similar to: Apache, SELinux, and document root on a different partition

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "Apache, SELinux, and document root on a different partition"

2012 Jan 05
6
SELinux and access across 'similar types'
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux says: "Access is only allowed between similar types, so Apache running as httpd_t can read /var/www/html/index.html of type httpd_sys_content_t." however the doc doesn't define what "similar types" means. I assumed it just meant "beginning with the same prefix". However that can't be right because on my system with
2017 Feb 21
2
SELInux conflict with Postfixadmin
On 02/21/2017 11:46 AM, Zdenek Sedlak wrote: > On 2017-02-21 17:30, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> postfixadmin setup.php is claiming: >> >> *Error: Smarty template compile directory templates_c is not writable.* >> *Please make it writable.* >> *If you are using SELinux or AppArmor, you might need to adjust their >> setup to allow write access.* >>
2015 Apr 01
1
SEmodule dependency hell.
I want you all to see what I went through trying to simply reassign (unsuccessfully) the context of a well-known port. To the best of my ability to recall none of the packages mentioned below are even installed on the host in question. Why are these dependices preventing me from removing a disused SELinux policy. I have done exactly that, reassign port contexts, in the past without encountering
2017 Feb 21
3
SELInux conflict with Postfixadmin
postfixadmin setup.php is claiming: *Error: Smarty template compile directory templates_c is not writable.* *Please make it writable.* *If you are using SELinux or AppArmor, you might need to adjust their setup to allow write access.* This goes away with 'setenforce 0', so it is an SELinux issue. I have tried both: restorecon -Rv /usr/share/postfixadmin and chcon -R -t
2019 Jan 30
2
SELinux policy vs. static web content
Hi, Some time ago I wrote an introductory article about SELinux on my blog. I'm currently updating it for my new blog, and I found a curious change in SELinux policy. Here goes. For demonstration purposes, I'm using some static webpages, more exactly the default pages found in /usr/share/httpd/noindex, which I simply copied over to /var/www/html. As a first practical example, I'm
2017 Sep 04
5
selinux denial of cgi script with httpd using ssl
Thanks for your help. I did pick up an additional entry in the audit file : type=AVC msg=audit(1504561395.709:10196): avc: denied { execute } for pid=19163 comm="/usr/sbin/httpd" name="s.check.cgi" dev="dm-0" ino=537182029 scontext=system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 tclass=file Unfortunately, I am not sure how the
2001 Oct 08
0
fsck confused about auto in fstab
For some odd reason, fsck has suddenly become confused about what "auto" means after I changed the root to ext3 and everything in fstab to auto. This is happening on a Redhat Pentium III box running 2.4.9 and I also installed just recently util-linux 2.11l and glibc 2.2.4. fsck is 1.2.5 as indicated below. fsck 1.25 (20-Sep-2001) Checking all file systems. Could not determine
2006 Sep 02
1
imap fails, policy wrong?
up until a week or so ago, I had no problem using IMAP logging into a server running Fedora Core (I think 4 or 5 ) with dovecot 1.0. Had used squirrelmail and other mail agents using IMAP with no problem. as of 2 days ago, I get a squirrelmail error "ERROR: Connection dropped by IMAP server. Query: CAPABILITY" and turning on dovecot debugging shows the following:
2008 Aug 01
2
BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.2 triggers SE Linux denial
Hi. I've installed BackupPC 3.1.0 from Testing repository, to Cent OS 5.2 x86_64, and I am hitting an SE Linux denial - the httpd cannot talk to the BackupPC socket: type=AVC msg=audit(07/31/2008 17:18:53.623:410) : avc: denied { connectto } for pid=11767 comm=httpd path=/var/log/BackupPC/BackupPC.sock scontext=user_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=user_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0
2009 Sep 09
1
SELinux Relabeling
Hello everyone, If create a folder called "whatever" under /var, the context is: root:object_r:var_t /var/whatever/ That's expected as it is under /var. If I then change its type: chcont -t httpd_sys_content_t /var/whatever The context looks like: root:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t /var/whatever/ My question is...Shouldn't a relabeling of the filesystem change the type
2007 Dec 17
2
Digest Subcriber needs help with SELinux file context setting
CentOS-5.1 I need some help with setting up the SELinux context for a custom httpd directory so that I can write log files into it. This is what I have: In my virtual host config file: RewriteEngine on RewriteLog /etc/httpd/virtual.d/trac-rewrite.log # RewriteLogLevel 0=off 1=basic 2=verbose 3+=module developer debuging RewriteLogLevel 0 If /etc/httpd/virtual.d/trac-rewrite.log does
2007 Mar 12
2
selinux disable but still working
I have some centos 4.4 server. i have disable selinux for some software problem: # cat /etc/selinux/config # This file controls the state of SELinux on the system. # SELINUX= can take one of these three values: # enforcing - SELinux security policy is enforced. # permissive - SELinux prints warnings instead of enforcing. # disabled - SELinux is fully disabled. SELINUX=disable #
2017 Sep 22
2
selinux prevents lighttpd from printing
PS: Now I found this: type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(09/22/2017 12:08:29.911:1023) : proctitle=/usr/lib/sendmail -t -oi -oem -fwawi-genimp type=SYSCALL msg=audit(09/22/2017 12:08:29.911:1023) : arch=x86_64 syscall=setgroups success=no exit=EPERM(Operation not permitted) a0=0x1 a1=0x7ffc1df3b0d0 a2=0x0 a3=0x7f5d77c3a300 items=0 ppid=19417 pid=19418 auid=unset uid=lighttpd gid=lighttpd euid=root
2011 Jan 14
1
httpd and selinux
Hello, Running httpd-2.2.3-43.el5.centos.3 on CentOS release 5.5 (Final), I have : $ ps -Ze LABEL PID TTY TIME CMD user_u:system_r:httpd_t 12833 ? 00:00:00 httpd Is it normal for httpd to have this context (user_u:system_r:httpd_t) ? I was expecting system_u:system_r:httpd_t. And if it is not normal, is it because I have restarted httpd by
2006 Oct 09
2
Directories not writable (Apache/PHP)
Hi, I have a new CentOS sever install. I've also installed suPHP to replicate a live server. When I upload file via FTP the permissions seem OK, however the directories copied are not writable?? Any ideas? I have tried chmod 777 and that's not working either. Could is be a suPHP issue? I have 'suPHP_UserGroup GROUP USER' setup in my virtual directory and the user is also in the
2020 Jan 01
2
Nginx and SELinux on CentOS 7
Hi, I'm currently fiddling with Nginx on CentOS 7. Eventually I want to use it instead of Apache on some servers. Apache works more or less out of the box with SELinux. My websites are all stored under /var/www, and ls -Z shows me that all files created under /var/www are correctly labeled httpd_sys_content_t. On my sandbox server I don't have Apache (httpd) installed, only Nginx
2015 Jan 22
2
SELinux permissions for apache
Hey all, I have a simple php app working that writes some info to a text file. The app will only work correctly if SELinux is disabled. If it's enabled and try to use the app, it fails. It seems that SELinux is denying the app ability to write to the text file. So I tried running the following command: chcon -R -t httpd_sys_content_t /var/www And tried veriying the command with the
2017 Sep 22
1
selinux prevents lighttpd from printing
Daniel Walsh wrote: > On 09/22/2017 06:58 AM, hw wrote: >> >> PS: Now I found this: >> >> >> type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(09/22/2017 12:08:29.911:1023) : proctitle=/usr/lib/sendmail -t -oi -oem -fwawi-genimp >> type=SYSCALL msg=audit(09/22/2017 12:08:29.911:1023) : arch=x86_64 syscall=setgroups success=no exit=EPERM(Operation not permitted) a0=0x1
2015 Jan 22
2
SELinux permissions for apache
Hey Jeremy, > Have you tried changing the folder where it's writing into with these > lables? httpd_sys_content_rw_t or httpd_user_content_rw_t Adding 'rw' to the command did the trick. I tried httpd_sys_content_rw_t and that works fine! Thanks for the tip! Tim On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jeremy Hoel <jthoel at gmail.com> wrote: > Have you tried changing
2007 Dec 07
0
mounting nfs as httpd_sys_content_t under selinux
I have a NFS mount that I want apache to be able to serve files from. According to this doc: http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/5.1/Deployment_Guide/rhlcommon-section-0097.html I should be able to mount it with a context that will allow apache to access it. But when I try the command they suggest: [root at vm-37:~] mount -t nfs -o \ context=system_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t \