similar to: bind-9.3.4-6.0.2.P1.el5_2 and rrset-order: order 'fixed' not fully implemented

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0533 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: c2c6d8ced889948d7a52fbbb577ec2ff bind-9.3.4-6.0.1.P1.el5_2.x86_64.rpm 0c66970cb9b1b46e7f8210c638134ba7 bind-chroot-9.3.4-6.0.1.P1.el5_2.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0533 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: c56c92553eb90170033acee5bb59452b bind-9.3.4-6.0.1.P1.el5_2.i386.rpm b29a740114dad7c05298c3d918d58d9f bind-chroot-9.3.4-6.0.1.P1.el5_2.i386.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hello all, I was upgrading a CentOS 5.1 box to 5.2 remotely, and I lost my ssh connection to the server. Now when I rerun the "yum upgrade" it fails due to conflicts in the transaction check stage. Before I dig myself a deeper hole, I think I need advice. The original error I received was a conflict between python-devel and python, so I erased python-devel with the plan to

hi, i want to setup DNS server on centos 5.0, and find the preinstalled version is bind.x86_64 30:9.3.3-7.el5 , and bind.x86_64 30:9.3.3-9.0.1.el5 in the updates repository. but i need to upgrade bind to version 9.3.4-P1 to prevent from any known security bugs is there any way i can do ? thanks, Bell

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0939 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0939.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 2a5a0475d9805d5a5015aa32a0fd4f73 openoffice.org-base-2.3.0-6.5.4.el5_2.x86_64.rpm f36ad127a900681d7eefdb1ff4bf97a1

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0835 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0835.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 6c7274c7baf77c6617c4e0c9d371110d openoffice.org-base-2.3.0-6.5.2.el5_2.x86_64.rpm 443406a4b900861e6398bb7a921b99de

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0835 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0835.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: e10c9e07efefd333d3a1158a7c05e81a openoffice.org-base-2.3.0-6.5.2.el5_2.i386.rpm 46eb980cab8a8aa57f75309951a300a1

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0939 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0939.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 8cc4ab1813731a62d721966757df98e2 openoffice.org-base-2.3.0-6.5.4.el5_2.i386.rpm c18449d4afafded63009d28db9259914

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0584 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0584.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 4cfba549f6586536dd4b6d41f5ffe14a finch-2.3.1-2.el5_2.i386.rpm e8b15357285ff047b542fb2d2b3815ae finch-2.3.1-2.el5_2.x86_64.rpm

hi Jim Perrin, thanks for your great info as following: No, and this is not the case. The bind version provided with centos (all versions) has security fixes backported into them. Do not rely on the version numbers as a means of assuming security fixes. See http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html for details. regards, Bell

Updating old CentOS 4 DNS servers to CentOS 5, one of our zones has a number of entries with underscores in. Starting named results in the following error and named refusing to start. masters/example.com.db:33: mail_server.example.com: bad owner name (check-names) I've tried including check-names master ignore; in the options but this isn't making any difference. I've read a lot

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0597 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0597.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: devhelp-0.12-18.el5_2.i386.rpm devhelp-0.12-18.el5_2.x86_64.rpm devhelp-devel-0.12-18.el5_2.i386.rpm devhelp-devel-0.12-18.el5_2.x86_64.rpm firefox-3.0.1-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0584 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0584.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 4cfba549f6586536dd4b6d41f5ffe14a finch-2.3.1-2.el5_2.i386.rpm aad2d01f126b8f92f29e0b7ee79811f7 finch-devel-2.3.1-2.el5_2.i386.rpm

Hi, as discussed before, we're trying to make use of SSHFP records (RFC 4255) to publish host key fingerprints in the DNS. However, some non-OpenBSD platforms don't support DNSSEC in the native resolver (e.g. glibc), which renders the whole thing quite useless, since openssh correctly requires the RRs to be signed and validated. The following patch adds support for ldns, an external