandrake Linux 10 system, but I use another kernel, that included in the original distribution (original: 2.6.3, now used 2.6.8 because of a lot of suck with OpenSwan with kernels prior 2.6.4). The problem seems to be similar or identical mentioned here: