similar to: Howto change arch for FirebirdSS rpm

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1731 Summary: Obsolete BuildPreReq in contrib/redhat/openssh.spec Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.4p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

Attached is a spec file for OpenSSH on SuSE 6.4 and 7.0 systems. It differs from the current spec file in the following details: - Only one rpm file is created containing client and server files. - PreReq `openssl-devel' is changed to `openssl'. - Path '/usr/libexec/ssh' is changed to '/usr/lib/ssh' for ssh-askpass and gnome-ssh-askpass. The resulting

Hello all, There are two issues in OpenSSH RPM Red Hat spec file (against 2.2.0p1): 1. /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd uses 'success' and 'failure'. These don't work in Red Hat 5.2; else the spec file is fine. Initscripts requirement (for the one in RH60) added. 2. If you're upgrading over SSH ltd's ssh-server, the server will be stopped and sshd removed from chkconfig

. . . . hmod a+x mkdiskimage make -C sample all make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/syslinux-2.08/sample' pngtopnm syslogo.png | \ ../ppmtolss16 \#000000=0 \#d0d0d0=7 \#f6f6f6=15 \ > syslogo.lss /bin/sh: pngtopnm: command not found ../ppmtolss16: stdin is not a PNM file at ../ppmtolss16 line 215. make[1]: *** [syslogo.lss] Error 255 make[1]: Leaving directory

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295 Summary: rpm specfile needs build prereqs for Kerberos Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

I decided to try openssh 3.3p1 on my Mandrake box that's lacking a complete install of kerberos. Installed the SRPM, ran rpm -bb openssh.spec and it bombed. Made it through the configure stage and moved onto compilation, where it barfed because it couldn't find the kerberos headers (I had krb5-libs installed, but not krb5-devel). Attached is a small little patch to the spec file to add

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=631 Summary: Build fails on Redhat Linux 6.x Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.6.1p2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Build system AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: mdobel at

I am taking the liberty of forwarding this message to the list. I am not subscribed to it. If you want to reply to me, please send email to faheem at email.unc.edu Thanks, Faheem Mitha. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Faheem Mitha <faheem at email.unc.edu> Newsgroups: comp.security.ssh Subject: installing OpenSSH rpm on SuSE 6.2 Dear people, I tried

Hi People, I have just started building my own RPMS on both Fedora and CentOS and generally things have gone well. Currently I am trying to create RPMS for some commercial software that we have purchased. Step 1 was install the software using its JAVA Based installer ensuring that all files were installed into a particular directory in /usr/local. Step 2 was create a tar file of the

Hello, I need adddriver to samba network printer, but I have problem with too many driver depend files in it. String with files is 1928 char long I am receiving this message: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (1024 - 1023) in safe_strcpy [adddriver "Windows NT x86" "Canon PIXMA iP4000":CN] this is my attempt: rpcclient -U 'admin%passwd' -c 'adddriver "Windows NT

I have a couple of questions regarding openssh.spec and the rpm that gets generated from it. I am using 2.3.0p1 1. Why is openssl a prereq? openssh statically links to openssl during build by default (rightfully so, you don't want your security library a shared object if possible) 2. I don't understand the following line in the spec file during the install step (it makes it not build for

Hi I have problem with smbclient in samba3 rc2, rc4. When I start tar backup with it: smbclient //comp-32/volume pass -U user -d0 -Tc /dev/tape0 > /dev/null [2003/09/23 08:27:46, 0] client/clitar.c:do_tar(830) directory \Kart-32\ [2003/09/23 08:27:46, 0] client/clitar.c:do_tar(830) directory \Kart-32\mairs\ [2003/09/23 08:27:46, 0]

I grabbed the latest ImageMagick.src.rpm (version 6.3.6, I believe) from imagemagic.org and verified that I can compile it by hand on CentOS 3. I then commented out all the BuildPrereq and BuildRequires lines and verified that "rpmbuild -bc ImageMagick.spec" behaved sensibly. However, when I try to run "rpmbuild -bb ImageMagick.spec" I get a failure not because of any

Hi I am trying to upgrde ?out openldap ver 2.3 ?to the lastest version 2.4, howevre there is no rpm avaibale for 2.4 so i decide to create my own for centOS flavour 5.2 here is the ?part look of my spec file openldap.spec Summary: openldap Installer Name: openldap Version: 2.4 Release: 1 Vendor: net Solutions License: Commercial Group: ms6 BuildRoot: /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/openldap Provides:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001 Summary: Error on MAKE while compiling SRPMS and tar.gz but not while installing RPMS Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: ssh

Outside the known 'Hang-on-exit' bug and the Solaris 'PAM_TTY_KLUDGE' required. *WHAT* other issues *MUST* be address before 3.0 which is approaching fast? Those running NeXTStep I need conformation that it works under NeXT. My current Slab is packed in a storage unit due to a fire in my apartment complex (happened above me so I'm wrapping up dealing with that crap =). -

I have an rpm I've created that has a dependency on a library provided by a third party. This dependency is not specified anywhere in my spec file yet the package seems to know about when I run: # rpm -qip --requires MyPackage.rpm The third party rpm is installed and uninstalled via a vendor-supplied script so that they can prompt you to accept licenses and so on. Problem is, the vendor

http://bass.directhit.com/openssh_snap/ Starting tonight I plan on tracking changes very closely with the OpenBSD tree. I need people to test the latest snapshot (9/14 at of right now) and report success or failure on compiling. I am starting this now because we are looking at a code freeze soon and I really want to ensure it compiles and runs on all existing platforms. So we (the portable

Hello all, OpenSSL 0.9.5a and 0.9.6 are incompatible, causing weird errors. I'd like to get a check for this in the RPMs. However, now I want to make sure whether anyone has experienced problems with RHL 0.9.5a OpenSSL libs vs. the 0.9.5a ones provided at openbsd.org? Ie: is it enough to check like '= 0.9.5a' or do you have to check '= 0.9.5a-xyz'. -- Pekka Savola

I have just uploaded another snapshot to: http://www.mindrot.org/misc/openssh/openssh-SNAP-20001028.tar.gz Please test this one extra hard, it is likely to become 2.3.0p1 early next week. Regards, Damien Miller -- | ``We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on | Damien Miller - | a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the | <djm at mindrot.org> | works of