similar to: rspec-ext 0.0.1

Hello, I have played a bit on a negative specification idea: http://rashkovskii.com/articles/2007/1/25/rspec-specify_negatively What do you think about it? Yurii Rashkovskii Technology Director Railsware.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20070125/12c4f473/attachment.html

Hello, Just decided to check whether I am doing something that makes sense or not. I was thinking about how cool would it be to re-use examples (just like we reuse story scenarios with GivenScenario). I was not sure if this possibility already exists in rspec (and, honestly, was lazy to check), so I have created this helper: def given_it(name) example_definition =

I''ve become very fond of Yurii Rashkovskii''s "aspects". For such a simple change they make it a LOT easier to navigate, read and verify specs. Are there any plans to include something like this in RSpec? Ashley

Hello, Just thought it could be interesting for some of you. I''ve written rspecs for acts_as_authenticated plugin. http://rashkovskii.com/articles/2007/01/01/rspec-on-rails- acts_as_authenticated I''m not sure they are 100% ok, but they seem to be :) Thank you, Yurii.

Hey, May be it is just too deep night over here and I''m missing something though I got this failure on {{{response.should_not redirect_to}}}: ''QueuesController should allow authenticated user to access ''show'''' FAILED Matcher does not support should_not. See Spec::Matchers for more information about matchers. Also I''ve found this in

Hi. I''m upgrading a project from an 0.8.0 pre-release gem to 0.8.2. I''ve installed the 0.8.2 gem, and the rspec_on_rails 0.8.2 plugin: ruby script/plugin install svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/tags/REL_0_8_2/rspec When I try to run my specs though, I get the below error. It''s as if the spec_helper cannot find "spec/rails". I''ve noticed that

Hey Gang, Running into a weird error when trying to follow puppetlabs'' blog: https://puppetlabs.com/blog/the-next-generation-of-puppet-module-testing/ I''m running 10.8.2, using default ruby, in an attempt to make my home env a little more sane, (ran into weird rbenv issues at work, which I won''t go into here) The google tells me not a whole lot. Appreciate any help

The new "pending" example feature reminds me of a feature I''ve been bouncing around in my head, to aid in refactoring. Often, when I''m changing existing behaviour, I know that certain aspects of the old behaviour should change. Imagine changing the "it" method to perhaps "not" or "old" or "removed"... The behaviour would be to

We''d like to get some feedback on RSpec 0.9 before we start pushing out releases via Rubyforge''s gem server and update the website. We have therefore made the first beta of 0.9 available - both prepackaged and tagged in subversion (see below). RSpec 0.9 introduces a new API for expectations, which essentially means that your underscores go away (there has been other discussions

I''m trying to get rspec-puppet working and have run into a problem. I have a VM running ubuntu lucid, have installed rubygems 1.3.5 from the apt package and have install rspec-puppet (and other required gems), and rake, using gem install. I''ve run rspec-puppet-init in the module I want to test, and have created a very basic spec file for one of the classes in my module.

I am using puppet 2.7.14 on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. I have the following gems: *** LOCAL GEMS *** diff-lcs (1.1.3) hiera (0.3.0) hiera-puppet (0.3.0) metaclass (0.0.1) mocha (0.12.1) puppet-lint (0.1.13) puppetlabs_spec_helper (0.2.0) rake (0.9.2.2) rspec (2.11.0) rspec-core (2.11.1) rspec-expectations (2.11.2) rspec-mocks (2.11.1) rspec-puppet (0.1.3) When I run "rake help" I get the

First up, congratulations to the team on RSpec 1.0.0! RSpec is one of the most vibrant and professionally-run projects in the world of Ruby open source. Now that there is a commitment to a stable API I think we''ll see RSpec really take off. Two quick things... In the absence of official Spec::UI docs, can Spec::UI be installed as a Rails plug-in? eg. script/plugin install

Hey, just posting in case this is of interest. I just recently wrote a Rails plugin to convert Rails Test::Unit cases to RSpec. http://www.davidjrice.co.uk/articles/2007/8/12/ruby-on-rails-plugin- test-unit-to-rspec-converter it''s not going to work 100% in every case, but it''s really helped me convert old tests to the lovely RSpec :) Best, Dave --- David Rice

I''ve decided that I want to use more automated tests because I''ve been intrigued by the idea of BDD. I am new to using tests, so I''m curious if there have been any writeup on using rSpec. This is one of the only ones I''ve found: http://blog.teksol.info/articles/2005/11/17/building-a-plugin-on-rspec It seems that the benefit of BDD is that it makes it

Do have the latest versions? RSpec-1.0.3 ZenTest-3.6.0 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jonathan Linowes <jonathan at parkerhill.com> Date: May 29, 2007 11:47 AM Subject: Re: [rspec-users] questions rspec on rails To: rspec-users <rspec-users at rubyforge.org> Hi, I should have mentioned I already did that. Here''s my spec.opts file --colour --format progress

Hi, I''ve hacked together a setup to load an RSpec backtrace into jEdit (in other words, you''ll be able to click the relevant failed behaviour or error to go straight the relevant file and line). More info here: http://textgoeshere.org.uk/articles/2008/03/howto-integrate-rspec-on-rails-with-jedit/ -- Dave Nolan http://textgoeshere.org.uk -------------- next part --------------

Hi all, tried posting this to rspec group but w/o success so hope someone on this list might be able to help me out as am kind of stuck: Can anyone tell me why I am getting this error trying to ''rake spec'': ''kernel.rb:27:in `should'': uninitialized constant RSpec::Expectations (NameError)''. Can''t seem to find a useful reference online to

Hey all, you HAVE to read this blog post: http://blog.jrock.us/articles/RSpec%20vs.%20Test::More.pod#comments My favorite parts are: 1) ... some rspec code ... > For the sake of comparison lets translate this directly into perl: ... some perl code ... 2) >First, notice that the rspec-version isn''t actually ruby code. It''s not any real language. For the sake of

These are patch releases recommended for anybody who has already upgraded to 2.10. ### rspec-mocks-2.10.1 full changelog: http://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/compare/v2.10.0...v2.10.1 Bug fixes * fix [regression of edge case behavior](https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/issues/132) * fixed failure of `object.should_receive(:message).at_least(0).times.and_return value` * fixed failure

rspec-2.3.0 is released (including rspec, rspec-core, rspec-mocks, rspec-expecations and rspec-rails). ### rspec-core-2.3.0 / 2010-12-12 [full changelog](http://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/compare/v2.2.1...v2.3.0) * Enhancements * tell autotest to use "rspec2" if it sees a .rspec file in the project''s root directory * replaces the need for ./autotest/discover.rb,