Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Possible bug in yum requirements handling with yum-priorities"
2009 Jun 10
1
yum --allow-downgrade and versionlocking not working
with installed version 1.3.7 from rpmforge
yum --allow-downgrade update rrdtool-1.2.30-1.el5.rf
results in "no packages to update"
yum --allow-downgrade install rrdtool-1.2.30-1.el5.rf
says "already installed"
So, how am I supposed to use --allow-downgrade then?
I had to rpm -e --nodeps the newer packages to be able to install the
older packages. Now I want to lock the
2008 Jan 10
4
yum hangs when Reading Local RPMDB
All of a sudden yum hangs on a Centos 4.5 (updated to the latest patch
before 4.6) when I try to use it. "clean metadata" didn't help.
The output of -d5 shows it gets to the point of "Reading Local RPMDB" and
then sits there. The process doesn't die, but doesn't seem to do anything
from that point on. strace shows this: futex(0xb76dcae8, FUTEX_WAIT, 2,
NULL
I
2020 Jan 22
0
YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8
On 1/21/20 10:10 AM, david wrote:
> At 08:52 AM 1/21/2020, David G. Miller wrote:
>
>
>> On 1/21/20 9:35 AM, david wrote:
>>> Folks
>>>
>>> In a test Centos 8 installation as a guest of VirtualBox on Windows
>>> 10, I want to install ffmpeg, and support for exfat. They're not in
>>> the standard distribution (as far as I know), so I
2020 Jan 22
0
YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8
At 08:05 PM 1/21/2020, you wrote:
> > On 1/21/20 10:10 AM, david wrote:
> >> At 08:52 AM 1/21/2020, David G. Miller wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 1/21/20 9:35 AM, david wrote:
> >>>> Folks
> >>>>
> >>>> In a test Centos 8 installation as a guest of VirtualBox on Windows
> >>>> 10, I want to install
2008 Jul 03
1
rpmforge-release install/rpm problem
I wanted to install the rpmforge-release package on a new install and get
the following. Do others have the same problem?
b51:~ rpm -ivvvvvvvh http://packages.sw.be/rpmforge-release/rpmforge-
release-0.3.6-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm
Retrieving http://packages.sw.be/rpmforge-release/rpmforge-release-0.3.6-
1.el5.rf.i386.rpm
D: ... as /var/tmp/rpm-xfer.qQEt9n
D: failed to open
2007 Aug 26
1
rpmforge checksum errors
Almost each time I want to use rpmforge with yum I get a "Metadata file
does not meet checksum" error. Yum usually has to try at least five
mirrors before it succeeds, sometimes it doesn't find a mirror with a
useable file. This is with CentOS 5. Is this a known issue with rpmforge
lately?
Kai
--
Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
2020 Jan 24
0
(SOLVED) YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8
On 1/23/20 4:20 PM, david wrote:
> At 03:46 PM 1/23/2020, Nataraj wrote:
>> On 1/23/20 2:29 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>> >
>> > I would agree.?? I have the same behavior in a Redhat 8 development
>> > system, so it's not a problem with the Centos build.?? I have not
>> added
>> > any repositories other then the Redhat
>> >
2006 May 04
4
differences between yum update and yum check-update
yum check-update:
clamav.i386 0.88.1-1.el4.kb kbs-CentOS-Extra
clamav-data.i386 0.88.1-1.el4.kb kbs-CentOS-Extra
clamav-lib.i386 0.88.1-1.el4.kb kbs-CentOS-Extra
clamav-update.i386 0.88.1-1.el4.kb kbs-CentOS-Extra
yum update:
Installing:
clamav-db i386 0.88.2-1.el4.rf rpmforge 4.0 M
replacing
2009 Jun 10
2
munin stopped working
Just noticed that my munin installation stopped showing any data after the
last "big" update. I installed a lot of updates for CentoS, but there was
also a munin update coming from rpmforge. However, in yum.log there is no
munin listed. But I'm sure I updated munin to 1.2.5-2.el5.rf as well. Does
yum log only the centos repo's?
The problem seems to be with the creation of
2020 Jan 22
0
YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 08:35:14AM -0800, david wrote:
> yum list installed
>
> and the following diagnostics occur:
> -------------------------------
> Modular dependency problems:
>
> Problem 1: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides module(perl:5.26) needed by module
> perl-App-cpanminus:1.7044:8010020191120175858:a9207fc6-0.x86_64
> Problem 2:
2015 Dec 26
1
Perl DBI 1.52 on el6
Hello guys,
I was told by the client to install Perl DBI version 1.52 on a el6 box, by
default el6 branch comes with DBI version 1.6x, this version is AFAIK not
the desired one.
First I tried installing DBI 1.52 from some rpm package [1], which had some
dependencies, Perl 5.8.8 and dbd.4.4.x, this last package was also present
el6, so it made conflict and it was not possible to install DBI 1.52
2020 Jan 22
4
YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8
> On 1/21/20 10:10 AM, david wrote:
>> At 08:52 AM 1/21/2020, David G. Miller wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 1/21/20 9:35 AM, david wrote:
>>>> Folks
>>>>
>>>> In a test Centos 8 installation as a guest of VirtualBox on Windows
>>>> 10, I want to install ffmpeg, and support for exfat. They're not in
>>>> the
2008 Jul 12
1
using new sysconfig file
I installed postgrey from rpmforge and wanted to use sysconfig to change
options instead of overwriting the init file. However, I get a weird
warning from postgrey. I'm not sure if this is a postgrey quirk or I use
sysconfig the wrong way.
/etc/sysconfig/postgrey:
OPTIONS="--unix=/var/spool/postfix/postgrey/socket --delay=660"
/etc/rc.d/init.d/postgrey:
2020 Jan 23
0
YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8
On 1/23/20 2:29 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>
> I would agree.? I have the same behavior in a Redhat 8 development
> system, so it's not a problem with the Centos build.? I have not added
> any repositories other then the Redhat
> codeready-builder-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms. I original installed 8.0 and
> have applied all updates.? I did not notice the problem until recently.
>
> #
2008 Oct 08
2
rpmforge, perl-dbd-mysql, yum, priorities, centos, and you
rpmforge has just released a new perl-DBD-mysql for el4 that has an
obsoletes against perl-DBD-MySQL and the protectbase yum plugin doesn't
grok obsoletes. the priorities plugin does. so if you are having issues
with this, install the yum-plugin-priorities first, make sure that the
CentOS-Base repo is priority 1 and the rpmforge repo is priority 2 or
higher (99 is the default).
also,
2008 Jul 23
1
[Fwd: Re: fail2ban needs shorewall?]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I've used denyhosts.
If you do have an issue with fail2ban, it does pretty much the same thing.
Andy
- -------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [CentOS] fail2ban needs shorewall?
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:08:07 +0200
From: Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com>
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
To:
2008 Mar 26
1
yum: removing Java group fails
I did a "yum groupremove Java" and that failed "somehow". Yum listed all
group members as "erased", but some rpm packages failed because of missing
config files or so. As a result none of the 50 packages were removed from
the rpm database, but all of their files seem to have been removed.
How can I clean them out from the rpm db?
Kai
--
Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin,
2008 Jun 28
1
New yum search behavior is awful/useless
Anyone already tried yum search after the 5.2 upgrade?
yum search perl-MIME-tools
<skipped some stuff>
perl-MIME-tools.noarch : Perl modules for parsing (and creating!) MIME
entities
perl-MIME-tools.noarch : Perl modules for parsing (and creating!) MIME
entities
perl-MIME-tools.noarch : Perl modules for parsing (and creating!) MIME
entities
That *used* to tell if it's installed (and
2006 Mar 31
4
Sorting of passwd/group files
Is there a program on CentOS which will sort my passwd/group etc. files by
username or uid/gid? On Suse I can do this with a sysconfig switch and
Suseconfig, is there something similar on RH-based systems?
Kai
--
Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
2020 Jan 24
2
(SOLVED) YUM (DNF) Possible Confusion Centos 8
At 03:46 PM 1/23/2020, Nataraj wrote:
>On 1/23/20 2:29 PM, Nataraj wrote:
> >
> > I would agree.? I have the same behavior in a Redhat 8 development
> > system, so it's not a problem with the Centos build.? I have not added
> > any repositories other then the Redhat
> > codeready-builder-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms. I original installed 8.0 and
> > have