similar to: alias ip-addresses at loopback

On 06. aug. 2018 16:37, Oleg Cherkasov via samba wrote: > On 06. aug. 2018 15:15, Oleg Cherkasov via samba wrote: >> >> This morning three of our FreeBSD-11.1-p11 servers with Samba 4.7.7 >> installations started to ignore ACL settings and reject user access to >> shares.  All three servers are members of DC running on Windows Server >> 2008R2.  Everything has

W dniu 13.09.2018 o?22:19, Oleg Cherkasov pisze: > On 13. sep. 2018 21:02, Marcin Trendota wrote: >> >> There is nginx on port 80. >> I've turned off SELinux for testing purposes. >> >> [root at chamber ~]# nmap chamber -p80 >> [...] >> PORT?? STATE SERVICE >> 80/tcp open? http >> >> [root at chamber ~]# nmap -p80

If you add to vfs module to a share you also have to explicit add acl_xattr , that's what i do when i want to add another module and keep acl_xattr on the same share, if i'm not doing right way someone correct me . ----- Original Message ----- From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Cc: "Oleg Cherkasov"

On my CenOS7 system with stunnel from base stunnel-4.56-4.el7.x86_64 there's a systemd service file /etc/systemd/system/stunnel.service try sudo systemctl enable stunnel.service Hope this helps, K ?al?

Hi list, I have 3 Citrix Xenserver 5.6  and currently building a a VM backup server. I took the xe client on one of the server and installed it on the backup server (gentoo based) installed the stunnel package to make XE work. now when running, I get this error message : [server ­~ #] ./xe help -debug -s 192.168.111.17 -u user -pw pass Connecting via stunnel to [192.168.111.17] port [443]

Hi, This morning three of our FreeBSD-11.1-p11 servers with Samba 4.7.7 installations started to ignore ACL settings and reject user access to shares.  All three servers are members of DC running on Windows Server 2008R2.  Everything has been running ok for last few year.  I have been upgrading Samba and FreeBSD installations and on last Friday upgraded to the latest packages from

I used to put a line in rc.local to email root that my server rebooted. Does anyone have a nice systemd unit file to do the same? Also useful would be a shutdown email with the output of uptime. (I usually do that manually when rebooting for a kernel update.)

Hi Thomas, El 18/12/2014 22:25, Thomas B. R?cker <thomas at ruecker.fi> escribi?: > > On 12/18/2014 08:54 PM, Xabier Oneca -- xOneca wrote: >> >> Hello, Thomas, >> >> El 18/12/2014 21:35, Thomas B. R?cker <thomas at ruecker.fi> escribi?: >> > >> > On 12/18/2014 08:29 PM, Xabier Oneca -- xOneca wrote: >> > > >> > >

Hi, Can the Icecast stream be served over an ssl (https) connection? If so, can you please tell me how to accomplish this? Thanks, Daelynn. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20141218/185fa162/attachment.htm

The stunnel package doesn't come with an init script and systemctl doesn't list it as a service I recognize, I guess I could put it in /etc/rd.d/rc.local or create a script in /etc/rc.d/init.d but thought I'd ask before creating my own solution. Confidentiality Notice | This email and any included attachments may be privileged, confidential and/or otherwise protected from

Dovecot 2.3.4, FreeBSD 11.2 Due to comcast buisness ISP intercepting imaps I need to have my clients connect to non-standard port (9999). Previously I had been using stunnel to receive the imaps connection and forward it to the imap port over 127.0.0.1. But I would like to retire stunnel and have my imap clients connect remotely. I have configured the imap-login service - service imap-login {

Hi, I wonder if there are any tools to simplify transition from TDB to RID on existing system in production. Long story short, by mistake one of our servers were configured with default idmap set to a range: idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * : range = 3000-7999 The server had joined domain and everything works just fine however I may need to fix user/group ids and make it like

On Jul 21, 2019, at 11:50, Jorge Bastos via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > SSL/TLS is done via Stunnel Dirst, others have asked but I haven?t seen an answer, do you have any reason to think Outlook supports IMAP idle at all? I mean, I know outlook.com doesn?t support it, so maybe it just doesn?t work? Secondly, assuming Outlook does support IMAP idle, if you setup Dovecot to

Hi everybody! I'm trying to set up a secure samba connection across the net using Stunnel. With no joy. Any assistance would be appreciated. (c: I have four PC's. My Windows PC (192.168.0.10), my firewall (192.168.0.1 & 203.36.97.5), the office firewall (202.44.170.5 & 192.168.0.1), and the office file (Samba) server (192.168.0.15). On my office firewall I have the

Hi all Does anyone have a config file for stunnel, to work with /etc/xinetd.d? Stunnel's man page does mention it can work with xinetd, but there's no sample configuration for it. -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers

Yes, I am pretty sure about that. I originally was connected via AT&T DSL but wanted the fast access of cable modem. I need permanent IPs which required me to contract with Comcast buisness. Once I switched over, I was no longer able to access my imap server, which was as I mentioned, stunnel listening on the imaps port and forwarding to dovecot listening on the imap port. I was getting

Hi list: I started to make a quick GemPlugin command [ssl::start] that sets up an stunnel before calling the normal [start] command. so $ mongrel_rails ssl:start will do everything that start normally does and configure/setup an stunnel. The question... Obviously this plugin will require stunnel to be installed. What do you think is the best move: 1) nothing, just require that people

Hello - I'd like to encrypt rsync traffic over the wire, and for various reasons, I can't use ssh. I'd like to use SSL. Having spent the last day or so trying to wrap my brain around what that's going to take, I'm wondering if anyone has tried this before? Is it un-doable for one reason or another? TIA, -justinb

On 6/13/21 3:36 PM, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev wrote: > Haven't got many ideas on this today, preoccupied with other > house-work, but can share a couple :) > > Regarding two implementations - I believe NSS and OpenSSL are licensed > differently and/or are (initially were?) available non-overlapping on > different OSes. A quick googling now showed that they both were >

I upgraded dovecot two weeks ago from 0.99.10-0.rc2 to 0.99.10.4-1woody1 (both from the woody backport packages from braincells.com). Dovecot is using LDAP on a separate machine for authentication. (through stunnel if it matters) At 4:00 am, the LDAP server stops, dumps the ldap database, and then starts back up. Because the LDAP server is stopped, anyone who tries to authenticate during