similar to: Simple IP Question

I''ve been using Puppet now for a month or so and I''ve come to a problem that may warrant an additional Puppet metaparameter. I''m advocating the addition of a metaparameter called "preaction" (or something like that), which will perform some arbitrary action before the resource is modified. There may be a way to do this within Puppet already (with some

Hi, I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as follows: nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address And the operating systems is extremely slow Interfaces files : [root at localhost ~]# cat

I have CentOS 4 running on an old (early model) p3 with 64 MB RAM. It is acting as a router and firewall for my LAN. CentOS is doing a really good job with Shorewall + DHCPd - on a 10 Mbps cable modem, I see ~ 9.7 Mbps of throughput even when numerous tcp streams to different LAN hosts are running. I would like to add a virtual interface to one of my LAN interfaces. My LAN interface

> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400 > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> > >> From: Gordon Messmer >> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM >> >> On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: >> > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every >> > was possible to be able to access the guest from the LAN

Some of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux servers in our environment sometimes get assigned virtual IP addresses (eth0:1, eth0:2, etc). Puppet Dashboard''s parameters seem like an ideal way to define and provision virtual IPs on these servers. One could create a "vip1" parameter on a node, and define a value of the IP address to use for that vip. A manifest could then be written to

We just went to replace the bridge/firewall services one one server with the same on another. It's pretty simple, and I literally cloned (w/ rsync) a third server that does this onto the one that will be the new one. Then copied the /etc/sysconfig/iptables from the one being replaced, and brought it up this morning. Nope. We had to put everything back the way it was. The new one sees the two

I have a server with 4 nics. Two are using different internet connections, both with static IP's, and two are connected to our private network. The two internet facing nics seem to be battling over the gateway designation. Which ever I designate as the gateway the other stops responding to incoming traffic. I need both to listen to inbound traffic. One for our main web page and the other

dear All, I'm facing this routing problem, the setup is actualy part of ltsp, but I think this problem is Centos-specific. The server is a Dell Poweredge R210. The install is standard 6.4, updated. I have one nic facing the public internet: vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1 DEVICE=em1 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=d4:ae:52:c1:28:2b NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet

On my CentOS 6 partition of my laptop: First note that for this test, NetworkManager is not running because I did: chkconfig --del NetworkManager and then rebooted. Here is my ifcfg-eth0: DEVICE="eth0" NM_CONTROLLED="no" ONBOOT=no HWADDR=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx TYPE=Ethernet BOOTPROTO=none IPADDR=192.168.2.5 PREFIX=24 GATEWAY=192.168.2.1 DNS1=192.168.2.1 DNS2=192.168.2.1

I need to allocate public IP address to two guest os. I have only 2 network card Interface on server. say eth0 and eth1. I set eth1 a public IP address. so it should in # vi /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1 DEVICE=eth1 BOOTPROTO=static HWADDR=00:1a:4d:83:ad:00 BROADCAST=202.127.29.0 IPADDR=202.127.29.5 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=202.127.29.0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet Question 1: do I have to

Setting up bonding in active-backup mode 1 (using ARP monitoring) on a server, it looked OK, but pulling the active link cable didn't actually work, it didn't fail over. Eventually with manual playing around with modprobe, ifconfig, ifenslave, etc., a solution was stumbled upon: enslave the eth1 device before eth0, and all is good. Why this should matter is a puzzle - I could not find

host and guest both centos 5.5 network is 192.168.62.40 host is setup as follows [root at cloud2 ~]# ifconfig br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1A:64:12:10:D9 inet addr:192.168.62.199 Bcast:192.168.63.255 Mask:255.255.254.0 inet6 addr: fe80::21a:64ff:fe12:10d9/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1705488

Hi folks, I have a server at Soyoustart.com (which is a brand of OVH). I run CentOS 6.7 and have problems with network configuration. I want to add a second public ip (failover ip) to the server and did follow the instructions in the CentOS-section of http://hilfe.ovh.de/AdministrationIpAliasHinzufuegen After executing the required steps I'm not able to reach the host via the second ip

Hi all, I just noticed that my two nics that are bonded via mode 0 are showing the same mac addy in ifconfig. Is this normal? In syslog I keep getting; kernel: pbond0: received packet with own address as source address Some guidance is appreciated before I dive in and troubleshoot. If I don't list the mac addy in my ifcfg-th# files, only one of the 2 nic comes up during boot.

I'm running into a situation where a bogus bonded interface named "bond0" is being created, in addition to the desired "bond2" interface. Can anyone confirm this? Anyone know why it's happening or what I do to get rid of it? I wanted to start my numbering scheme at 2 instead of 0, which I didn't think would be a problem. As you can see, I have no reference

Hi, I'm trying to configure a network bridge over a bonding without any success. Here is my configuration: ifcfg-eth0: DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=00:1E:C9:E8:3F:E5 ONBOOT=yes USERCTL=no MASTER=bond0 SLAVE=yes ifcfg-eth1: DEVICE=eth1 HWADDR=00:1E:C9:E8:3F:E7 ONBOOT=yes USERCTL=no MASTER=bond0 SLAVE=yes ifcfg-bond0: DEVICE=bond0 ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=br0 USERCTL=no ifcfg-bridge0: DEVICE=br0

Hello, I want my CentOS 6.5 computer to have a static IP. Currently I get the IP I want because I have my router assign it on the basis of mac address. I placed the following file as: /etc/sysconfig/networking-scripts/eth0 DEVICE="eth0" BOOTPROTO=static HWADDR=00:1F:D0:9E:AE:67 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet USERCTL=no IPV6INIT=no PEERDNS=yes NETMASK=255.255.255.0 IPADDR=192.168.0.99

Hello, I'm trying to set up IP aliases within a QEMU/KVM guest on CentOS 5.5 x86_64, going through a bridged virtualized interface. The virtualized interface in the guest is configured as follow: # ifcfg-eth1 DEVICE=eth1 BOOTPROTO=none PEERDNS=yes GATEWAY=IP.OF.HOST.GATEWAY HWADDR=11:11:11:11:11:11 IPADDR=IP.OF.GUEST.ETH1 NETMASK=255.255.255.255 ONBOOT=yes ARP=yes USERCTL=no IPV6INIT=no #

Hi, I have an eth0 interface (it's a CentOS 6 guest VM on a KVM host) which is configured as follows (see below) with a primary public IP address of xxx.xxx.xxx.130 (which works fine). I cannot set an alias IP address. I want eth0 to also use another IP address (xxx.xxx.xxx.131, so I create /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:1. Then: # service network restart Shutting down

Hello. I desire to get bridge network working using virt-manager. Centos 7 and centos 7 guest. >From researching I think I need to have a ifcfg-br0 file like this ? cat ifcfg-br0 DEVICE=nm-bridge0 STP=no TYPE=Bridge BOOTPROTO=none IPADDR=192.168.1.8 PREFIX=32 GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 IPV6INIT=no NAME=br0 ONBOOT=yes DELAY=0 Is that for sure needed ? The use that nm-bridge0 as the network name? I