similar to: OT: Need some riser card advice...

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "OT: Need some riser card advice..."

2014 Sep 16
2
OT: hardware question
Hi, folks, I'm installing a RAID controller card for a large external RAID box in a Dell server. I've got two riser slots available. Here's the question: the controller card has some large chips on one side, and if I put it in riser 1, those chips face downwards in the box, blocking ease of cooling, while if I put it in riser 2, the chips will face up... but be right over a large
2009 Mar 06
2
compatibility dell]
The systems will be operating the Center 5.2 32-bit, below the model, one will doubt that the system of controlling the media to do a RAID 0+1 PowerEdge SC1435 Processor AMD Opteron ? 2344HE Quad Core (1.7 GHz, 4x512 KB L2 cache, 1 GHz HyperTransport) - BRH8835 edit Memory 8GB Memory, 667MHz (4x2GB), Single Ranked Primary controller Integrated SATA Controller - No RAID edit First Hard Drive SAS
2009 Mar 16
3
A400P + Intel D201GLY2(A) motherboard?
Hello I'd like to build myself an Asterisk server for SOHO use. Intel's D201GLY2 motherboard (http://tinyurl.com/ddarzp) looks like a very good deal, but I'm concerned about two things: 1. Will an A400P (from OpenVox, but supposed to be Digium-compatible http://tinyurl.com/ck6nfu) fit with a PCI riser, or will the CPU heatsink/fan be in the way? I downloaded the PDF from
2011 Jul 13
2
TDM400p susceptible to EMI?
I have a TDM400p with 3 fxs and 1 fxo daughter cards. It's in a mini-itx case with a 'right-angle' PCI riser card so the TDM400p is 'sandwiched' between the Atom D525 CPU and the 2.5" hard drive. I'm getting a bunch of clicks and pops on all ports. Has anybody had a similar experience? Did you find a solution? -- Thanks in advance,
2003 Jul 21
4
Via EPIA Mini-ITX motherboard
Just to drag this thread on a bit further ... I've been looking into these little boxes, thinking I could use one as a firewall/gateway. My one requirement is that it would need to have two PCI slots (one can be low-profile), and although I've seen PCI riser cards that can give me two slots, they've been rare, and cases that are suitable (i.e have the space, and back panels are
2005 May 12
0
Re: Hardware RAID Controller -- Risers and 66+MHz ...
From: Lee W <centos-list at unassemble.co.uk> > Shouldn't be a problem as it's probably going in a 1U Rack case > with a Riser/extender card. Be sure to hit the 3Ware site to read about _incompatible_ risers! At 66+MHz PCI/PCI-X signaling, many cards/risers have issues. Many are only designed for 33MHz. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org
2009 Apr 23
3
Compact, fanless appliance?
Hello For those SOHO customers (ie. at most, a couple of POTS/ISDN connections and simultaneous SIP calls) who'd rather not use a big, noisy PC to run Asterisk, I'd like to offer an alternative that has the following features: - not old hardware sold on eBay, ie. it must be up-to-date hardware sold by a company currently in business - compact, silent - has room for a 2.5" hard-disk,
2007 Apr 15
1
Hardware
Hi, I'm looking for IBM hardware to support: 100 SIP hard phone users 10 fax machines on SIP ata's maybe later an additional 100 sip soft phones. Initially, all calls will be through PRI. Some conferencing. Don't know yet if this will even get used. Using 1.4 + ( probably business edition ) I'm looking for anyone who some experience / gotchas. I've google'd and
2013 Aug 21
1
Slightly OT: PCIe x16 card in x8 slot
So, in the ongoing saga of the unusual 1U short-depth workstation, we have narrowed the field to two choices. Both entrants are configured with 16GB memory (4x4GB), two 2.5" drives (1x250GB SSD and 1x1TB HDD), and an NVIDIA NVS510 graphic card (quad display): 1) SuperMicro 5017R-MF, Xeon E5-2609 processor 2) SuperMicro 5017C-LF, Xeon E3-1220 processor (I wish SuperMicro had a list of their
2007 Jul 31
1
Problems using TE412P and TDM400B in a IBM x3650
Another day, another apparant unexplained hardware incompatibility. I have a TE412P and a TDM400B living quite happily in a whitebox using an Intel motherboard: http://www.intel.com/design/servers/boards/se7230nh1-e/index.htm I tried to move to an IBM x3650 system. It uses a slightly newer chipset, but apparantly it's in the same family. The SE-7230 board has been EOL'd and the
2009 Jan 29
6
getting Centos on "used" rackable systems 1U with dual Opteron 248 HE
hi there. anyone have any tips on params to pass to the kernel etc in order to install Centos4 or Centos5 32bit or 64 bit installed on this unit i can get it close to install, yet no cigar. it is a tyan MB and ill try to get more info if needed... for this case, please assume for now that the hardware itself is not "bad" thanks in advance... - rh Rackable Systems Dual Opteron 2.0
2013 Apr 30
3
flashing a BIOS on an HP server
Hi, folks, Since I've gotten a total of one response in days on the HP forum, maybe the collective mind here has an answer.... As I've mentioned in other posts, we have an HP dl580 g5 that started throwing ECC errors. But wait, it's worse: memory is mirrored.... And the thing is fully populated with 32 DIMMs. I took my best guess, pulled the matching set of DIMMs, and took two
2010 Mar 08
0
Clearance issues
I''m really trying to use bundler, but I seem to be running into way more problems then it seems worth. Now, this issue I''m having might not be related directly to bundler, but I can''t figure out what else could be causing it. My Gemfile source :gemcutter gem "rails", "~> 2.3.5", :require => nil gem "clearance", "0.8.6" My
2006 Oct 02
4
PCI unable to handle 64bit address space for
Hello all this is my first post to this list so i would like to than you all in advance for your time and consideration. I am in the process of building a new server and have purchased some used hardware. There seems to be some hardware issuses and i am hoping nothing was damaged during shipping. However i am in contact with intel and we are tring to figure out the exact problem via email. So
2013 Apr 24
3
DIMM problem
Hey, folks, I've got an HP Proliant DL580 G5 throwing ECC errors. This is annoying, since a) it's all new as of a few months ago, and b) it's *fully* populated. The two things I need to figure out are a) *which* DIMM it is, and b) is it mirrored; if so, which *other* DIMM needs to come out until we get replacements from the OEM. Here's one of many, all identical, from dmesg:
2006 Feb 20
3
Dell PowerEdge 2850
Hello, Digium uses the Dell PE 2850 for their testing. This site says that 3.3V PCI slot. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+hardware We are planning on purchasing a Dell PE 2850 and putting a TE205P card on it. However, the needs a 5V PCI slot. Does Dell PE 2850 has a 5V PCI slot? A person in our group tried to call Dell's customer support but they do not seem to know.
2005 Jan 25
6
TDM400P Dell 1850 Server
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 49 bytes Desc: bullet.gif Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050125/1dbc7ddf/attachment.gif
2010 Oct 27
0
Help with routes
Switching our routes file from Rails2 to Rails3 DSl uncovered an odd situation, of my own making, but I am having some difficultly imagining how to fix it. Basically I have a commonplace: user -> user_role (clearance) <- role type arrangement where: User has_many :roles, :through => :clearances has_many :clearances Clearance belongs_to :role belongs_to :user and Role
2010 Jan 21
2
nested forms and attr_accessable
Rails 2.3.5 I am working on a nested form that assigns roles to users through a table called clearances. I have attr_acessable turned off globally in an initializer: ActiveRecord::Base.send(:attr_accessible, nil) I have this set in clearance.rb attr_accessible(:description, :effective_from, :role_id, :superceded_after, :user_id) And this is what params looks like after the
2013 Mar 25
2
[LLVMdev] About the partial update clearence / dependency breaking mechanism
Hello, I am currently looking into the advantages of using the partial update clearance / dependency breaking mechanism for some ARM cores. It seems that the ARM specific code for this will always return a clearance of 0 for VLD1LNd32 because of the following code in getPartialRegUpdateClearance: > if (UseOp != -1 && MI->getOperand(UseOp).readsReg()) > return 0; so