similar to: Fetchmail pop server and clean spam messages

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Fetchmail pop server and clean spam messages"

2019 Jun 17
5
Postfix and choice of RBL
Hi, I'm managing several mail servers running CentOS 7, Postfix and Dovecot. SpamAssassin is filtering mail nicely, but I'm considering using RBL (blacklists) to take some load off the servers. General question to those of you who use RBL. Which lists do you recommend using? Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Site :
2006 Oct 25
11
spam control
Gents, I have added the following to /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and rebuilt it trying to control spam. I still get about 25 spam messages a day. Is there something else that can help control spam? Thanks jerry --------------------------- dnl # dnl # dnsbl - DNS based Blackhole List/Black List/Rejection list dnl # See http://www.sendmail.org/m4/features.html#dnsbl dnl # FEATURE(`dnsbl',
2006 Nov 21
1
QMAIL - RBLSMTP - HOW to WHITELIST
Dear Friend, I done configuration using RBLSMTPD with WHITELIST, but I don't know it is correct. Please check files below are corrects. Thanks Adriano === FILE WHITELIST.DOMINIO.RBL. ==== $ttl 900 whitelist.dominio.rbl. IN SOA host1.xxxxxx.com. root.xxxxx.com. ( 2006112002 ; serial; 3600 ; refresh period (1 hora); 900 ; retry time (15 minutos); 1800 ; expire tiem (30 minutos); 900 ;
2007 Mar 14
5
sendmail and rbl blocking - generating statistics
I have enabled the feature in sendmail.mc to check with spamhaus for spammers. However since this block is being made at MTA level, I would like to know is something can be done to obtain statistics of blocked attemps. thanks -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Erick Perez Panama Sistemas Integradores de Telefonia IP y Soluciones Para Centros de Datos Panama,
2008 Jun 29
2
spam filtering with centos 5.2
In the past I've used a combination of spamhaus combined RBL's and Spamassassin with Mailscanner as my spam recipe, but this stopped working very well for me well over a year ago. As many of the users of the couple small/personal mail servers I run are NOT technical people, and use POP to read their mail, 'training' spamassassin is difficult at best. Once upon a time, using
2008 Oct 31
4
offtopic question .. apprecyice ur help
Dear All, its a offtopic question but really apprecite if someone would advise n help i have been running a mil server with sendmail and have sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org as my dnsbl. i had other servers which are alredy out now that is relays.ordb.org and dsbl.org have already been out of my sendmail config. any one knows of ny other servers i could add in my sendmail config apprecite ur help
2011 Jul 18
2
Spamhaus with Zimbra Mail on CentOS
I realize this is slightly off topic, but I've noticed recently that I've been unable to preform RBL lookups using the the zen and sbl spamhaus RBL lists. Currently using Zimbra Collaboration Suite using CentOS 5 I'm seeing logs showing the following output. [root at phantom ~]# cat /var/log/zimbra.log | grep spamhaus Jul 18 13:07:12 phantom postfix/smtpd[27001]: warning:
2017 Jun 28
10
ransomware etc
Hi all, Just out of curiosity: is there anything we can do, on the samba side, to counter the recent ransomware attacks? (or limit the damage done) I'm thinking like: limit the number of files per second a client (workstation) is allowed to edit, or some other smart tricks..? It would be nice if samba could be an extra layer of defense. Something perhaps a vfs module could help with..?
2005 Mar 25
4
Spam to this list
Hi, I'm not sure what the policy of this list is and I bet everyone has a spam filter, so nobody might have noticed, but we got spammed. Can anyone send mail to the list or do you have to subscribe first ? -- dag wieers, dag@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
2005 Oct 27
2
[info] Spamcop listing
Smtp1.song.fi and smtp2.song.fi, our list servers, seem to have gotten listed in the bl.spamcop.net RBL. Spamcop listings are temporary and will time out, and because of occasional major false positives (or perhaps collateral damage?) like this I don't use it to reject mail. Anyone who IS using Spamcop to reject mail has missed much of today's list traffic. -- mail to this
2010 Apr 15
5
Apparent BIND problem doing RBL lookups for Postfix
My apologies if I'm posting the wrong place, or am asking a common question. All my looking so far hasn't turned up anything very useful in knowing what to look at, or what to modify. --- CentOS 5, running BIND 9.3.6 i386 Hardware: P4, 2.8Ghz, 1G memory Sata drives - non mirrored etc. Load is light, usually under 0.1 -- This box is running Postfix as our mail server. BIND (9.3.6)
2019 Jun 17
1
Postfix and choice of RBL
Am 17.06.2019 um 16:50 schrieb Bowie Bailey: > On 6/17/2019 6:20 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm managing several mail servers running CentOS 7, Postfix and Dovecot. >> SpamAssassin is filtering mail nicely, but I'm considering using RBL >> (blacklists) to take some load off the servers. >> >> General question to those of you who use
2010 Apr 12
2
Being attacked by an Amazon EC2
>>> Perhaps if there was a Asterisk RBL we could all contribute to; for >>> which we could then hook into and drop any connection where a >>> source IP is listed ? -- Thanks, Phil >>> >> >> I love the idea of a RBL... count me in for contributing. >> >> Especially considering the ridiculous response I received from >> Amazon.
2009 Jan 25
2
how to build a small asterisk pbx
Hi i must build a small phone pbx system. My friend has : 3 phone analog lines 6 phone extension How can i build that thelephone system? Nightduke
2020 Apr 19
5
Sendmail not working
All; I installed sendmail via yum, but if I test it like this: echo "Subject: sendmail test" | sendmail sbob at quadratum-braccas.com I get a local mail on the server with this every time: Message? 1: From MAILER-DAEMON at kdb-bugs.example.com? Sun Apr 19 10:15:00 2020 Return-Path: <MAILER-DAEMON at kdb-bugs.example.com> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 10:15:00 -0600 From: Mail
2008 Aug 31
1
Howto: postfix_restrictions
Hey Ned, I found this very useful to test that the RBL was working: http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=Spamhaus%20SBL#207 " How do I test my SBL setup? Once you have set up your mail server to use sbl.spamhaus.org (or the preferred zen.spamhaus.org), you can test to see if the SBL blocking is working by sending an email (any email) to: nelson-sbl-test at crynwr.com
2020 Apr 19
1
Sendmail not working
On 4/19/20 10:36 AM, Tim Evans wrote: > On 4/19/20 12:28 PM, S.Bob wrote: >> All; >> >> >> I installed sendmail via yum, but if I test it like this: >> >> > >> The original message was received at Sun, 19 Apr 2020 10:02:56 -0600 >> from localhost [127.0.0.1] >> >> ??? ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
2007 Sep 18
3
Postfix Questions
I've been running sendmail since the beginning of my online time. 1. Did I see that postfix can run sendmail milters? 2. If so, did I read that postfix can run these separately for inbound vs. outbound? 3. Can it run like a rbl blacklist on inbound and not outbound? 4. If the above is true, does this require separate configurations of postfix or is it already set to allow this out of the
2020 Apr 19
5
[Off topic] sending mail from Comcast was: Sendmail not working
> -----Original Message----- > From: S.Bob > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 2:26 PM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [Off topic] sending mail from Comcast was: Sendmail not working > > I followed this guide: > > > https://pepipost.com/tutorials/install-sendmail-server-centos-7/ Sigh - bad examples for you.... undo if you can. Postfix provides the
2020 Apr 19
3
[Off topic] sending mail from Comcast was: Sendmail not working
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Evans > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 12:50 PM > > On 4/19/20 12:38 PM, S.Bob wrote: > > > > On 4/19/20 10:36 AM, Tim Evans wrote: > >> On 4/19/20 12:28 PM, S.Bob wrote: > >>> All; > >>> > >>> > >>> I installed sendmail via yum, but if I test it like this: > >>>