similar to: ISC dhcpd and Vista clients

A long time, this apeared on the list: > Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:17:26 -0700 > From: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> > To: Gal Goldschmidt <gal at cs.haifa.ac.il> > Cc: syslinux at zytor.com > Subject: Re: [syslinux] ISC DHCPD Problem and Solution. > > Gal Goldschmidt wrote: > > > > All the station in that group suddenly did not receive the net

Hello all, I have set up a samba4 server with bind9 and the bind_dlz module. Everything is working as it should but now I need to allow the dhcp server to add entries to the forwarding zone. Has anybody implemented such a configuration ? Can this be done with the kerberos DNS dynamic update configuration. I want to achieve the following: 1) allow non-Windows machines (printers, ILO ...) to be

Does anyone remember if there is a way to coerce the ISC DHCPD version 2 (2.0pl5) to send options to a PXE client that does not explicitly request them. I can do this in version 3 of DHCPD via the vendor-option-space mechanism, but this is not available in version 2 of the server (the version my network switch uses). I want to be able to specify the PXE filename via option 209 (plus option 208

On 8 Nov 2019 at 0:42, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > [in response to my = Frank Rysanek's rantings a few hours earlier:] > > if option architecture-type = 00:09 { > > filename "path/to/EFIx64/syslinux.efi"; > > } ... > > if substring (option vendor-class-identifier, 15, 5) = "00007" { > > filename

Dear gentlemen, here goes the documentation fix I was talking about :-) The Wiki page on PXElinux, specifically the chapter on UEFI at the end of that page: https://wiki.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=PXELINUX#UEFI ...contains a few examples of ISC DHCPd configuration. The stumbling block for me was the syntax of these "if" scopes: if option architecture-type = 9 { filename

Hi, I already solved this problem, I offer this a part of the FAQ or as a starting point for an FAQ addition I was using the RH pxe support, but I got tired of pressing F8. I wanted to make a few machines to auto boot without any intervetion, well that's what dhcp/bootp/pxe is all about right? I followed the HOWTO on the pxelinux site. I desperately upgraded to the latest ISC 3.1p9. The

Everyone, I am trying to set up a second internal network (192.168.0.0/24) and have not been able to get dhcp to start when I have the following in my dhcpd.conf file : subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.0.110 192.168.0.130; option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; option broadcast-address 192.168.0.255; option routers 192.168.0.1; option

Everyone, I am trying to set up a second internal network (192.168.0.0/24) and have not been able to get dhcp to start when I have the following in my dhcpd.conf file : subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.0.110 192.168.0.130; option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; option broadcast-address 192.168.0.255; option routers 192.168.0.1; option

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.28 Severity: normal Hi, the Internet Software Consortium changed the name to Internet Systems Consortium. For a fix for the logcheck rules see the attachment. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel:

Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > The dhcpd.conf examples in the wiki page were modified from "nn:nn" to > "decimal" format by HPA in 2016 (quoting HPA: "UEFI - clean up > dhcpd.conf examples"). > > Please note that several other sites (e.g. the FOG wiki) also use > simple decimal notation for these types of examples. Whether the > decimal

> Dear gentlemen, > > here goes the documentation fix I was talking about :-) > > The Wiki page on PXElinux, specifically the chapter on UEFI at the end > of that page: > https://wiki.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=PXELINUX#UEFI > ...contains a few examples of ISC DHCPd configuration. > > The stumbling block for me was the syntax of these "if"

On 16/01/17 17:12, James A. Peltier wrote: > VLANs are your friend, otherwise DHCPD is not going to understand how to properly answer your request for different networks on the same interface. > > ----- On 14 Jan, 2017, at 11:59, Gregory P. Ennis PoMec at PoMec.net wrote: > > | Everyone, > | > | I am trying to set up a second internal network (192.168.0.0/24) and > | have

Hello, I try to set up a AD with bind9 and isc-dhcp-Server for dynamic DNS-updates. I followd the wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_wi th_BIND9 But I have this error: Oct 7 12:17:36 samba467 dhcpd: execute_statement argv[0] = /etc/dhcp/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh Oct 7 12:17:36 samba467 dhcpd: execute_statement argv[1] = add Oct 7 12:17:36 samba467 dhcpd:

Hello Rolawnd, I followed the wikipage exactly. Bind9 is installed on the Samba DC. The Linux-Client should be a member of the Active Directory-domain? Regards ----- Mensaje original ----- De: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Para: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Enviados: Sábado, 7 de Octubre 2017 13:29:43 Asunto: Re: [Samba] bind9 and isc-dhcp-Server for

Anybody have any experience with setting up dhcpd in failover mode between two servers? I set this up on a couple of servers, and it seems to be working, but I don't think it is working "right". It appears both servers are replying to all requests (which for renewals works okay because they both give the same address, but new requests get two different responses). I thought that

I've installed CentOS-6 on my server (in parallel to CentOS-5.6) and now I'm trying to set up dhcpd. I'm not sure if there has been a change in dhcpd under CentOS-6, but I'm getting the dreaded message "Not configured to listen on any interfaces!" when I "sudo service dhcpd restart". I realise now that I have never known how the connection between interface

This is my named.conf options { directory "/var/cache/bind"; notify no; empty-zones-enable no; auth-nxdomain yes; listen-on-v6 { none; }; forwarders { 192.168.10.3; 10.0.0.3; }; allow-query { 127.0.0.1/32; 192.168.16.0/24; }; allow-recursion { 127.0.0.1/32;

This might be a bit offtopic, but: How to run bind and dhcpd as slave on windows 2008 ad domain. Is it possible? -- Eero, RHCE

Hi Rowland, I have not another dhcp server. dnsmasq is not configured. I think the problem may be permissions. Which distribution linux do you use, Ubuntu? I was tracing the script code dhcp-dyndns.sh, when the execution on the first line fails Is correct this instructions in Debian: chown root:root /etc/dhcp/dhcpduser.keytab chmod 400 /etc/dhcp/dhcpduser.keytab ----- Mensaje original

I'd like to consolidate the services from several old servers onto 2 CentOS7 VMs that are currently running dhcpd in a balanced/failover configuration. It will simplify things to add the IPs from the old servers as aliases, at least temporarily so everything will continue to connect without changes. However, after adding the first one, I see in the logs that DHCPD is sending its DHCPACKs