similar to: MRTG Problem - no traffic recorded

Hallo xenusers, I search a simple variant to generate CPU,Load for MRTG. Actually I use following configuration. But I see CPU-usage of xen0 only, not a summary of all VM. - net-snmp does not support xen [1]. - dtc-xen [2] show CPU-usage from each VM, but not summary. This view is confusing. [3] For monitorings from more than 3 physical machines unpractically. - enomalism [4] is too large

I found a error in my script but that is fixed in this version. /Rickard Eriksson -------------- next part -------------- #!/usr/bin/perl # Version: 1.1 # This is a script to use with mrtg to count shorewall entrys in the log. # # Updates can be found at: http://ftp.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/contrib/ # Made by Rickard Eriksson riceri@home.se # # Here you can see what i have in my mrtg config

Hello, I have a problem with simple traffic shapping in shorewall, my current configuration is: zones vlan10 ipv4 # interfaces vlan10 vlan10 detect tcpflags,routeback shorewall.conf TC_ENABLED=Simple tcinterfaces vlan10 Internal 1mbit:50kb shorewall show tc Device vlan10: qdisc prio 5: root refcnt 2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Hi! I have 2 DC, now add one more DC, but all dcs dont view between they. New DC is "DC2" DC1 - vlan10 -> OK to DC3(Connectad by openvpn) DC1 -> vlan10 -> OK to DC2(vlan50) DC2-> vlan50 -> OK to DC1(vlan10) DC2-> Openvpn -> Dont "see" DC3 DC3 -> Openvpn -> OK to DC1(vlan10) DC3 -> Openvpn -> Dont "view" DC2(vlan50) All version

Hi! Thanks for answer. But, i allowed all ports in my firewall... I tested, shutdown  my DC1 DC2 dont comunication with DC3 I create user in DC2, dont replication with DC3... I waited more in 20 minutes Why ?? Regards; On 17-05-2018 12:01, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 5/17/2018 10:30 AM, Carlos via samba wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I have 2 DC, now add one more DC, but all dcs

hi i've setup the following on debian etch with bridge-utils 1.4 (backported) and kernel 2.6.26 from backports.org: vlan10 with raw device eth0 vlan20 with raw device eth0 br10 with initial port vlan10 br20 with initial port vlan20 i've set hw addr to DE:AD:BE:EF:34:10 for br10 and DE:AD:BE:EF:34:20 for br20 the bridges are used to connect virtual machine nic's. "brctl

Hi! In Option "Inter-Site Transports", i have only  one the name "DEFAULTIPSITELINK" , in properties Sites in this link: Matriz Filial Matriz -> site with DC1 and DC2 Filail ->  site With DC3 Regards; On 17-05-2018 13:12, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 5/17/2018 12:07 PM, Carlos wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Thanks for answer. >> >> But, i allowed

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua> wrote: > Hello FrancisM, > > Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote: > > > > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is failing > to > > bring-up. So this is what Im doing > > > in my DATA trunk port at my HomeLab Im doing this > > > 2 port

On 5/17/2018 3:58 PM, Carlos wrote: > > Hi! > > In "NTDS settings" created new connection for: > > DC2 ->DC3 > > DC3 -> DC2 > > All OK, > > I tested with option > > kccsrv:samba_kcc=No > > is ok too. > > But in my DC2, a received one erro: > > May 17 16:54:44 dc2 samba[10421]: [2018/05/17 16:54:44.543336,  0] >

Hello, I''m trying to setup an 8 port wan configuration (pptp+pppoe) with one vlan trunk. My internal networks are : LAN(eth9): 10.0.0.0/16 VLAN10(eth9) 10.10.0.0/24 VLAN20(eth9) 10.20.0.0/24 VLAN30(eth9) 10.30.0.0/24 VLAN100(eth9) 10.100.0.0/24 I would like to post my configuration here since i don''t success to do the following: 1. Communicate between VLANxx to LAN

Hello all, I need a virtual firewall/router solution. I''m thinking of a netscreen 1000 but I want to know if it can be done in Linux. Here is my idea: 1 Linux box 2 GigE interfaces 1 interface setup with a public IP address ($PUBIP) 1 interface setup with 802.1q VLAN trunking with 100 vlans assigned ($VLAN1-$VLAN100) a /25 subnet routed to $PUBIP from my core routers All $VLAN

I'm trying to get MRTG up and running on CentOS, but the displayed http page says that I don't have permission to access /mrtg/ on the server. Here are my commands yum install mrtg vim /etc/httpd/conf.d/mrtg.conf /etc/init.d/httpd restart cfgmaker --global 'WorkDir: /var/www/mrtg' --global 'Options[_]: bits,growright' --output /etc/mrtg/mrtg.cfg public at 10.200.200.1

Hello, I''m receiving this error while restarting/starting Shorewall : Processing /etc/shorewall/init ... WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan20 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan10 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan30 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan50 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan100 My route -n

On Thursday, 7 April 2016, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 April 2016 at 19:21, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > Hello James, > > > > Wednesday, April 6, 2016, 5:34:26 PM, you wrote: > > > > > Note that this is pretty much the last use case you cannot use > > >

Hey guys, I have a question regarding shorewall and vrf functionality. I have shorewall 3.4.8 and kernel 2.6.24-gentoo-r8 I have tried to use iproute2 (ip route and ip rule) to establish multiple routing tables. The biggest problem seems to be, that I cannot add interfaces such as vlan interfaces to the routing table. My target is that linux takes attention of on which vlan interface

Hello FrancisM, Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote: > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is failing to > bring-up. So this is what Im doing > in my DATA trunk port at my HomeLab Im doing this > 2 port configured for teaming1 (set as link only port) -> Create Bridge > (br0 port) on top of the teaming1 -> create slave vlan10,20,30,40

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:51 PM, FrancisM <francis at mytechrepublic.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua> wrote: > >> Hello FrancisM, >> >> Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote: >> >> >> > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is >> failing to

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:20 PM, FrancisM <francis at mytechrepublic.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:51 PM, FrancisM <francis at mytechrepublic.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello FrancisM, >>> >>> Thursday, April 7,

On 5/17/2018 12:07 PM, Carlos wrote: > Hi! > > Thanks for answer. > > But, i allowed all ports in my firewall... > > I tested, shutdown  my DC1 > > DC2 dont comunication with DC3 > > I create user in DC2, dont replication with DC3... > I waited more in 20 minutes > > Why ?? > > Regards; > > > On 17-05-2018 12:01, lingpanda101 wrote: >>

Hi! In "NTDS settings" created new connection for: DC2 ->DC3 DC3 -> DC2 All OK, I tested with option kccsrv:samba_kcc=No is ok too. But in my DC2, a received one erro: May 17 16:54:44 dc2 samba[10421]: [2018/05/17 16:54:44.543336,  0] ../source4/dsdb/repl/drepl_out_helpers.c:1087(dreplsrv_update_refs_done) May 17 16:54:44 dc2 samba[10421]:   UpdateRefs failed with