similar to: Please Update Extras Repo?!

Hi, I've upgrade the kernel to the latest version (C5) and after the update the drbd is not being loaded at reboot time. My previous running kernel was 2.6.18-164.el5. I've checked the /lib/modules/ and /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.10.1.el5/weak-updates/drbd82/drbd.ko -> /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5/extra/drbd82/drbd.ko And /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5/extra/drbd82/drbd.ko exists 2004

Since December there have been several kernel updates to the centosplus repository for centos4... but no updates to kmod-xfs or kmod-drbd82. Latest kernel is 2.6.9-78.0.13.plus.c4, but latest kmod-xfs is 2.6.9_78.0.5.plus.c4. Latest drbd82 kmod is also for 78.0.5. I know there was a mention on the list that these modules are not kernel dependent anymore... but yum and rpm seem to indicate

PowerDNS supports CAA records beginning with version 4.0, but the pdns package in EPEL for most recent centos versions is stuck at around version 3.4 (3.4.11 is what I have). Do I have no other choice but to manually compile and maintain my own pdns installation? I prefer to avoid this but I need up-to-date features. Perhaps there is a PowerDNS specific work-around? Maybe the EPEL

Hi, I have two servers in a drbd primary/secondary setup. Everything was fine until I had to reboot both servers. The primary rebooted first, the secondary assumed fine, but when the (old primary) server got back online it was unable to mount the drbd fs complaining about the modules. I've tried to find out the problem but the servers seem to have the same setup rpm -qa | grep drbd

Does anyone have experience with PDNS? The reason I ask is that I have never heard of it before today, but it looks like we might want to leverage its sql backend capabilites. My (useless) searches lead me to: * http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-es/2009-February/004499.html * http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-July/078975.html (in spanish...) *

Hi, I am trying to compile an application (PowerDNS) with PostgreSQL support. Where do the PowerDNS libraries get installed under CentOS? I am constantly getting the error checking for PgSQL library directory... configure: error: Didn't find the pgsql library dir in '/usr/include/lib/pgsql /usr/include/pgsql /usr/include' -- "I never look back darling, it distracts from the

We're trying to setup a dual-primary DRBD environment, with a shared disk with either OCFS2 or GFS. The environment is a Centos 5.3 with DRBD82 (but also tried with DRBD83 from testing) . Setting up a single primary disk and running bonnie++ on it works. Setting up a dual-primary disk, only mounting it on one node (ext3) and running bonnie++ works When setting up ocfs2 on the /dev/drbd0

We're trying to setup a dual-primary DRBD environment, with a shared disk with either OCFS2 or GFS. The environment is a Centos 5.3 with DRBD82 (but also tried with DRBD83 from testing) . Setting up a single primary disk and running bonnie++ on it works. Setting up a dual-primary disk, only mounting it on one node (ext3) and running bonnie++ works When setting up ocfs2 on the /dev/drbd0

Hi, it seems this module is missing from the extras repo? kernel-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5.x86_64.rpm 06-Aug-2008 08:30 and one day later kmod-drbd82-8.2.6-1.2.6.18_92.1.10.el5.x86_64.rpm 07-Aug-2008 22:54 kernel-2.6.18-92.1.13.el5.x86_64.rpm 25-Sep-2008 16:40 and ... Any problems with it? Thx Rainer

Hello, This morning I noticed the following output from "yum update": Installing: drbd82 x86_64 8.2.5-1.el5.centos extras 209 k replacing drbd.x86_64 8.0.11-1.el5.centos As far as I'm aware DRBD works fine for me. Is there a way I can find out about the new release and weather I should upgrade? I can't figure out the CentOS issue tracking system

Hi, After searching the archive I found one post (last october) complaining about lack of kmod-drbd2 rpm for the lastest kernels. Almost two months have passed and no sign of the rpm I was wondering if the mantainer has some news about it. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I have a server with Centos 5 + DRBD installed and is working fine, but when i run yum for udpate system show this error: Transaction Check Error: file /etc/drbd.conf conflicts between attempted installs of drbd-8.0.12-1.el5.centos and drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos file /etc/rc.d/init.d/drbd conflicts between attempted installs of drbd-8.0.12-1.el5.centos and drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos file

Hello everybody, I just wanted to upgrade my system and stepped over the following error: --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: pdns-3.4.7-1.el7.x86_64 (@epel) Requires: libmbedtls.so.9()(64bit) Removing: mbedtls-1.3.14-1.el7.x86_64 (@epel) libmbedtls.so.9()(64bit) Updated By: mbedtls-2.2.1-1.el7.x86_64 (epel)

Hi, I just tried to build using http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/SRPMS/pdns-3.1-2.el6.src.rpm on CentOS 6.4 final (kernel: 2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64), but it failed when looking for ldap libs: Note: I did not change anything in the original spec file. ... + ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu

Hi everyone, How does one go about putting a request for getting a package included in centosplus? We are heavy users the product PowerDNS and are keen to see that be included in the centosplus repository, so it can be compiled against other recent packages like MySQL5 etc. Any pointers will be helpful -- "I never look back darling, it distracts from the now", Edna Mode (The

I can't find the kernel-2.6.9-78.0.1.EL.src.rpm and kernel-2.6.9-78.0.1.plus.c4.src.rpm on the download sites - the binary i386/x86_64 RPMS are there, but not the matching SRPMs Does anyone know where they are? Thanks James Pearson

Ralph Angenendt, Fabian Arrotin, Akemi Yagi and I have been working on new DRBD packages for CentOS Extras. We have some packages that have been tested in the testing repository. LinBit has discontinued their 8.2 tree, so drbd83 will replace drbd82 in both CentOS 4 and CentOS 5 extras. DRBD 0.7.25 will remain in CentOS 4, however it gets no upstream support and I would recommend you upgrade to

I am attempting to implement XFS on a new system. System: Supermicro SC846 TQ-R900B - rack-mountable SUPERMICRO X7DWN+ - motherboard 3ware 9650SE-24M8 - storage controller 10 Hitachi DeskStar 7K1000 - hard drive - 1 TB 8GB Ram 2 Intel Quad-Core Xeon E5420 / 2.5 GHz processor Installed Centos 5.1 X86 64 from DVD. System on /dev/sda1 ? 250GB ext3 (raid 5). /home will be on /dev/sdb1 ? over 7TB

Hi Christof! AFAIK, PowerDNS is the only open source name server that supports ALIAS. There was an idea to standardize ALIAS as "ANAME" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-aname/), but the idea was dropped in favor of SVCB/HTTPS record https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9460/. So now we have to wait until all Browser vendors implement SVCB/HTTPS. Regards Klaus PS: If

While SVCB/HTTPS provides a better solution for the browsing use case, I see other use cases where ALIAS/ANAME would be ideal, notably in apex RRs. So while fostering SVCB/HTTPS deployment is a good thing, I wouldn?t mind name server software implementing ALIAS. Including NSD, but I reckon it?s much more challenging to do due to NSD architecture than it was to implement it in PowerDNS. But if