similar to: NFS issues

I have installed nut 2.0 Var/log/messages: Aug 14 16:37:26 server kernel: hiddev96: USB HID v1.10 Device [American Power Conversion Back-UPS BF500 FW:814.s3.I USB FW:s3] on usb-0000:00:1d.0-1 Aug 14 16:37:26 server kernel: hub 5-0:1.0: USB hub found Aug 14 16:37:26 server kernel: hub 5-0:1.0: 2 ports detected My ups.conf : [APC350] driver = apcsmart port = /dev/usb/hidddev96 desc =

Hello, Is it possible to group many nodes together? Suppose I have a large number of machines that I all want to have the same config - rather than specify them as individual nodes each inheriting the same config, I''d like to say that a group inherits a config, and define the group elsewhere. Does this sort of construction already exist? Could it be cobbled together from what we

Hi I was wondering, what is the state on getting a more updated version of KVM onto centos? I've found some 3rd party repos by I'm curious if one could expect a new supported KVM soon or will it not get in until EL6?

On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 08:57:44AM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: > It seems that {rpc.}lockd no longer runs after the ino64 changes on any > of my systems after a full rebuild of src and ports. No log entries > offer any insight as to why :-( > > imb I don't tend to use NFS on my systems that are running head, so I haven't had occasion to test this as stated. However, I

My environment is "heterogeneous" my authentication and home server are currently stuck on a 1G shared network, the production servers and storage servers are on a bonded 40G network, all are in the same VLAN. I have about 100 servers on the 40GB bonded network each with 12cores and 128GB of memory. They are running centos 6.6 Except for my storage servers they are all just running

Hello, I am attempting to get flock/file locking working between my -stable (updated ~19 may) nfs file server and -current desktop; the server is running lockd/statd, and both my mail client (mutt) and a simple perl program complain that files on the nfs server cannot be locked. I am aware that there has been work on the nfs locking code in current, and have a vague recollection of a workaround

hey list! I am attempting to shore up some centos machines (ranging from centos 5 to centos 5.4) for pci compliance by changing the port that nlockdmgr listens on to function under a privileged port. So what I did was try to hardcode the port by editing /etc/sysconfig/nfs # TCP port rpc.lockd should listen on. LOCKD_TCPPORT=1011 # UDP port rpc.lockd should listen on. LOCKD_UDPPORT=1011 #

Running the nightly from two days ago. The Dovecot log shows no errors, but I keep getting login errors for a few users. top shows: 71486 user1 1 96 0 4552K 2408K lockd 0 0:00 0.00% imap 11170 user2 1 96 0 4440K 2480K lockd 0 0:00 0.00% imap And a ps aux shows that these processes have been open for hours. If I move the mbox that contains their mail, the same

Hi Rowland, Thank you for replying. Please find the output here below. Just a possible tip: _kerberos._tcp.example.com??? service = 0 100 88 addc-new.example.com. output is present on the new machine but if we issue a host -t SRV _kerberos._tcp.example.com on addc2 it does not appear in the list. Kind regards. Collected config? --- 2019-12-18-20:30 ----------- Hostname: addc-new DNS Domain:

Hello, is dotlock supposed to work with NFS? I noticed that the default-locking method causes problems even with nfslockd started. Regards Marten

Hi, The NFS server is running FreeBSD 6.0, and no problems with other NFS client with FreeBSD 6. When a new client with FreeBSD 7 comes, the NFS server always says: Apr 2 03:52:01 xxxx rpc.lockd: clntudp_create: RPC: Program not registered Apr 2 03:52:01 xxxx rpc.lockd: Unable to return result to 192.168.4.248 The 192.168.4.248's OS is FreeBSD 7, and it can successfully mount the

Hi all, Trying to test libvirt 1.1.3 with virtlockd locking my qcow2 images on a NFS storage between two kvm hosts. ./configure ... --with-init-script=upstart Libvirtd upstart script is actually well generated but I can't see nothing about virtlockd... or am I blind ? :) Nevertheless, running virtlockd -d && service libvirtd restart works fine. Am I wrong thinking that editing

Greetings, We use NFSv4 on our cluster and perform distributed indexing (well, we used to on our previous system which used a simple touch() locking mechanism). I'm having a spot of bother getting Xapian to obtain a lock (hangs on fcntl64()). I've read http://trac.xapian.org/wiki/XapianOverNFS and other list posts, and noted that a lock daemon should be running to allow locks

Hello, we are using ctdb 4.15.5 on RHEL8 (Kernel 4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64) to provide NFS v3 (via tcp) to RHEL7/8 clients. Whenever an ip takeover happens most clients report something like this: [Mon Feb 13 12:21:22 2023] nfs: server x.x.253.252 not responding, still trying [Mon Feb 13 12:21:28 2023] nfs: server x.x.253.252 not responding, still trying [Mon Feb 13 12:22:31 2023] nfs: server

Hi list, I would like to ask a clarification about how locking works. My test system is CentOS 7.7 with libvirt-4.5.0-23.el7_7.1.x86_64 Is was understanding that, by default, libvirt does not use any locks. From here [1]: "The out of the box configuration, however, currently uses the nop lock manager plugin". As "lock_manager" is commented in my qemu.conf file, I was

Hello. We have a number of Xen 3.4.2. boxes which have constant iowaits at around 10% with spikes up to 100% when accessing data over NFS. We have been unable to nail down the issue. Any advice? System info: release : 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5xen version : #1 SMP Thu May 13 13:49:53 EDT 2010 machine : x86_64 nr_cpus : 16 nr_nodes

Hi, My setup: Solaris 9, /var/mail is NFS mounted from another Solaris 9 box, home directories and dovecot index stuff is on local ufs filesystems. I upgraded from alpha4 to a5 about 36 hours ago. Dovecot is configured like so during the build: VERSION=1.0.alpha5 CC=gcc CFLAGS="-g -O" CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/openssl/include LDFLAGS=-L/opt/openssl/lib \ ./configure

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:33, Alan Bartlett <ajb.stxsl at googlemail.com> wrote: > The subject line for this "conversation / thread" reads: > "Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?" > The contents, however, relates to XFS & the CentOSPlus kernel. > Filipe, please take care with what you do. :-) Very sorry about that. Fixed it now. In

Hi all, I have setup a CentOS6.3 x86_64 host to act as a nfs server. According to RHEL6 docs, portmap is not needed when you use NFSv4, but in my host I need to start rpcbind service to make NFSv4 works. My /etc/sysconfig/nfs # # Define which protocol versions mountd # will advertise. The values are "no" or "yes" # with yes being the default MOUNTD_NFS_V2="no"

Hi all, I am running a set of logistic regressions, where we want to use some weights, and I am not sure whether what I am doing is reasonable or not. The dependent variable is turnout in an election - i.e. survey respondents were asked whether or not they voted. The percentage of those who say they voted is much higher than the actual turnout, probably due both to non-response bias and social