similar to: pm-utils - ATrpms updates a system package on the stable branch

Hello, I'm using centos5 and i just started noticing a timeout msg when running a yum update. It occurs with the atrpms repo, has anyone else seen this? Thanks. Dave. #yum update Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Update Process Setting up repositories http://dl.atrpms.net/el5-i386/atrpms/stable/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 12] Timeout: <urlopen error timed out>

Tried mailing the maintainer, but didn't get a response -- anyone know what's happened to the ATrpms repo? Not only is http://atrpms.net/name/dovecot/ empty, but: http://packages.atrpms.net/dist/el6/ seems to return a 404. Some of the mirrors still have the packages, but does anyone know if they're going to continue to build 2.2.x packages? w

I copied exactly where Axel provided into atrmps.repo. I have the line: atrpms.repo:baseurl=http://dl.atrpms.net/el5-x86_64/atrpms/stable but the rpms that are being flagged as updates pretty much all have fc5 in their names. e.g.: ---> Package mplayer-fonts.noarch 4:1.0-7.at set to be updated ---> Package mplayer.i386 4:1.0-60_r23482.fc5 set to be updated ---> Package

I think I found one of my setup problems. I followed instructions at: http://atrpms.net/install.html And now I see that the information shown there to put into yum.conf (that I put into yum.repo.d/atrpms.repo) is only for FC, not for RL5 (thus Centos 5). What do I use in my atrmps.repo to get it to access the RL5 directories?

hello all hello centos network What are your tips for successful migration for dovecot (atrpms , atrpms-testing depot ) the page of wiki http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.0 explains the method to upgrade I tried on my personal machine and the command cites wiki returns errors on the terminal what to do with errors: correct the error in the configuration file ? many returns are welcome

Haven't been able to reach atrpms.net for over a week from London, UK, when i last looked for it after a couple of intervening months. Did i miss something? And if atrpms is truly defunct, where's a good place to obtain updated versions of vlc and mplayer now? thanks! - cal

Afternoon, Sorry for being dense but I can seem to configure the repo for atrpms correctly. I've tried a few things and none of them seem to work so rather than embarrass myself in regard to yum repo configuration, can someone post the repo configuration? TIA! Jeff

Hi guys - brand new 5.1 install here and quite happy - but... The nv driver did not work at all for me, fritzy stripes and dots. This is a GeForce 7300 LE which was working happily dual-head under FC6 with the livna nvidia RPMs So I looked around and it seemed like the ATRpms repo via yum was the best option for CentOS. This is what I installed, it worked great with the xorg.conf from the

HI all, Has anyone succesfully installed an AVM Fritz! card on Fedora 7 using the drivers at ATrpms recently? http://atrpms.net/dist/f7/fcpci/ I tried with a clean F7 build on my EPIA 5000 yesterday, after modifying /etc/capi.conf (removing the coment # in front of fcpci line) I received the following error when executing 'capiinit' - FATAL: Error inserting fcpci

Does anyone known whats going on with atrpms.net ? I see an unreachability since some days ... -- LF

Hi. I'm fairly new with CentOS but have been using version 4.2 with great satisfaction (Thank you!). I've been using repos such as Dag and Dries successfully to keep my packages up to date. (I've seen many posts which allow me to believe that these repos won't change CentOS compatibility to RHEL4 or to migrate it another distro for that matter!) My question applies to the

Hi Everyone, I am still unable to start Asterisk 1.4 that I installed using ATrpms. I was initially suspecting some permissions issues but it seems to me that its more to do with a speex codec not loading properly. Here is the message I get if I run asterisk -cvvvvvvvvvvvvvv app_userevent.so => (Custom User Event Application) == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/codecs.conf': Found --

Hi all :-) This is my first post: I'm coming from debian/bsd world. A question about repositories: minimal installation (version 7) provides: CentOS-Base.repo CentOS-CR.repo CentOS-Debuginfo.repo CentOS-fasttrack.repo CentOS-Sources.repo CentOS-Vault.repo I known there are others repositories as: RPMForge, EPEL, REMI, ATrpms, Webtatic (and maybe also others) so, what kind of these

Thanks to Earl for the NUX repo recommendation. Good VLC and ffmpeg versions (for CentOS) here. From what i can tell, atrpms died a death earlier this year or the end of last cheers - cal sawyer Earl A Ramirez <earlaramirez at gmail.com> wrote: To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Is ATRPMs dead? On 14 Sep 2015 14:12, "Cal Sawyer"

On 14 Sep 2015 14:12, "Cal Sawyer" <cal-s at blue-bolt.com> wrote: > > Haven't been able to reach atrpms.net for over a week from London, UK, when i last looked for it after a couple of intervening months. Did i miss something? > > And if atrpms is truly defunct, where's a good place to obtain updated versions of vlc and mplayer now? > > thanks! > >

Hi, I just want to install dovecot 1.0 beta7 from atrpm and noted that it depends on a non official dependency. If you have RHEL4 (Centos) 4.3 fully updated and you try to install: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/dovecot-1.0-0_10.99.beta7.el4.at.i386.rpm You get this error: # rpm -ivh dovecot-1.0-0_10.99.beta7.el4.at.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: openssl >= 0.9.7f-4 is needed by

On 20/06/2015 15:13, Leon Fauster wrote: > Does anyone known whats going on with > atrpms.net ? I see an unreachability > since some days ... > > -- > LF > > Not sure what the problem is this time, and I hope its just temporary, but its been on its way out for a long time. I've taken this opportunity to move stuff to the nux repository. I've found everything I was

Earl A Ramirez wrote: > On 14 Sep 2015 14:12, "Cal Sawyer" <cal-s at blue-bolt.com> wrote: >> >> Haven't been able to reach atrpms.net for over a week from London, UK, > when i last looked for it after a couple of intervening months. Did i miss > something? >> >> And if atrpms is truly defunct, where's a good place to obtain updated >

Greetings all. I just enabled all repos on my system, to enable me to find a particular package. This is the first time I have noticed all the Centos repos < 5.6 being listed. Is this a new feature, to include all repos pre 5.6 now? Here's the output of the aforementioned yum command - sorry it's a little bit long: [root at karsites ~]# yum --enablerepo '*' --disablerepo

I am curious what should be the benchmark for making the choice of switching from 32bit to 64bit Linux? I have a few assumptions below. Is my logic sound? (This is a follow up to the "Adding RAM" thread) Assumptions: 1. 4GB Memory. The main benefit of 64bit mode is the ability to address more than 4GB of RAM. I assume that you use 64bit mode if you want to *efficiently* have