similar to: Software Raid Expert Needed

Hi All I've just shifteed over to linux,form Windows.I 'm having 5 partations for use by my windows XP Professional and another one by linux.The partation table is as shown : ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [root at localhost6 ~]# fdisk -l Disk /dev/hdc: 250.0 GB, 250059350016

I posted this to the Fedora-list, but thought I might get some additional information here as well. I have a HD that refuses to mount with a 'bad magic number in super-block'. I'm running FedoraCore 6 x86_64. [root at moe ~]# fdisk -l /dev/hdc Disk /dev/hdc: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Hello all, I have a machine with 2 SATA 250GB disks which I want to upgrade to 1TB SATAs This is the partition structure on both disks: Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 25 200781 fd

Hi, how can i passthroughs HDD with sda instead of xvda ? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi Johannes, This is very helpful and thank you for the quick response. I imagine that the usual nested loop structure is something like: loop1_header_bb bbs_between_loop1_header_and_loop2_header loop2_header_bb loop_body_bbs br loop2_header_bb instructions_before_loop1_end_and_after_loop2_end br loop1_header_bb In this case you mean that loop2_header_bb might need to be split before

Hello everyone, Quick question about loop extraction in llvm. I've been using the LoopExtractor pass in llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/LoopExtractor.cpp to extract top level loops from programs. I'm wondering if extracting inner-most loops is any more complex than using the BlockExtractor pass in llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/BlockExtractor.cpp and making sure that the basic blocks in the extracted

Hello, I had a scientific linux 3.0.4 system (rhel compatible), with 3 ide disks, one for / and two others in linear raid (250 gb and 300 gb each). This system was obsoleted so i move the raid disks to a new scientific linux 3.0.7 installation. However, the raid array was not detected ( I put the disks on the same channels and same master/lsave setup as in the previous setup). In fact

Hello! I installed NexentaOS (Opensolaris kernel b104+). First booting system is true. Before first rebooting system updates boot_archive. It''s false. Computer is freeze and CapsLock and ScrollLock is blinking. Helps only RESET button. My system is Ubuntu 8.10, kernel-2.6.30-rc3-tip, Xen-3.4-Stable with debug options enabled. My hardware: AMD Athlon64X2 5400+, RAM 4GB. For DomU: mem=1024,

Hello Samba experts, I have a simple problem: i tried to use according to ch06_03.html manual page, directive revalidate in smb.conf config file. In smb.conf, i use directive security = share, but for a particular share (grant aces with user and pass) i want to use revalidate = yes option. The problem is that this feature is not working! 1. i used testparm to check the smb.conf file, and it

After updating my laptop ( compaq 6820s) to Centos 5.6 the sound is gone. The sound card is still detected but there is no sound from speaker Vendor: Intel Corporation Model: 82810H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller Module: snd-hda-intel On the same updated laptop the sound is working fine with an older kernel ( 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5.centos.plus ) I tried with no success ( sound related )

I have been reading about software raid. I configured my first software raid system about a month ago. I have 4 500 Gig drives configured in RAID 5 configuration with a total of 1.5TB. Currently I configured the complete individual drivers as software raid, then created a /dev/md0 with the drives I then created a /file_storage partition on /dev/md0. I created my /boot / and swap partitions on

My server returning an error sth. like swap = 0 then locking httpd and all other services is this normal this is a virtual machine and i give it 3 gb ram and 4cpu of i7 920 i have 1 gbit connection on this machine finally i have 4000+ clients at one time :S -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, somehow after a power failure i can't mount my ext3 partition :( mount /dev/hdd2 /mnt/gentoo/ mount: you must specify the filesystem type fdisk /dev/hdd The number of cylinders for this disk is set to 484521. There is nothing wrong with that, but this is larger than 1024, and could in certain setups cause problems with: 1) software that runs at boot time (e.g., old versions of LILO) 2)

i''m trying to limit upload and download but something is wrong(it is about NAT) i will post here my "script" maybe someone could tell me what is wrong my kernel(2.6.9) is patch with imq(linuximq.net) and my iptables(1.2.11) also #flush tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc del dev imq0 root tc qdisc del dev imq1 root ifconfig imq0 down

Hi, i tried to make a RAID5 Software Raid with 3 HDDs Disk /dev/xvdb: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0xe86f85d6 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/xvdb1 1 30401 244196001 fd Linux raid autodetect Disk /dev/xvdc: 250.0 GB,

Hello, I've searched endlessly a solution to my problem without any luck. I'm trying to mount a Windows XP share to a Debian box like this. mount -t //smbuser@192.168.0.2/test /mnt/test and it just gives me: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on //192.168.0.2/test, or too many mounted file systems it however works fine to smbclient //192.168.0.2/test -U smbuser any

it seems like I keep running into a wall. The present raid array...well let me do an fdisk -l: ---------------------------------------- Disk /dev/hda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 1 13 104391 fd Linux

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <small>Hi <br> After the installation of </small><small>Windows and L</small><small>inux on my desktop.I partitioned the disk space under Windows and kept the partitions as

Hi all I have a remote server (i.e SSH access only) which was incorrectly partitioned and I urgently need to get it up and running. It's got a 500GB HDD, but the PV is only 10GB big, so I can't add more LV's to to. P.S. This is on LVM, btw. [root at nd11176 ~]# fdisk -l /dev/sda Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders Units = cylinders

Hi, I have a RAID 1 (using mdadm) on CentOS Linux and in /proc/mdstat I see this: md7 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1] 26627648 blocks [2/2] [UU] [-->> it's OK] md1 : active raid1 sdb3[1] sda3[0] 4192896 blocks [2/2] [UU] [-->> it's OK] md2 : active raid1 sda5[0] sdb5[1] 4192832 blocks [2/2] [UU] [-->> it's OK] md3 : active raid1 sdb6[1] sda6[0] 4192832 blocks [2/2]