similar to: vsftpd

I had a test machine up and running Samba, joining an AD domain, and set up with winbind... when I ran "getent passwd" it would list all the local users, and all the domain users. I could also log in as a domain user without any problem. So, I made an image of the hard drive, and copied it to 7 other machines. Now, those 7 are having a strange problem. I changed the names and IP's of

Am running Centos5.2 64Bit, want to run windows application on it [x at linux10 ~]$ uname -a Linux 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5 #1 SMP Wed Sep 24 19:32:05 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [x at linux10 ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.2 (Final) Which Wine version should i install? Should i go for rpm or tarball package? Which packages should be installed beside Wine? Thanks -- THE

Hi list, I've a problem with vsftpd on C7.3. This is a dedicated server protected by a Zywall5. SELINUX is disabled. This is my vsftpd configuration: anonymous_enable=NO local_enable=YES write_enable=YES local_umask=022 dirmessage_enable=YES xferlog_enable=YES connect_from_port_20=YES xferlog_file=/var/log/vsftpd.log xferlog_std_format=YES idle_session_timeout=600

I thought I had read a response to this. Went something like this: Word (and lots of others such apps) do not actually deal with the original file. They create a temporary file which overwrites the original when you save the new document. The 'new' file of course inherits the new editor's ownership. Hope this helps you. Noel -----Original Message----- From: Josh Konkol

Hi Folks. I'm trying to setup Samba and having a bit of a problem... However, I'm not sure if it's a Samba issue, or NFS issue. The setup is as follows: Server 1 --> exports /storage/ftpusers In that folder, there are numerous user folders that are owned by each specific user. Server 2 --> nfs mounts server1:/storage/ftpusers as /mnt/ftpusers At the

Is this simply impossible? No one's replied, or suggested another alternative... Am I asking on the wrong list perhaps? -- A -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Samba] Help with permissions Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:47:24 -0600 From: Ashley M. Kirchner <ashley@pcraft.com> To: samba@lists.samba.org Hi Folks. I'm trying to setup Samba and having a bit of a

doveconf -n: # 2.2.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-042stab116.1 x86_64 Debian 8.6 mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { special_use = \Sent }

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1284 Michael Felt <aixtools at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aixtools at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Michael Felt <aixtools at gmail.com> --- Just thought it could be

Hi folks, After some more trial and error, I was able to get a bit further in the game with the permission issues I had (previous message was titled 'Samba permissions...) Now I'm able to get onto the system, browse and read/copy/delete files off of the shares. What I can't do is put stuff on because I get a locking error. The setup is as follows: Server 1 -->

Hi all, first i want to say a big "Hello" to the list, since this is my first posting here. Yesterday i just installed another SAMBA server on a middle class (K6-2 500, 128MB) machine. All shares are accessable like expected but i often get an "Can't move file. File in use." error from my W2K client when moving large amount of files to the SAMBA server. This error

At the risk of stating the obvious but 2.2.3a is rather old - try updating to the latest stable 2.2.x series of Samba. After that you might want to look into the options relating to "Oplocks" >>I am wondering if anybody has expected the same problem before? The only idea i have is that this error occures because i have a lot of file and directory, chown, chmod directives in my

Thanks to everyone who has replied to my emails so far - to summarise: AIX allows setting of rlogin=false and and a su group, or a list of users that are permitted to "su" to root. ( or other functional ids ) This means with entries in /etc/ftpusers, it is possible to : 1/ Track who used root via sulog and or external logging 2/ Protect root even if the root password is compromised 3/

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.61 Severity: wishlist File: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/proftpd Two weeks ago, I got a rush of these: Sep 8 12:37:07 goretex proftpd: PAM-listfile: Refused user news for service proftpd (Apparently, fail2ban managed to miss those.) This is triggered by pam_listfile, which is used by proftpd (and other FTP daemons) to block users listed in

I have 1 Centos server V4.x already running VSFTPD and when the user logs in they get chrooted to the home directory, I have installed the same config files to a second server (again Centos V4.x) and have setup the same user on the second server but the user does not get chrooted to the home directory but is placed in /var/ftp/pub and cannot upload file. The files I copied are:-

Hi folks, I can't seem to log into my system via vsftpd. All other services using PAM are fine...Am I missing something simple? ftp> user (username) user 331 Please specify the password. Password: 530 Login incorrect. # getenforce Permissive here is the event in /var/log/audit/audit.log: type=USER_AUTH msg=audit(1247235151.569:9781): user pid=21052 uid=0 auid=0

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 16:09, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> wrote: > I updated to CentOS 7.6 and something must have changed in the base OS > setup that prevents vsftpd from allowing logins for accounts with > /sbin/nologin as their shell. I had to add that to /etc/shells so that > such > accounts could FTP again. That file is in the setup package. Did it >

Hello everyone, I have been given the task of working out a number of issues with OpenSSH for my company (Hertz). I have been following the mailing list for several days now and I'm beginning to compile a list of who is working on what. To make my task faster, it would nice if the people working on the following issues would drop me a email before I start to rewrite their code and get it

We have a problem with file security settings changing when a file is edited by someone who is not the owner. When the edited file is saved, ownership is transferred to the person who edited the file. Also, access control settings for the file are reset to a default setting. This is a real problem, since in some cases it means that the original owner of the file no longer has permission to edit

We use samba 2.2.9 with winbind. We use winbind for authentication. I was able to selectively limit pop3 use among winbind users on redhat 9 with this pam configuration. (As you would use it in ftpusers, in the reverse sense.) auth required /lib/security/pam_listfile.so item=user onerr=fail sense=allow file=/etc/pop3users This is the best solution for my situation, and I want to have that on my

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1284 --- Comment #2 from Michael Felt <aixtools at gmail.com> --- p.s. re: sftp ignoring /etc/ftpusers. Question: is this by design? If not, is this something unexpected for all systems? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.