similar to: libc-client 2007 conflict when updating

Greetings all. I just enabled all repos on my system, to enable me to find a particular package. This is the first time I have noticed all the Centos repos < 5.6 being listed. Is this a new feature, to include all repos pre 5.6 now? Here's the output of the aforementioned yum command - sorry it's a little bit long: [root at karsites ~]# yum --enablerepo '*' --disablerepo

Hi all Dovecotters, Lots of programs (e.g, PHP) link to a library called c-client, which is a derivative of the original IMAP implementation, UW IMAP. (For those new to UW IMAP, read here: http://www.washington.edu/imap/ ) UW IMAP is not in as much of active development as it used to be, so I am curious: I see there is a dovecot shared library. I haven't looked into the details, but

Dear all, after succesfull joining my new samba 4 DC to the domain. There is an error on using, samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names On the new joined dc: dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable Failed nsupdate: 1 How can I fix it!? Dnsupdate on the Master is running well. [root at s4slave etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names IPs: ['192.168.135.253'] Skipping PDC entry (SRV

Hi! I've got troubles with dynamic dns updates. Ubuntu: 12.04 / Samba 4.0.0 / followed off. howto Winsrv: Server 2k8R2 root at tuxsrv:/home/schau# samba -V Version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-94f11e9 root at tuxsrv:/home/schau# kinit administrator at SCHAU.LOCAL Password for administrator at SCHAU.LOCAL: root at tuxsrv:/home/schau# klist Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Default principal: administrator

Hello, Replication from backup Active Directory Domain Controler to primary Active Directory Domain Controler does not work, reporting error ' WERR_BADFILE '. The reverse works. * Linux: Raspbian, debian stretch lite * Samba version 4.5.12-Debian * DNS: BIND9_DLZ 9.10.x * Installed packages: ntp ntpdate samba smbclient winbind libcups2 samba-common cups ldb-tools bind9

Hi all I have configured domain controler in debian 9 (samba 4.5.12-Debian). Dns is internal samba. locally works well (I think) but from another computer I can not query DNS. The problem is with samba_dnsupdate My configuration: smb.conf # Global parameters [global]     netbios name = DC     realm = BEWPHOTO.LOCAL     workgroup = BEWPHOTO     dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8     server role = active

Let me set up a Very Dumb Question (VDQ). My apologies in advance for repeating much of this to those who have been of such vast help getting me this far. (Followup to: is set as gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general) I have a testbed machine which currently has /dev/hda1 - 6, according to qtparted, with sizes 102 MB, 14 GB, 13 GB, 13 GB, 12 GB, and 14 MB respectively (rounded to nearest whole MB or

Hello I tried on two vms on my vmware Workstation to use samba as DC. I want use BIND for dns system. To join the Domain had worked successfully after I recompiled the bind. It seems the zone are the same but Samba isn't in the ns-record. If I run dcpromo.exe I get this error message: This Active Directory DC is the last dns-server for the AD-zones. If I remove the DC the dns-names

Hello everybody, I've had a samba environment with the following "brief" description: - There are 2 DC (*samba4 *and *samba4bkp*) running samba version 4.1.6 on my domain (*SMB*). DNS back end is Samba Internal DNS; - I've added a new DC (*king*) running samba version 4.10.2 and as DC to *SMB *domain with BIND9 DNS Back End; - *king* has updated dns zones and

>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just >> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >> >> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there is >> some entry for the 1st DC, but none for the 2nd (except on the top >> levels: FQDN and _msdcs.FQDN). >> >> Could this have to do with...

Am 10.12.2015 um 15:49 schrieb Rowland penny: > On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: >> >>>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just >>>> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>>> >>>> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there >>>> is some entry for the

Hi, samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names IPs: ['192.168.1.20'] force update: A samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br 192.168.1.20 force update: NS empresa.com.br samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br force update: NS _msdcs.empresa.com.br samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br force update: A empresa.com.br 192.168.1.20 force update: SRV _ldap._tcp.empresa.com.br samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br 389 force update: SRV

Hmm.. > >>>> Could this have to do with... > >>>> a) I demoted my initial 1st DC (seized FSMO roles) and got rid of > >>>> DNS entries via this script on the wiki? > >>>> b) set up the *new* 2nd DC on the hardware of the prior 1st DC > >>>> (with the same IP address)? This can be a problem yes, depending on the order of

On 10/12/15 15:13, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 10.12.2015 um 15:49 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: >>> >>>>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, >>>>> just again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>>>> >>>>> If I go through the DNS

; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure Mayabe update/setup your TSIG key. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_enterprise/2/html/puppet_deployment_guide/generating_a_bind_tsig_key Im also wondering why RH is using : '--disable-isc-spnego' Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org]

Hi Ole, Using internal DNS samba_dnsupdate does not work correctly, at least not every time. Someone modified this samba_dnsupdate tool commenting this line: os.unlink(tmpfile) which should line 413. Doing that he was able to get files generated by samba_dnsupdate to use them as argument of nsupdate command (without -g switch and with "allow dns updates = nonsecure" in smb.conf). I

On 12/08/2019 20:19, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > Hi Rowland, > did read, actually cited the page it myself, but didn?t help me to identify the cause. > Kerberos credentials exists, dns users exists, file permission are correct. So either that is insufficient or I am blind.. > Regards, Joachim > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba <samba-bounces at

Many (many) hours later, I'm finally throwing in the towel and seeking help. I have read everything I can find on the internet to no avail to get past my issues. I have to say, I'm very disappointed in the general quality and fragmentation of information on this topic. Samba isn't a turn-key solution as an AD by any stretch of the imagination. I've run the gamut so far with

> So you never read this: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_Back_End_of_a_Samba_AD_DC > Which means that you probably never ran the aptly named > 'samba_upgradedns'Of course I ran this. Many times. I'm not stupid, Rowland. At least I can read:D If I've seen that Bind doesn't work, I had to change backend to internal DNS.I carefully read and made

One of our Windows machines here has this interesting property that I could not duplicate in Linux (F8, but I'll check it later at home from C5.1, too). If I open a DOS window, set the properties to have a white background with dark blue font, telnet to another machine, and run some commands, sometimes the commands echo in gray on black (and stay that way). For example, the default ls (which