similar to: Spec failing [Possible Bug with kind_of? and instance_of?]

Im making forum and i have problem with paths. Here is code: http://pastie.caboo.se/6389 With this code, it works. But its a bit weird to use so many paths function. For every path i need to make new function. So can you suggest me something. Tables are like here: http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/ForumExample -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I''m trying to use it_should_behave_like, and something seems to be wonky with the syntax. When I add :shared=>true, the DSL complains that the next line is the fixture declaration: /vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/dsl/behaviour_eval.rb:137:in `method_missing'': undefined method `fixtures'' for #<Spec::DSL::EvalModule:0x324a2cc> (NoMethodError) Here''s the

Hello all, I''m currently having an issue with some specs, specifically scope issues (probably more of a scope issue than a spec issue at this point)... Here''s the error: ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch in ''A new User should know what role it has'' Role expected, got NilClass D:/ruby/projects/restful_authentication_test/config/../app/models/role.rb:5:in

How would you spec out something like the following: def a_method x = Class.new do include Enumerable end # do something here with x end describe "The Anonymous Class" do before :each do @anonymous_class = mock Class Class.stub!(:new).and_return @anonymous_class end it "should create a new anonymous class" do

Hey! I have implemented a quick solution for the should != .. , should ! ~ ... ''problem''. It uses source code inspection (I think it''s the only way) and i''ve done some benchmarking to see if it''s really that slow. A direct comparison of running ''1.should == 1'' with the unmodified rspec source against the rspec-version with

i''m having problem with a form_for situation where i''m trying to DRY out the repeated parts of my forms and put them in common/form and render the form elements via another partial in controller_name/_form. Here''s the first form # app/views/common/form <% form_for ... do |f| -%> <%= render :partial => "params[:controller]/form", :object => f

Hi all, I feel like I''m missing something really easy and I''m just not seeing it. I''m using the restful_authentication plugin and have a User model. Uesr has_many :things and Thing belongs_to :user. That''s it. I did a "script/generate rspec_scaffold thing" to generate all the necessary bits. The "rake db:migrate" to create the db. At

Here''s a controller spec I wrote, it''s for a very simple RESTful controller (well, aren''t all RESTful controllers simple? :) I''ve created a couple spec helper methods to refactor some of the common code...for example, require_login_and_correct_user creates two specifications: one for when the user isn''t logged in, and one when the user is logged in but

On 5/28/07, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote: > The behaviour you''re trying to describe is that the User should > require that passwords bear certain qualities - in this case a length > between 5 and 40. So you need to ask yourself how the User should > behave when this requirement is violated, and then specify that it > behaves that way. > >

I''m trying to mock a object to raise a certain error. By doing so I get a ArgumentError on ActiveRecord''s save! method: http://pastie.caboo.se/85628 I''ve tried to debug it but just can''t seem to find what I''m doing wrong. Any help is greatly appreciated. Cheers, Eivind Uggedal

Hello, I have problems with this spec controllers: http://pastie.caboo.se/68634 when I run: rake spec:controllers I get this error: ...............F...... 1) ''DocTypeController should update and redirect to show'' FAILED expected redirect to {:action=>"show", :id=>1}, got redirect to

I recently wrote a matcher for testing AR associations which allows you to specify things like: Foo.should have_many(:bars).through(:bazes) I''m pretty darned proud of it and a couple of people have suggested that I should submit it to the rspec_on_rails project. Before I go to the trouble of writing out rdoc and fully spec''ing it, I just wanted to make sure this was

Hi, I just put in a patch that allows you to DRY up this: <%= link_to @company.name, @company %> to this: <%= link_to :name, @company %> The symbol indicates the method to be called on the object passed in the link_to options. http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8789 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Hi everyone, I''m trying this in my helper spec and it didn''t work: @curr_odontogram.should_receive(''photos[1]'').and_return(@photo) and the error is: SyntaxError in ''PersonHelper Deberia devolverme un link para eliminar una foto'' compile error /home/gramos/src/rails/r-dental/config/../vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/mocks/proxy.rb:99: syntax

Hello, I haven''t been able to create a controller spec. You can see the code here: http://pastie.caboo.se/67980 The error message I''m getting is: Spec::Mocks::MockExpectationError in ''PersonController should tell the Person model to create a new person on POST to create'' Mock ''person'' received unexpected message :save with (no args)

[from out-of-band communication with steven, just for the record] Hi! On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 01:47:49PM +0200, Steven Garcia wrote: > Hey Jens, > [..] > > 1. Is the Search model just an Active Record object or do I need to > set up a database for it as well (if so then with what columns)? No, that search model is just a plain class that backs your search form. If you want to

The following works: it "should evaluate a passed in block in the context of the interview object" do block = Proc.new { raise unless self.is_a? (Interview) }.should_not raise_error Interview.create(:title => "Text", &block) end However, the following does not: it "should evaluate a passed in block in the context of the interview

So I have message model and each user has many messages. When I run user.messages in the console it returns correctly, however in the test it returns and empty collection? Any thoughts. All the sql is being generate correctly, I checked the log. Here''s a pastie with the code in question. http://pastie.caboo.se/84337 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received

Hello to the list and thanks to Aaron for the cool software. I''ve been fooling around with Mechanize and Hpricot for a couple of days and from the docs I''ve read, the following code SHOULD work but doesn''t. I''ve tried the same code on a couple of different sites and I get the same exception for each. Any pointers or suggestions are appreciated.

I haven''t been spec''ing lately, but been hopping back on and adding autotest. However I get an error: http://pastie.caboo.se/177538/wrap I also noticed a post by Scott and there was mention of rspec_autotest. Is this is what everyone is using? http://svn.caldersphere.net/svn/main/plugins/rspec_autotest/