similar to: Routing issue - Revisited

On Thu, February 19, 2015 12:33, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:48 AM, James B. Byrne > <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: >> >>> I added these directives to the route-eth0:192 file: >>> >>> ADDRESS0=192.168.6.9 >>> NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 >>> GATEWAY0=192.168.6.1 >>> >> >> Which should have been:

On Thu, February 19, 2015 10:19, James B. Byrne wrote: > > I added these directives to the route-eth0:192 file: > > ADDRESS0=192.168.6.9 > NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 > GATEWAY0=192.168.6.1 > Which should have been: ADDRESS0=192.168.6.0 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY0=192.168.6.1 Sigh. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne

On Wed, February 18, 2015 13:07, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:39 AM, James B. Byrne > <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: >> 2. How does one configure the routing table on network startup to >> specifically detail the route particular addresses are supposed to >> take? >> > > Not exactly sure how routing works with aliases on the same

On Mar 12, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Jason Warr <jason at warr.net> wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:43:27 -0500, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > >> I found: >> >> http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/configuring-static-routes-in-debian-or-red-hat-linux-systems.html >> >> where it says to add to ifcfg-eth0: >> >>

I want to add the following route command route add -net 192.168.2.0/27 gw 192.168.2.3 via the normal network setup. The result should be the following routing table (the first line): 192.168.2.0/27 via 192.168.2.3 dev xenbr1 scope link 192.168.2.0/27 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.4 192.168.2.0/27 dev xenbr1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.3 192.168.1.0/24 dev xenbr0

Hi, I'd want to configure persistent static routes, ie in config files, but I can't configure static routes, I tested: [root at centos7 ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/routes-enp0s3 ADDRESS0=10.10.10.0 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY0=192.168.1.1 logs says nothing: ago 27 15:38:29 centos7.vhgroup.corp NetworkManager[2299]: <info> Activation (enp0s3) Stage 5 of 5 (IPv4

Dear Friends I have 2 netcards (eth0 to Internet and eth1 to internal network) in CENTOS 4.2, bit when I boot system the up eth0 and et1i [OK]. When I run ifconfig the eth1 has not IP configure, then I run command ifdown eth1 and ifup eth1, after eth1 is work perfect. Below I show file /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 # Please read /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt # for

Hello List, I have one network card and added two IP-Adresses to it: eth1 192.168.1.1/24 eth1:1 10.1.2.3/24 a want to use static routes on device eth1:1 and added one in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth1:1: GATEWAY0=10.1.2.4 ADDRESS0=10.2.2.0 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 What the network-script should execute in background is: ip route add 10.2.2.0/24 via 10.1.2.4 dev eth1 but it executes

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:43:27 -0500, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > I know how to use 'ip' to set up a static route, e.g.: > > ip route add 192.168.128.0/17 via 40.53.24.3 dev eth0 > > But if you reboot or restart network, you loose this. Thus you have to > make it persistant. I found: > >

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Mar 12, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Jason Warr <jason at warr.net> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:43:27 -0500, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >> >>> I found: >>> >>>

On 03/12/2015 03:51 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> On Mar 12, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Jason Warr <jason at warr.net> wrote: >>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:43:27 -0500, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I found: >>>> >>>>

I had a major HD failure and need to rebuild my host server and the virtual servers that resided on it. I am moving from CentOS 5.6 to CentOS 6.3. I am using the same configuration, as best as I can tell, that was working only hours ago on 5.6 but does not work on 6.3. My guest server can see network traffic on the bridged network device but I cannot seem to interact with it. Iptables turned

I do get problems with name resolution accross subnet bounderies. I have a working and wins server and to demonstrate the problem I paste the debug output of mount /smbhome/ opts: uid=1000 opts: gid=1000 mount.smbfs started (version 2.2.2debian-2) added interface ip=192.168.6.2 bcast=192.168.6.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name Tri-st-s001<0x20>

Greetings all, OK - just started playing around with traffic shaping - have imq and htb and (I think) everything else I need in the kernel and running well. My initial lab task was to protect a H.323 session over a simulated half T1 while adding bulk traffic - got that accomplished after slogging through learning tc and decided in short order that a more intuitive interface would be

Hi list, First let me give something about my network structure 192.168.4.0-->192.168.4.3(BDC) | VPN GATEWAY | Internet | VPN GATEWAY | 192.168.5.0-->192.168.5.3 (PDC) Right now I'm having 192.168.5.3(SAMBA+LDAP PDC) and WINS server, and I want to build a BDC (192.168.4.3) on the other side of the VPN. my questions are: 1. is it possible? 2. is BDC needs to be setup as a WINS server

Guus, Thank you for your help (a)>>You said:- First, if you are already using "ip" to assign an address..... Why should I use "ip route" instead of "route add..." Surely both write same to the Routing table? (b) My problem was, that Tinc servers could not ping remote clients, whereas clients could ping successfully across VPNWhen pinging Client to Client

Thank you, Parke and Guus. I have now understood and got it working. Because of my beginner belief, I assumed that the tinc vpn end points needed to be on the same network. I have now discovered that the tinc vpn IP end points addresses can be arbitrary, and different! So I have set the end points to be local to the LAN they connect, and added on each tinc server a dev route to ensure

I am having an issue with a new samba setup. My gateway server (H1 - the new setup) is running Samba and acting as my networks wins server. It also houses my email and web server. It is connected to a private network to another server (H3) running Samba acting as my main file server. The issue that I am experiencing is that H3 can view our webpage that is hosted on H1 but my Windows machines

I have a three tinc server setup, similar to "4.3 How Connections Work" using the configuration mostly likehttp://ostolc.org/site-to-site-vpn-with-tinc.html The clients (Ubuntus, Debians and Windows 10s) can all ping (and SSH) to each other remotely. As far as that is concerned it's working great - thanks so much for some great software. However, on each of the Tinc servers (A and

[andy@fw andy]$ echo "hello" | telnet 192.168.4.1 139 Trying 192.168.4.1... Connected to 192.168.4.1. Escape character is '^]'. Connection closed by foreign host. [andy@fw andy]$ echo "hello" | telnet 64.218.*.* Trying 64.218.*.*... Connected to 64.218.*.*. Escape character is '^]'. Connection closed by foreign host. [andy@fw andy]$ Originally I got one of the