similar to: Discussion: automount problem in 5.2

Hello, I am using Cent OS 5.2 . i want to create one master image of whole running OS becoz i have to do same installation many times on different machines. so any one suggest me to how create and run the image of whole OS at the time of installation or , which escape me to install each and every thing many times. i would not like to create image using dd. any suggestions ?? - - Thanks and

HI all, i am configuring VNC server in CentOS 5.1. i have enables this two lines in /etc/sysconfig/vncserver file VNCSERVERS="2:vnc" VNCSERVERARGS[2]="-geometry 1024x768 -depth 24" here i have created a user vnc and set the password using vncpasswd cmd. then i started the vncserver # vncserver New 'localhost.localdomain:1 (gopinath)' desktop is

Hello All, I would like to know that like other communities why not our Cent OS Community is on Nabble. I think it is better for us if we will be there on. -- Thanks and Regards, Kapil Singh Kushwah Linux System/Network Administrator Hotwax Media Inc. Indore,(M.P) INDIA -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have never been able to get cups to work properly since CentOS 4.x (and am now on 5.2). When I try to "service start cups", cupsd immediately starts taking 100% of the cpu. Attaching strace to it shows no system calls happening. I have tried uninstalling and reinstalling cups to get fresh config files. My printers.conf is empty. This is on a completely updated x86_64 CentOS 5.2

Hi, I recently made a CentOS install on a machine with an unsupported network card. I had to add the driver for it later, once I finished the install. For now I have this: [kikinovak at localhost ~]$ hostname --fqdn localhost.localdomain Q: how would I change this to something like calimero.local? Here's what I *would* do, but I prefer to ask before. 1) edit /etc/sysconfig/network and

Hello Akemi & Others, Today I reformated my laptop Dell Precision M90 and installed the Fresh version of CentOs 5.2 and then took all the available update. In that update I got Kernel version update and now I am on Kernel-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5.centos.plus. I kept a file iwlwifi-3945-1.ucode into the /lib/firmware/ Now after restarting the computer my computer it is giving the following message

Hi Devang, GlobalModRefPass is also a ModulePass and it uses CallGraph Analysis. So, I think it should not necessary to extend CallGraphSCCPass to use CallGraph information. Module Pass shoule be sufficient... --Kapil On 10/8/08, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Kapil, > > On Oct 8, 2008, at 10:19 AM, kapil anand wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I

On Oct 8, 2008, at 10:59 AM, kapil anand wrote: > Hi Devang, > > GlobalModRefPass is also a ModulePass and it uses CallGraph Analysis. > So, I think it should not necessary to extend CallGraphSCCPass to use > CallGraph information. Module Pass shoule be sufficient... ok, but you're Registering your pass in CallGraph Analysis group. What if you remove

> On 30 Nov 2014, at 17:51, Abhishek Singh Kushwah <abhishek18kushwah at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Two of the implementation of algorithms has already been rejected > > previously due to licenses both being the implementation of porter > > but our xapian use implementation in snowball which i assume is > > under GPL. The only cases I can think you might be

Hi Kapil! LLVM both builds and runs fine on ARM Linux. I am running a public buildbot for the llvm project that are compiling and testing llvm on arm-linux daily and this machine are running Ubuntu Jaunty. http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-arm-linux I have successfully compiled LLVM on ARM using GCC 4.3.3 on a Ubuntu Jaunty system and GCC 4.4 on a Ubuntu Karmic system. Do you use

My god! I would love a branch predictor! It would simplify many aspects of my register allocator. Second, I am surprised it did not make it into the tree. Since more is being done with register allocation as a while "RegAllocBasic" was just put in, I hope this is looked at again. Do you have a working svn copy? Also, could you send me a copy/link to that '94 paper off the list

Thanks Andrei! I haven't read the paper. I would see whether this fulfills my requirements or whether I need to make any changes. --Kapil On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Andrei Alvares <logytech at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Kapil, > > I have implemented a static profiler for LLVM as a google summer of > code project in 2009. I wrote it for the 2.4 branch, but the >

Hi Kapil, On Oct 8, 2008, at 10:19 AM, kapil anand wrote: > Hi all, > > I need a new kind of analysis on LLVM Module, so I made a new pass > to do this. This new pass extends the ModulePass class and follows > the conventions used in GlobalModRefPass, which is also a Module > Pass.I need the CallGraph analysis for this pass, hence I have added >

The Compilation error I am getting: "Error while compiling ARMJITInfo.cpp.. Selected processor does not support fstmfdd sp!,{d0,d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7}.... On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:45 PM, kapil anand <kapilanand2 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have an ARM virtual machine with ubuntu and want to port LLVM over that. > In release documents, ARM is not in the list of

Hello Kapil, I have implemented a static profiler for LLVM as a google summer of code project in 2009. I wrote it for the 2.4 branch, but the implementation never made into the tree. I have recently ported it to LLVM 2.8, but I haven't tested it. You can take a look at the code from: http://homepages.dcc.ufmg.br/~rimsa/tools/stprof-llvm.patch The implementation is based on Wu's

Hello Jeff, On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Jeff Kunkel <jdkunk3 at gmail.com> wrote: > My god! I would love a branch predictor! It would simplify many aspects of > my register allocator. The branch predictor of the implementation is not as accurate as the one from the paper, but it is close enough. Unfortunately, the branch predictor is a very expensive pass, because it relies on

You said it was expensive, but if you had to put a big-o estimate on it, what would it be? -Thanks Jeff Kunkel On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Andrei Alvares <logytech at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Jeff, > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Jeff Kunkel <jdkunk3 at gmail.com> wrote: > > My god! I would love a branch predictor! It would simplify many aspects > of >

HI Devang, Initially I had not added this pass to the group and I got this error regarding PassManager. I added the pass to group just to check whether that removes the error or not... I have removed it again. Is there any other registration required to configure pass manager for the pass? --Kapil On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > > On

Media instructions like - parallel add and subtract, Sign/Zero Extend and Add instructions seem to be missing from ARM target support. These instructions are not listed in GenInstrNames.inc Kapil On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > > Can you give some examples of missing instructions? > > Evan > > On Oct 9, 2008, at 4:58 PM,

Hi Jeff, There is an algorithm to build the dominator tree that is O(n2), where n is the number of nodes on the control flow graph. I believe exists another that is linear, but I don't which one of them is implemented in LLVM. The problem is that the branch predictor requires post dominance information. None of the LLVM basic passes require post dominance information (AFAIK), hence it is