similar to: DNS resolver over IPv6

> Try > > ping6 -I eth1 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8 Thanks for the response. I tried. However, It did not resolve.... # ping6 -I eth1 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8 PING 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8(2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8) from fe80::a00:27ff:fe03:5b8a eth1: 56 data bytes On 2015/11/13 2:22, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, ???? wrote: > >> Hello >>

I have 2 nodes nodeA and nodeB I'm using tinc 1.1pre11 -- nodeA(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) : $ ip -6 route fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 dev tun0 proto kernel metric 256 fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/64 dev tun0 metric 1024 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 $ ping6 fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 PING fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1:

Hello Because I did not send , and then retransmitted. I am using the CentOS5.7. In a state where the link down, I did a ping to the IPv4 and IPv6. IPv4 succeeds in ping. but, IPv6 is ping fails. Once confirmed by ifconfig, it did not have a Link-Local Address. At link down, Is the Link-Local Address not set? Leave the link down, Is there a way to avoid this? # ethtool eth1 Settings for eth1: ?

I've been trying out IPv6 networking with tinc and noticed that it will not route smaller segments than /48 If I try to run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc:dddd::/64 dev tun0 I get network unreachable However if I run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc::/48 dev tun0 it works fine Is this is a limitation in tinc or the kernel network stack itself? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hello, I'm running a CentOS 5.6 server through linode. I am atempting to configure it for ipv6, previously this had been done though not by me on a ubuntu box so the hardware can take it. I've got an ipv6 tunnel through Hurricane Electric and at a shell prompt have done the following: ifconfig sit0 up ifconfig sit0 inet6 tunnel ::IPV4 Address ifconfig sit1 up ifconfig sit1 inet6 add IPV6

Hi, I have a kvm host and I try to install a centos 6 guest with a static ip address. When I do a manual install I eventually get to the network configuration and if I enter IP, gateway and DNS Server I can ping6 the guest from the host and I can ping6 the guest from outside. I do not want to do manual installation, so I have to specify a url to a kickstart file, but to download it the network

Hi, I have a process which is running as a linux service and assigns IP addresses using netlink to configued interface in linux. For IPv4 addresses i do not see any issue with this assignment. When i try to assign an IPv6 address, the address gets assigned successfully to the interface, but the Neighbour Solication request received for that address is not responded with and hence ping6 from a

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: > On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >> following guide, unsuccessfully: >> https://www.berrange.com/posts/2011/06/16/providing-ipv6-connectivity-to-virtual-guests-with-libvirt-and-kvm/

Guus Sliepen [2016-05-24 11:26 +0200] : > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:17:07AM +0200, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: [...] > > A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/klaas/tinc-up > > ifconfig $INTERFACE inet6 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 prefixlen 80 > > route -6 add -host fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2:0:1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 > > route -6 add -net

On 10/5/2014 1:56 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: > On 04/10/14 21:13, The Cop wrote: >> On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: >>> On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >>>> following guide, unsuccessfully: >>>> >>

Hello I've got two prefixes, one /48 and one /64 let's say these two 2001:db8:0815::/48 2001:db8:4711:cafe::/64 the router has on it's ethernet interface the following to IPv6 addresses: 2001:db8:0815::1/48 2001:db8:4711:cafe::1/64 a windows box has 2001:db8:0815::17/48 and 2001:db8:0815::1 as it's gateway a linux box has 2001:db8:4711:cafe::11/64 and 2001:db8:4711:cafe::1 as

I can't get IPv6 routing to configure correctly despite everything I've read saying it should This is my network config on a fully-updated CentOS 5.8 system: # cat /etc/sysconfig/network NETWORKING=yes NETWORKING_IPV6=yes HOSTNAME=my.hostname.com GATEWAY=aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd IPV6_DEFAULTGW=2a02:aaaa.bbbb::1 IPV6_DEFAULTDEV=eth0 # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0

* sorry for the other schema, it came out a mess. I hope this one is understandable. hi: I have this 2 boxes set up like this: 2020::2/128 2020::254/128 3030::254/128 192.168.0.2/24 192.168.0.254/24 192.168.30.254/24 +-------+ eth0 eth3 +-------+

On 4/28/2020 4:22 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > What's in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-<name>? I wonder if you > have IPv6 disabled. Pasted below. V6 definitely works. I have a second server and gave it a WAN address and I can connect between them using their WAN addresses. That's what told me that my ip6tables weren't screwed up and that the problem lay elsewhere.

Hello, I am having a some problems getting SSHD to run on the Ipv6 interface. Interface/Ipv6 Address: ipv6.open-systems.org [kevin at satan kevin/xp-0.0.15] 536 $ping6 ipv6.open-systems.org PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 3ffe:1200:3028:ff01::cab --> 3ffe:1200:3028:ff01::caa 16 bytes from 3ffe:1200:3028:ff01::caa, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=73.96 ms sshd_config: ListenAddress

HI Folks, I've got two boxes that I recently moved from -stable to 9.1rc1. I did them one at a time, with about a week between the upgrades. After the first upgrade, I noticed something strange with networking but didn't really dig into it much. After the second upgrade immediately experiencing the same issues, I figured it seemed to be something related to 9.1rc1. What I am finding

I'm completely confused here and I'm hoping someone here has a setup they're willing to share, or help me configure things on my end. My connectivity is through Comcast, who unfortunately, does not offer ipv6 in my area. My connection goes like this: Comcast -> Motorola Surfboard Cable Router -> CentOS 6.5 server The CentOS server is multi-homed and manages the internal

I am doing some testing and am having to make many changes to /etc/hosts Is there a way to reload the /etc/hosts file without doing a service network restart? I hope that in a while I can run BIND with a bunch of faked-out zone files (did this once to crack a Vonage PAP2). But for right now, I cannot introduce BIND to the equation....

This has probably been discussed before, but since I'm new on the list I hope You have patience with me. I have a four brick distributed/replicated setup. The computers are multi-core 16GB memory and 2*2.0TB in raid1 SATA-disks locally. The nodes are connected by 1 GB ethernet. All nodes have glusterfs 3.3beta2 installed and they are running debian 6 64bit. The underlying filesystems are

Hi, I have a Dell T710 with 4 X 10G ethernet interfaces (2 X Dual port Intel 82599 cards). It is running FreeBSD RELENG_8 last updated on July 13. What I see is packet loss (0 - 40%) on IPv6 packets in vlans, when the machine is not the originator of the packets. Let me try to describe a little more. If a neigbouring machine ping6 it, there will be packet loss. If it act as a router for ipv6,