similar to: Shell script to list group members

Why does 'test -f' and 'test -e' return true on a (hidden) file that doesn't exist? *> cat /home/talberts/.forward* cat: /home/talberts/.forward: No such file or directory *> test -f /home/talberts/.forward ;echo $?* 1 *> test -e /home/talberts/.forward ;echo $?* 1 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: talberts.vcf

So I setup ssh on a server so I could do some work from home and I think the second I opened it every sorry monkey from around the world has been trying every account name imaginable to get into the system. What's a good way to deal with this?

Greetings, I'm a Fedora user likely going to switch to CentOS in the next few days. I'm wondering if anyone has some heads up advice for me? I am very familiar with FC6 and before so I anticipate few problems I haven't already seen (and know were fixed). The main reason for the move is so I don't have to re-install so frequently and hopefully not have to deal with so many

As I mentioned on this list before, I'm switching from Fedora 6 to Centos 5. I'm setting up the mail server and on Fedora I used the milter rpms for greylisting, spamassassin, mimedefant etc. However I don't see that those are included with Centos? Is this true, or do my yum repositories need to be changed to look in an 'extras' location? Or is there some other source

I'm finishing converting from POP to IMAP and I'm seeing some potentially powerful uses, but I wonder if my ideas aren't more abuses. I want to create 'multi-user' accounts that allow groups of users to archive and share emails with each other. For example, in the case of a sales department, emails from customers may have requests for new product features. I could create

I'm setting up multiple systems and ideally I want the same package configuration on all of them. So I'm going through yum and rpm queries manually to try and get this done. There must be a better way. Is there a way to use yum or rpm to configure multiple systems with the same packages? If yum or rpm has something native built into it to do this, that would be great. If

Greetings all, I'm a new user of Dovecot and want to say thanks for the great software. I am having a problem at the moment. I run a heterogeneous network with windows and Mac clients logging into a Fedora Linux 2 box running sendmail and previously UW-IMAP, but now Dovecot. I am using strictly pop3, plain authentication with mbox format. Every computer in the network is working fine with

I run 3 servers and I upgraded them from 5.1 to 5.2 this week without even a single glitch. So now that I've been running CentOS for a couple months, I wanted to take a minute to say... Thank you to CentOS, everyone on the list for the occasional technical support (and thanks to the upstream vendor). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

Hi. I have a samba server with 3000 users. I want to install another little server with a printer and I want to give access only to a group of users from the main server. [ MAIN ] [SAMBA-SERVER] | | | [little]-printer a group of users from MAIN can print [server] to this server Someone can give me a hint of how can I achieve this easily ? What document should I read ?

Hi all I am trying to get windows AD logins to work with Fedora 8/9 linux.I had the same setup working well with fedora 7 , but with fedora 8/9 the problem is whenever I do "getent passwd 'username'" the login shell is listed as /bin/false and users cannot login , even though I have set it to use template shell= /bin/bash in the smb.conf configuration file. Also I have made

Hi Friends, I am trying to write a shell script which can merge the 2 columns into 3rd one on Centos 5. The file is very long around 31200 rows having around 1370 unique groups and around 12000 unique user-names. The 1st column is the groupname and then 2nd column is the user-name. 1st Column (Groupname) 2nd Column (username) admin ankush

Hi, I have an index where each document contains an untokenized ''url'' field. I would like to query the index for the most popular urls. In SQL I would do this via a Group By clause. Is there anything in Ferret that will do something similar? I found this discussion that proposed a solution involving TermEnums:

Hi, Ive been trying to work out how to get wbinfo to list members of a specific AD group, rather than list groups a specific user is in. So far I have had no luck... In fact im not sure its possible with wbinfo. Is there another tool which could do this? James -- Sent using Dekko from my Ubuntu device

I have configure this folder share in samba : [share_name] Path = /home/folder With this acc?s : share root:group_name 2770 In my group ?group_name?, I?ve user1, user2, user3. Therefore the 3 users have complete acces in this folder. But in this one I have to add other folder shared : - /home/folder/ufold1 - /home/folder/ufold2 But I want the user1 have only an acces in the

On 01/04/2020 08:23, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 31/03/2020 22:48, David Kowis via samba wrote: >> Howdy! >> >> I'm setting up a domain controller, and things are going wonderfully, >> but I'm running into a strange problem, only some groups will display >> using the `samba-tool group show` command. >> >> <snip> >> root at

Thanks Rowland & Miguel, Sorry, I didn't know setting in share overrides setting in global. So I've in the global section "vfs objects = recycle acl_xattr", but it doesn't work either. getent group <GROUP_NAME> command returns the group name correctly (DOMAIN\group_name:x:10006:). Nicolas Le 23/02/2024 ? 10:23, Rowland Penny via samba a ?crit?: > On Fri,

On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:13:08 +0100 Nicolas Boiss? via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I have a Fedora server, part of a domain, on which various shares are > configured. > > For one share, I want to set up permissions according to the groups > to which the users belong. But it doesn't work. For example, I want > the share to be accessible

On 2020-04-01 05:51, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 01/04/2020 09:23, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 01/04/2020 08:23, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 31/03/2020 >> 22:48, David Kowis via samba wrote: >>> Howdy! >>> >>>> I'm setting up a domain controller, and things are going >>> >>>> wonderfully, but

Bugs item #2532, was opened at 2005-09-27 23:11 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=2532&group_id=85 Category: win32-etc Group: Code Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Daniel Berger (djberg96) Assigned to: Park Heesob (phasis68) Summary: Etc::Admin.configure_group problem Initial Comment: Ruby 1.8.2 Windows XP Pro

Hi I set up a samba 4.1.4 server on the latest FreeBSD RELEASE 10. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to consider the option force group. After hours ofresearch I couldn't figure out what I'm still missing. unix extensions is set to no. Setting the debug level up to 10 also didn't help ;( Is this a bug or is there simply a mistake in my setup? When *valid users = @Groupname* is