similar to: yum update glitch on latest update to 5.2

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "yum update glitch on latest update to 5.2"

2008 Jul 17
2
gecko-libs dependency resurfaces
In doing an update of centos 5.2 this morning, I observed that the old gecko-libs dependency issue caused yum update to fail because it was required by nspluginwrapper (x64_86), devhelp, yelm and firefox. Also, a firefox (x64_86) showed the red hat splash screen rather than centos. Manual installation of affected rpms using --nodeps (I don't advise this) did not apear to impair the
2008 Jul 06
3
nspluginwrapper failure on x86_64 in 5.2
This was working in 5.1 - I am now getting errors when I try to run a flash video in seamonkey under CetnOS 5.2. Here is the error: For application/x-shockwave-flash found plugin /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so sh: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer: No such file or directory Here is what I have installed: $rpm -qa | grep -i nsplugin
2008 Jul 21
2
nspluginwrapper included in CentOS 5.2 fails completely
I was wondering if anyone else had this problem. I run CentOS 5.2 x86_64 on my workstation at home. Since 5.2 came out with nepluginwrapper bundled into it, none of my plugins work. I thought it was just a problem with the flash plugin, but neither the mplayerplug-in plugins nor the adobe acrobat reader plugin work, either. I have this problem both with the Seamonkey contributed 64-bit build
2008 Oct 18
1
octave
trying to install octave from epel onto centos 5.2, and getting dependency errors. only place I could find this RPM was in epel, which I 'thought' ran on native rhel5/centos5 without requiring any other repos, but I guess I'm wrong?!? google tells me libhdf5 is some sot of 'heirarchial data format' library, whatever that means. # yum install octave Loading
2008 Jun 26
2
Missing NSPluginWrapper.in ReleaseNotes for 5.2
Hello, I just searched the wiki for info about NSPluginWrapper. It's a plugin for Firefox which creates a kind of bridge between i386-plugins and a x86_64 browser. That aside... Well, looking for the string "NSPluginWrapper" and doing a text-search, the only hit is the Japanese version of the Release Notes!? I don't understand any of the text, but I interpret that the
2008 Jul 17
0
CESA-2008:0597 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 firefox Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0597 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0597.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: devhelp-0.12-18.el5_2.i386.rpm devhelp-0.12-18.el5_2.x86_64.rpm devhelp-devel-0.12-18.el5_2.i386.rpm devhelp-devel-0.12-18.el5_2.x86_64.rpm firefox-3.0.1-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm
2008 Jun 27
1
nspluginwrapper
As the subject of nspluginwrapper came up recently, it might be worth mentioning that it's not properly documented. The README seems to be the official nspluginwrapper README, which, oddly enough, states that it's used with the command nspluginwrapper However, RedHat based systems seem to all use mozilla-config-plugin. (I'm not sure about other distributions--FreeBSD uses the more
2007 Nov 12
2
Firfox plugins but no sound
Hello everyone, I run a 64bit system here and install flash plugins for firefox using nspluginwrapper. I get the movies but there is no sound. Flashplayer is: flash-plugin-9.0.48.0-release.i386.rpm nspluginwrappers are: nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.5-1.x86_64.rpm nspluginwrapper-i386-0.9.91.5-1.x86_64.rpm Any help in tracking this down would be great. Thnx. -- Regards Robert Smile...
2008 Jul 17
0
CESA-2008:0597 Critical CentOS 5 I386 firefox Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0597 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0597.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: devhelp-0.12-18.el5_2.i386.rpm devhelp-devel-0.12-18.el5_2.i386.rpm firefox-3.0.1-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm xulrunner-1.9.0.1-1.el5_2.i386.rpm xulrunner-devel-1.9.0.1-1.el5_2.i386.rpm
2019 Jun 25
1
mplayer
We recently installed CentOS 7 from DVD.? Our install selection was the GNOME desktop option. yum update yielded about 465 megabytes of updates all of which were successful with no warnings.? The multi media option was not chosen because KDE was listed. GNOME was not apparent in the software list for the multi media workstation install. Google searches led us to instructions for installing
2007 May 02
4
Good things about CentOS 5; problem with flash in seamonkey
I'd like to point out that overall I am quite pleased with CentOS 5, although I am having more fun with it than I did with 4.4 and I knew less about CentOS then (duh). Most things seem to work fine, including a relatively smooth installation from the DVD image I downloaded, although the number of screensavers I can see (and this could be related to the ATI/dual head problem) is pathetically
2015 Nov 20
5
yum errors
I have inherited centos 6.3 and 6.2 vms in an esxi environment. When I do yum provides ntpd on the 6.3 box I get a lot of errors like: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, presto Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.unl.edu * extras: mirrors.cmich.edu * updates: mirror.steadfast.net http://mirror.unl.edu/centos/6.4/os/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 22 -
2007 Apr 18
1
No sound from Adobe flash player 9.0.31 on CentOS 4.4 x86_64
I have the Adobe (Macromedia) flash player installed on my CentOS 4.4 x86_64 system, but when I try to play a flash movie in SeaMonkey (or Firefox - doesn't matter) I get no sound. I'm using the nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.4 to make it work at all, but there's no sound. All my other sound devices/players work just fine, even my Windows guest on VMWare Server. Any ideas/suggestions? Yes,
2010 Nov 21
1
nspluginwrapper rpms on x86_64? (was: firefox. java. 64 bit. bleah!)
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Lars Hecking <lhecking at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > ?Possibly. Or possibly not. On a closely related topic, can you comment on > ?whether or not it's a good idea to install the nspluginwrapper rpms on x86_64? > ?They seem to be fundamentally broken. > I don't think you need it anymore with FF 3.6.
2008 Jul 17
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 41, Issue 8
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2007 Dec 04
1
5.1 - kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.centos.plus.i686.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download
Thank you for the great CentOS. When trying to update from 5.0 to 5.1, I get an error regarding the centos.plus kernel and headers, "[Errno -1] Package does not match intended download". What'd I do? The end of the yum update results below: Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 11 Package(s) Update
2008 Sep 25
2
fix firefox?
I once had firefox x86_64 installed (because it was the default). But that one has problems with plugins (flash, java), which are much easily solved by using the i386 version. So I unstalled firefox, and installed it again using: yum install firefox.i386 This worked, and even the plugins worked fine afterwards. I did have some problems when uninstalling, because yum insisted on a whole load
2011 Jul 26
1
yum segfault - rpmforge problem?
[root at host ~]# yum clean all Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, protectbase Cleaning up Everything Cleaning up list of fastest mirrors [root at ost ~]# yum search libcli Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, protectbase Determining fastest mirrors * base: centos-distro.cavecreek.net * elrepo: elrepo.imt-systems.com * extras: ftp.ussg.iu.edu * rpmforge: apt.sw.be * updates: mirror.nandomedia.com base
2008 Sep 25
1
yum
How to solve this issue? [root at king rescue]# yum update xulrunner Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.silyus.net * updates: mirror.silyus.net * addons: mirror.silyus.net * extras: mirror.silyus.net Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package xulrunner.x86_64 0:1.9.0.2-5.el5
2008 Jul 17
0
Difficulties with Seamonkey plugins on 5.2
Has anyone else noticed this? I've been running a self-built, working 64-bit version of Seamonkey's 2.01a pre-release (alpha) version for the last six or seven months (because the "contributed" unofficial 64-bit build didn't work right and the official 32-bit release crashed all the time), and it's been working relatively well until recently, particularly in the area of