similar to: IPv6 forwarding and ip6tables

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "IPv6 forwarding and ip6tables"

2009 Feb 20
0
ip6tables forwarding rule
I have 2 boxes that act as IPv6 routers. One with 2 physical interfaces, the other with 6 vlan ''interfaces'' on one physical interface plus a second physical interface. On both systems I have in /etc/sysconfig/network IPV6FORWARDING=yes But if I have my ''basic'' ip6tables service running, only ICMP messages get through. Since both of these boxes are
2013 Jun 28
0
IPv6 two or more providers, duplicating routing table does not work
Hello, shorewall6 seem to have problems duplicating the main routing table. shorewall6 tries to add the fe80::/64 route of every ipv6 configured interface to routing table 1. The first route applies but the other ones not. If i try to add the routes manually to routing table 1 i have to add the first fe80::/64 route and append not add the other ones. does not work: ip -6 route add table 1
2009 Dec 06
6
shorewall6-lite's shorecap sourcing /usr/share/shorewall-lite/lib.base?
Hey all, Just a sanity check, but should the shorecap script in shorewall6-lite be sourcing /usr/share/shorewall6-lite/lib.base rather than /usr/share/shorewall-lite/lib.base like it does currently? In fact shouldn''t there be a general s/shorewall-lite/shorewall6-lite/ in shorecap in shorewall6-lite? Maybe there is more of that lurking about as well. Also, the first line of the
2011 Sep 27
3
[Bug 751] New: IPv6 bridging bug
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 Summary: IPv6 bridging bug Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ip6tables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy: david at
2013 Nov 19
7
IPv6 connections won't be rejected nor logged
Hi, I have servers where shorewall6 won''t reject nor log: # cat /etc/shorewall6/zones fw firewall net ipv6 # cat /etc/shorewall6/interfaces net eth1 tcpflags (I also tried without "tcpflags", but no changes) # cat /etc/shorewall6/policy $FW all ACCEPT all all REJECT info # cat /etc/shorewall6/rules SECTION NEW (for testing, I removed all the rules) I am testing from
2009 Mar 10
1
IPv6 under Centos?
I wonder if anyone is running IPv6 under Centos-5.2? Particularly with shorewall? I see that shorewall6 is specifically designed for updating shorewall to IPv6, as described in <http://www.shorewall.net/IPv6Support.html>. Unfortunately, this explicity requires kernel 2.6.25 or later, and iptables 1.4.0 or later, both of which are later than any versions I've seen on a Centos
2014 Oct 04
2
Assigning IPv6 address to guest
Hello, I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the following guide, unsuccessfully: https://www.berrange.com/posts/2011/06/16/providing-ipv6-connectivity-to-virtual-guests-with-libvirt-and-kvm/ . I have the following config files: dumpxml of the guest `deb`: http://sprunge.us/iUef net-dumpxml of network `default`: http://sprunge.us/WTfH net-dumpxml of network `ip6`:
2008 Jul 10
0
IPv6 static routing
So I do not want to run radvd on my public subnet (between the gateway and firewall). I am trying to set up the firewall's public interface. For now in ifcfg-eth0 I have the lines: DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static HWADDR=00:40:F4:05:A8:F1 IPV6INIT=yes IPV6_AUTOCONF=no IPV6ADDR="2607:F4B8:3:1:0:40:F405:A8F1" ONBOOT=yes And in network I have: NETWORKING=yes NETWORKING_IPV6=yes
2014 Oct 04
0
Re: Assigning IPv6 address to guest
On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the > following guide, unsuccessfully: > https://www.berrange.com/posts/2011/06/16/providing-ipv6-connectivity-to-virtual-guests-with-libvirt-and-kvm/ > . > > I have the following config files: > dumpxml of the guest `deb`: http://sprunge.us/iUef >
2011 Aug 29
2
[Bug 742] New: ip6tables "-m iprange" ipv6 range detection
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742 Summary: ip6tables "-m iprange" ipv6 range detection Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: SuSE Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: ip6_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:
2009 Jun 10
1
IPv6 range provisioning question
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A few months back, I tried to use the network scripts to provision an IPv6 range like can be done with IPv4. I was using CentOS 5.2 at the time and was informed that 5.2 was broken in this regard. I have upgraded to CentOS 5.3 now and I am trying to get IPv6 to provision an entire range of IPs, but I am still getting the old behavior and no IPs are
2011 Jan 11
1
IPv6, HE tunnel and ip6tables problems
CentOS 5.5, fully patched. I have a HE tunnel (tunnelbroker.net) IPv6 tunnel. This works pretty well and is simple to setup. Everything works fine. Until I try to set up an ip6tables firewall. eg if I try to view https://dnssec.surfnet.nl/?p=464 then the page never displays and the firewall shows kernel: IN=sit1 OUT=eth0 SRC=2001:0610:0001:40cd:0145:0100:0186:0033 DST=my.machine LEN=80 TC=0
2014 Oct 04
0
Re: Assigning IPv6 address to guest
On 04/10/14 21:13, The Cop wrote: > > On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: >> On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >>> following guide, unsuccessfully: >>> >
2019 Mar 01
2
[Bug 1324] New: with kernel 4.20.11 ip6table REDIRECT, process listening on redirected port does not get a packet
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1324 Bug ID: 1324 Summary: with kernel 4.20.11 ip6table REDIRECT, process listening on redirected port does not get a packet Product: iptables Version: 1.6.x Hardware: All OS: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority:
2007 Apr 18
2
[Bridge] IPv6 + ip6tables packet bridging?
Hiyas, Is there a patch for the 2.4.x series to do ip6tables bridging of IPv6 packets? I was unable to go to 2.6 due to issues with large packets so still living in 2.4 land. If there are no patches, any ideas on what gets patched in IPv4 to allow this bridging? -Scott __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
2014 Oct 04
2
Re: Assigning IPv6 address to guest
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: > On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >> following guide, unsuccessfully: >> https://www.berrange.com/posts/2011/06/16/providing-ipv6-connectivity-to-virtual-guests-with-libvirt-and-kvm/
2020 Apr 28
3
Diagnosing IPv6 routing
On 4/28/2020 3:17 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > - gateway sends a router solicitation and gets a router advertisement > with "stateful config" set, which tells gateway to do DHCPv6 (but > default route comes from RA) I'm not seeing any outbound IPv6 traffic from my CentOS 7 box on the WAN interface. I do see RA's emitting from the LAN interface, from radvd. Is there
2014 Oct 05
1
Re: Assigning IPv6 address to guest
On 10/5/2014 1:56 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: > On 04/10/14 21:13, The Cop wrote: >> On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: >>> On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >>>> following guide, unsuccessfully: >>>> >>
2014 Jul 03
1
Miredo server for Centos 6
On delving deeper into Miredo support, it seems that Miredo Server is a separate program from the Miredo client/relay. And that there is no Miredo Server available for Centos 6. Not in EPEL 6, or repoforge. So far the maintainer of Miredo for Fedora/EPEL has not reponded to a query on its status for EPEL 6. I have to ask on repoforge about miredo-server. Anyone know of anywhere else to
2010 Mar 23
0
Processed: Re: Processed: ipv6 release goal
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > ## dear clint. > ## > ## release goals are release goals and not release blockers. > ## please learn the difference and discuss this beforehand. > ## > ## thanks. > ## > > severity 382189 serious > ## > Bug #382189 [nbd-server] no IPv6 support > ## > Severity set to 'serious' from