similar to: gv

Can't connect to network even with no security. Is this possibly a firmware issue? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090401/7c80deca/attachment-0003.sig>

I need to get a wireless device for an upcoming trip (USB is preferable to PCMCIA for a long list of reasons) and I'm wondering if anyone has any experience with or recommendations for such items, particularly which ones work with Linux/CentOS. Right now I'm debating between a reasonably cheap Belkin 54G and a slightly more expensive Netgear 54G. Thanks. mhr

where can I find packages for hplip and it's deps for centos4x?

Hello everybody, I am somewhat confused by the following method within the LLVM, especially the lines "confusion starts" -> "confusion ends" are hard to follow. Maybe the idea is that if there are such big data structures one does not waste much memory anyway if they are aligned to a 16-byte boundary. However, my assembler complains here because it only supports 1-, 2-,

Hi Fabian, > I am somewhat confused by the following method within the LLVM, > especially the lines > "confusion starts" -> "confusion ends" are hard to follow. yes, this seems like a wart. It has been there ever since Chris added the getPreferredAlignmentLog method in commit 25978. Maybe he can comment on whether the code to bump up the alignment for big

Hi list, On my system I have gv 3.5.8 and it does not like to be called with --spartan before the <filename>. The man-page is stating that the file name has to come before all arguments and the --spartan is actually -spartan. I don't know for newer versions of gv. The attached patch fixes that for me. Please apply if appropriate. thanks, Patrick. -------------- next part

Hi Folks, This is off-topic R-wise, but it may be close to the heart of many R-users, so I think it may be the best place to ask! Users of 'gv' (the "front end" to ghostscript) will be aware of the little window which gives you the x-y coordinates (in points = 1/72 inch) of the position of the "cross-hair" mouse cursor. These coordinates are those of the corresponding

Hi there folks I have R 1.3.0 running on Red Hat Linux 7.1 with GhostView 3.5.8. When I produce a file like: > bitmap("foo.pdf", type="pdfwrite") > plot(foo) > dev.off() and then try to read it with gv, I get an unrecoverable error and nothing displayed. Any help as to whether this ***should*** work would be appreciated. cheers, John -- John Williams

Is sendpage or some other alphanumeric paging program available from one of the repos for CentOS 5? I've checked rpmforge and epel. I just wanted to check to see if it might be available somewhere else before I resort to building from source. -- Bowie

On Mar 9, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Fabian, > >> I am somewhat confused by the following method within the LLVM, >> especially the lines >> "confusion starts" -> "confusion ends" are hard to follow. > > yes, this seems like a wart. It has been there ever since Chris added the > getPreferredAlignmentLog method in commit

I've set up google voice to chat with me: Forwards calls to: <me>@gmail.com and xmpp: [general] debug=no ; Enable debugging (disabled by default). autoprune=yes ; Auto remove users from buddy list. Depending on your ; setup (ie, using your personal Gtalk account for a test)

What's the best bet for getting vpnc on v5.1? Compile from cource, DAG repo, other repo? Compiled from source I can't seem to get a response from the target. THANKS, Terry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL:

Hello Julien, I think the reason for the change was because there is processor context information stored in the type in 2.6. The reason it's there is to support multicore JIT architecture. --Sam ----- Original Message ---- > From: Julien Lerouge <jlerouge at apple.com> > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009

On 3/21/11 2:00 PM, Damien Vincent wrote: > I reply to myself... I didn't go in the right direction in my previous > email. > > There is an easy way to tell if a GlobalValue corresponds to data or code: > const GlobalValue *GV; > if(Function::classof(GV)) > ... // process the global value as a function > else > ... // process the global value as data > >

Hi, I have: ... @.str1 = private unnamed_addr constant [21 x i8] c"Now f is a function\0A\00", align 1 ; Function Attrs: ssp uwtable define i32 @_Z1fv() #2 { entry: %call = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* getelementptr inbounds ([21 x i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) ret i32 0 } Then I get after trying to erase the function from the module: 511

I am building three identical systems. Well they will have different host names, and with time the software setups will drift. But at install time they are identical. Is there some way, (with dd I might guess) to do a hardare level copy? All three drives are Hitachi DK23DA-40F (40Gb). Supposedly factory reconditioned (they are in sealed bags with a drive sticker stating: "Refurbished

On Sat, Apr 6, 2019, at 10:04 AM, sean darcy wrote: > On 4/5/19 10:36 AM, sean darcy wrote: > > I'm trying to set up pjsip to work with an obi202 and google voice. But > > I can't configure the endpoint. > > > > pjsip: > > > > [obi202-auth](!) > > type = auth > > auth_type = userpass > > password = <mypass> > > >

I'm trying to set up pjsip to work with an obi202 and google voice. But I can't configure the endpoint. pjsip: [obi202-auth](!) type = auth auth_type = userpass password = <mypass> [obi202-aor](!) type = aor max_contacts = 2 ; ===== endpoints ======== [gv-voice](obi202-endpoint) auth = gv-voice aors = gv-voice identify_by=auth_username ;identify_by=username ; I also tried

In the following IR module: – define i8 @foo() #0 { entry: %call0 = call i8 @bar() ret i8 %call0 } declare i8 @bar() #1 – @bar() gets marked as its own user in top-of-tree LLVM. I patched the Verifier to check it (but didn’t commit the patch): – Index: lib/IR/Verifier.cpp =================================================================== --- lib/IR/Verifier.cpp (revision 203468) +++

I reply to myself... I didn't go in the right direction in my previous email. There is an easy way to tell if a GlobalValue corresponds to data or code: const GlobalValue *GV; if(Function::classof(GV)) ... // process the global value as a function else ... // process the global value as data Damien On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Damien Vincent <damien.llvm at