similar to: alias ip-addresses at loopback

On 06. aug. 2018 16:37, Oleg Cherkasov via samba wrote: > On 06. aug. 2018 15:15, Oleg Cherkasov via samba wrote: >> >> This morning three of our FreeBSD-11.1-p11 servers with Samba 4.7.7 >> installations started to ignore ACL settings and reject user access to >> shares.  All three servers are members of DC running on Windows Server >> 2008R2.  Everything has

W dniu 13.09.2018 o?22:19, Oleg Cherkasov pisze: > On 13. sep. 2018 21:02, Marcin Trendota wrote: >> >> There is nginx on port 80. >> I've turned off SELinux for testing purposes. >> >> [root at chamber ~]# nmap chamber -p80 >> [...] >> PORT?? STATE SERVICE >> 80/tcp open? http >> >> [root at chamber ~]# nmap -p80

If you add to vfs module to a share you also have to explicit add acl_xattr , that's what i do when i want to add another module and keep acl_xattr on the same share, if i'm not doing right way someone correct me . ----- Original Message ----- From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Cc: "Oleg Cherkasov"

Hi, This morning three of our FreeBSD-11.1-p11 servers with Samba 4.7.7 installations started to ignore ACL settings and reject user access to shares.  All three servers are members of DC running on Windows Server 2008R2.  Everything has been running ok for last few year.  I have been upgrading Samba and FreeBSD installations and on last Friday upgraded to the latest packages from

I used to put a line in rc.local to email root that my server rebooted. Does anyone have a nice systemd unit file to do the same? Also useful would be a shutdown email with the output of uptime. (I usually do that manually when rebooting for a kernel update.)

Hi, I wonder if there are any tools to simplify transition from TDB to RID on existing system in production. Long story short, by mistake one of our servers were configured with default idmap set to a range: idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * : range = 3000-7999 The server had joined domain and everything works just fine however I may need to fix user/group ids and make it like

I have vsftp chrooted so that users can only come into their home directory. I have a few virtual hosts. I have the websites in the home directory of the intial user for each site. So the sites look like this. /home/user1/html /home/user2/html Using vsftp, I have set the default to chroot a user to their home directory. So user1 ftping in whill go right to his directory and not be able to go

Every now and then I get an alert like this one. I have no clue what this "rear" subsystem is, or why madam would be trying to write to its log file. Can anyone enlighten me? thanks in advance! ------------------------- SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/mdadm from write access on the file /var/log/rear/rear-fcshome.log.lockless. ***** Plugin restorecon (93.9 confidence) suggests

Hi, Greg, Eddie, I found that in SR-IOV + HVM environment, ping latency depends on ping interval. The NIC is Intel 82576 (1000Mbps), server uses xen-4.0.1, domain-0 is kernel-2.6.32 and HVM is kernel-2.6.31. The server and client are connected through a 1000Mbps switch. The data is as following: # ping -i 1 192.168.0.21 PING 192.168.0.21 (192.168.0.21) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from

Sometime in the past two weeks, Some kind person pointed me to a GREAT document file that explained all those commands you find in the ifcfg-* files and the network file (and others, I believe). It was a great help to me, and now I need it again, and I did not write down the file location, nor can I find that original note. My bad, I am busy documenting everything I can now. But I really

On my CenOS7 system with stunnel from base stunnel-4.56-4.el7.x86_64 there's a systemd service file /etc/systemd/system/stunnel.service try sudo systemctl enable stunnel.service Hope this helps, K ?al?

On 08. aug. 2018 22:30, Dante Colo wrote: > > If you add to vfs module to a share you also have to explicit add acl_xattr , that's what i do when i want to add another module and keep acl_xattr on the same share, if i'm not doing right way someone correct me . > I am already have 'vfs objects = zfsacl' set for my ZFS shares so acl_xattr does not help at all.

Hi, this has nothing to do with CentOS but with your router which does not support using the public IP from inside your network (which is quite common). If the port is open on your router when you access it from another public IP then all is well. Regards, Michel On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 09:43 +0200, Marcin Trendota wrote: > W dniu 13.09.2018 o 22:19, Oleg Cherkasov pisze: > > On 13.

On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 15:17:56 +0200 Oleg Cherkasov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if there are any tools to simplify transition from TDB to > RID on existing system in production. Long story short, by mistake > one of our servers were configured with default idmap set to a range: > > idmap config * : backend = tdb > idmap config * :

Hi list, I have 3 Citrix Xenserver 5.6  and currently building a a VM backup server. I took the xe client on one of the server and installed it on the backup server (gentoo based) installed the stunnel package to make XE work. now when running, I get this error message : [server ­~ #] ./xe help -debug -s 192.168.111.17 -u user -pw pass Connecting via stunnel to [192.168.111.17] port [443]

Greetings, Launching the virt-manager yeilds following error Error polling connection 'qemu:///system': internal error Cannot find suitable emulator for x86_64 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/engine.py", line 440, in _tick conn.tick() File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/connection.py", line 1414, in tick

Hi all. I am currently building a small test cloud based on Eucalyptus 2.0.3 and CentOS 5.8 x64. I have a choice which hypervisor to use: KVM or XEN. KVM is the default in CentOS 6 but I have read also many good things (for example PV guest machines, isolation between Dom0 and DomU) about XEN. Key factors from my opint of view are: - stability (which one runs more smoothly on CentOS?) -

Hi all. I am currently building a small test cloud based on Eucalyptus 2.0.3 and CentOS 5.8 x64. I have a choice which hypervisor to use: KVM or XEN. KVM is the default in CentOS 6 but I have read also many good things (for example PV guest machines, isolation between Dom0 and DomU) about XEN. Key factors from my opint of view are: - stability (which one runs more smoothly on CentOS?) -

I'd like to host multiple domains though a central dovecot proxy - however, I need to present different certs to different hostnames (which are on different IPs). I can't see a way to this in the documentation, is it possible? thanks, Ian

I use since a lot of time a "classical" two-interfaces setup, with the net interface connected to an ADSL modem in half-bridge mode, which receives a public IP from the ISP and gives it to the Linux net interface; the lan interface has the 192.168.30.0/24 class. Now I need to change this setup, because my new ISP (that will switch soon to a FTTS VDSL2 connection) sent me a VDSL2