similar to: CentOS PPC architecture support

Hello, I originally sent it to centos at lists.centos.org, but it never seemd to reach the list. But sorry, if it's indeed a duplicate... Peter -------- Original Message ------- Hello, I would like to try CentOS on a PPC machine (a Pegasos http://www.pegasosppc.com ). http://www.centos.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=65 says, that a boot iso file can be downloaded, but I get a 404

Hello, I would like to try CentOS on a PPC machine (a Pegasos http://www.pegasosppc.com ). http://www.centos.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=65 says, that a boot iso file can be downloaded, but I get a 404 error for http://beta.centos.org/centos/4.0beta/isos/ppc/ Could you please point me to the right URL? Thanks, bye, Peter

Yep. This worked. Thanks! Why yum can't figure this out itself? On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 09/18/2017 08:18 AM, Armin Kunaschik wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm having problems updating from 7.3 to 7.4 on my ppc64 (IBM Power7 >> p770) installation. >> yum update stops with >> Error: Multilib

Hello, I'm having problems updating from 7.3 to 7.4 on my ppc64 (IBM Power7 p770) installation. yum update stops with Error: Multilib version problems found. [..] Protected multilib versions: systemd-libs-219-42.el7.ppc != systemd-libs-219-42.el7_4.1.ppc64 When I scroll back through the transaction check I see various package dependencies for *.ppc instead of *.ppc64. First appearance in

Hi I was just curious as to the status of the centos PPC version? I can't seem to find the download for it. Is it generally on the same track as the other architectures? Or a few versions behind? I was hoping to run hte same software as my other machines. Thanks! d -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Good morning. LLVM and clang can be built successfully on Fedora 12 PS3. On RC1, only one test failed. test/CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll On release_29 branch, all llvm tests can pass. (I don't mention clang tests :p ) ...Takumi Fedora release 12 (Constantine) Linux speedking.localdomain 2.6.32.23-170.fc12.ppc64 #1 SMP Mon Sep 27 17:09:35 UTC 2010 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux llvm

On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 20:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > Thanks! Do you happen to know where this needs to be changed in clang > or LLVM. The code that actually interprets the constraints, > generically, is in CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp, is clang > relying on that code, or is there some frontend code in clang itself > that is failing to initially interpret the string? If

Hi, Even now someone is actually installing (i see that from the ftp-server logs) the centos-4/ppc beta-version from announced place. You people have to stand up and _TELL_ me what kind of hardware _IS_ working, so we would know more than already know - 43p works. I can't believe that all those, who installs, does have 43p too? Please? Something, so if it's actually working on

On Mar 15, 2011, at 7:25 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi wrote: > Good morning. > Hi Nakamura, > LLVM and clang can be built successfully on Fedora 12 PS3. > Hooray! :-) > On RC1, only one test failed. > test/CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll > Eric commented that this should be fixed on the release branch right now. > On release_29 branch, all llvm tests can pass. Woo! :-) >

I''ve noticed some strangeness when using the InPlaceEditor. Here''s my code: <p id="storyTitle"><%= storyTitle %></p> <script type="text/javascript"> new Ajax.InPlaceEditor(''storyTitle'', ''editBlog.jsp'', { callback: function(value) { return ''v=edit&user=<%=

On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 15:51 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > - There is no support for generating position-independent code on > > > PPC32. (PIC on PPC64 now works well). Nevertheless, I have > > > sometimes run into linking errors when compiling shared libraries > > > with C++ on PPC64. PPC64 is PIC by nature. As for the linking issue, possibly you blew the

On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:55:13 -0500 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:46:02 -0500 > Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > > On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:19:13 -0500 > > Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 20:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > > Thanks! Do you

Peter, Thanks! Do you happen to know where this needs to be changed in clang or LLVM. The code that actually interprets the constraints, generically, is in CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp, is clang relying on that code, or is there some frontend code in clang itself that is failing to initially interpret the string? If it is the code in TargetLowering, then I don't see any support

While the MCJIT doesn't cover all of the features the old JIT had, it has the huge advantage of actually producing working results on ARM and PPC64. The old JIT for non-x86 has bit-rotted a lot, to the point of crashing even for simple examples. I'm proposing to remove the JIT code emitters for the ARM and PPC targets now so it's no longer holding back the development of the MC parts

On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:19:13 -0500 Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 20:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > Thanks! Do you happen to know where this needs to be changed in > > clang or LLVM. The code that actually interprets the constraints, > > generically, is in CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp, is clang > > relying on

Hi, Is it possible to run Wine over vxWorks OS \PPC architecture ?? If not - Does anyone know about Windows emulator for this atchitecture. Thanks.

On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:46:02 -0500 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:19:13 -0500 > Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 20:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > Thanks! Do you happen to know where this needs to be changed in > > > clang or LLVM. The code that actually interprets the

Hi Chris, Chris Lattner wrote: > Sorry for the delay, > > No problem. Plus the reviewing may have taken some time. So thx a lot for committing. I talked to Jim who said he wanted to commit his changes before mine -- I hope everything's Ok. > I applied the patches after some cleanups. Please keep code within 80 > columns, please don't use nested ?: expressions without

Thanks for your information. So, do you think it's better working with MCJIT instead of JIT specially for ARM platforms? I'm going to work on .bc files of some benchmarks for ARM platform. And, I decided to work with the JIT. Now, you proposed working with MCJIT. Could I get all the benefits of JIT in MCJIT as well? Regards Negar On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Benjamin Kramer

On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Alright, thx Evan, that's what I did. > > Here are the final patches I think can be committed. I tried to separate > them into independent chunks, but I'm not sure how to do this in a good > way because of CVS and since everything is kind of related. Sorry for the delay, I applied the patches after some cleanups. Please