similar to: bind9, SELinux, ServFail

I installed Bind9 on a new ubuntu 13.04 server using apt-get install bind9 and am trying to integrate AD into it. Bind starts fine and will resolve my domain and computer names, but when I add the line include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf" into /etc/bind/named.conf, Bind9 fails to start. I have edited that file to ensure the correct line is included for Bind 9.9, and I am not

Hello, I have been using FreeBSD-7.0STABLE with BIND-9.4.2 ( i guess, forget to check before upgrade) up to 2008-01-26 (yesterday). But after upgrade FreeBSD-7.0STABLE-->FreeBSD-7.1STABLE everything goes wrong. 1.BIND can't start anymore and giving me following message at /var/log/messages: . . . Jan 27 12:30:20 ns kernel: ad4: 152587MB <WDC WD1600AAJS-75PSA0 05.06H05> at

I just can't seem to get dynamic DNS updates working on CentOS 6.4 with samba 4.0 .tar.gz from samba.org using BIND9_DLZ. If I run bind 9.8.2.rc1 in debug mode and go to a domain joined windows client and run 'ipconfig /registerdns' this is what I get in my console: 31-May-2013 23:51:06.520 client 10.0.0.106#54352: new TCP connection 31-May-2013 23:51:06.520 client 10.0.0.106#54352:

Hi all! Again, unexpected behaviour! When I set in smb.conf idmap uid = 10000-20000 idmap gid = 10000-20000 I CAN change and SEE domain users ang groups as I change the owner of a file on Unix: chown domain+user ./test.txt chgrp domain+group ./test.txt ls -l /tmp -rw-r--r-- 1 user group 0 Feb 4 20:25 test.txt <- I SEE DOMAIN USER AND GROUP BUT I'm NOT able to telnet or ftp

Hi; Through samba4 BDC server not update DNS record in PDC DNS server. please see logs 04-Jul-2012 10:22:19.800 client 192.253.8.25#1081: send 04-Jul-2012 10:22:19.800 client 192.253.8.25#1081: sendto 04-Jul-2012 10:22:19.800 client 192.253.8.25#1081: senddone 04-Jul-2012 10:22:19.800 client 192.253.8.25#1081: next 04-Jul-2012 10:22:19.800 client 192.253.8.25#1081: endrequest 04-Jul-2012

Mike, I got it working!! Have a look at what I have, here is my smb.conf and my pam.conf. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = RRLNTD01 server string = SUN001 security = DOMAIN password server = nts009 log level = 10 syslog = 7 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast

Has anyone got Bastille-linux running on Centos-5.6? http://bastille-linux.sourceforge.net claims RHEL5 support but I ran into problems running it on a Centos 5.6 test system. First I had to "ln -s /usr/lib64/Bastille /usr/lib" just to get it to run at all. Then I tried faking /etc/redhat-release with Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.6 ... but I get this (why would it want

> There is a bug with nss_ldap and bash32 ... I created a new RPM for the > nss_ldap that is currently in our testing repo. Johnny, I was wondering if that RPM includes the security fixes detailed in https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0389.html Thanks in advance, M

Recently I'm getting these errors on my slave when adding new domains: Sep 26 13:48:27 hosting named[1668]: zone wholesaletvtime.com/IN: refresh: unexpected rcode (SERVFAIL) from master 207.218.174.4#53 The master/slave transfers work for the other 1000+ domains that I have, just not the handful of new ones that I just added after the CentOS 4.3 -> 4.4 upgrade. I regenerated the

On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:52:28 +0100 L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > Hai, >   > I've checked out the log you send and i re-read the complete thread. >   > Based on thats done and what i did see in you logs now, looks like a > * (wildcard)  entry is giving the problem. But i am not sure of that, > the wildcard bugs should be fixed, when i look in

Hello, we encountered a problem with registry nic.at for tld .at and their transaction "BillWithDraw". This transaction allows an registrar to delegate authority back to registry. For a successful use of this transaction all nameserver-entries for the zone will be deleted by our application before nic-order will be sent to nic.at. Nic.at now checks all nameserver for existing

------Original Message------ From: centos-request at centos.org Sender: centos-bounces at centos.org To: centos at centos.org ReplyTo: centos at centos.org Subject: CentOS Digest, Vol 71, Issue 28 Sent: Dec 28, 2010 12:00 PM Send CentOS mailing list submissions to centos at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos or,

Hai,   I've checked out the log you send and i re-read the complete thread.   Based on thats done and what i did see in you logs now, looks like a  * (wildcard)  entry is giving the problem. But i am not sure of that, the wildcard bugs should be fixed, when i look in bugzilla.  (#10435 #12952 )   I've forwarded the mail to Rowland also before we go throw things at you again. ;-)

Hello Rowland, I have already checked and the DN's are in AD, see attached. SOA: <domain>.corp. 3600 IN SOA psad102zadprh.<domain>.corp. . 9766 3600 600 86400 3600 See below NS, but the 1st NS (zatprdc001) doesn't exsit, and I cannot find it anywhere. NS: <domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS zatprdc001.<domain>.corp. <domain>.corp. 3600