similar to: mock 0.9.{7,10}

Farkas' solution is exactly right. I have been banging my head against this problem for a while now and it wasn't until I finally paced myself and read carefully through the entire thread that I found this solution. Here is the procedure spelled out a bit more precisely. Get the CentOS 5.2 rpms of popt, rpm, rpm-libs, rpm-python and rpm-build. Obviously you can use most any mirror and

Hi, Here's how my epel-7-i386.cfg mock file looks like: http://fpaste.org/164110/19877702/raw/ Do note the 32bit packages are unofficial and unsupported. RedHat does not support 32bit in EL7. HTH Lucian Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> 12/30/14 to CentOS On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > On 01/30/2015 11:56 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >

On Aug 24, 2020, at 16:48, me at tdiehl.org wrote: > > Also, I am trying to add a dist tag to rpms that I build in mock. > In the epel-7 configs I do something like the following: > config_opts['macros']['%dist'] = '.el7.tnt' to get a dist tag on the > rpms. In epel/centos 8 this does not work. > > If I run "mock --debug-config

On 25/08/20 11:27 am, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Aug 24, 2020, at 16:48, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >> >> Also, I am trying to add a dist tag to rpms that I build in mock. >> In the epel-7 configs I do something like the following: >> config_opts['macros']['%dist'] = '.el7.tnt' to get a dist tag on the >> rpms. In epel/centos 8 this does not

Hi Jonathan, On Sun, 23 Aug 2020, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Aug 23, 2020, at 12:07, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >> >> ?Hi, >> >> I am trying to create a mock configuration file that points to my local dnf repo. >> I have the following in the mock config template: >> >> [local-repo] >> name=my-Local >>

On 01/30/2015 11:56 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > This might be an embarrassingly simple question. How are people > building multi-arch library packages on CentOS 7? On older releases one > could "mock -r epel-6-i386" and "mock -r epel-6-x86_64" to build a > library twice. With no 32-bit release, there's no epel-7-i386 target > for mock. Specifying

Just curious - now that rspec (as of 0.9) let''s you choose your mock framework, how many of you are actually using (or planning to use) mocha or flexmock? Anybody planning to use any other mock framework besides rspec, mocha or flexmock? Thanks, David

So, you have to have a full i386 build root to build i386 arch packages .. then only a subset of those built packages are actually used as multilib packages for x86_64. as Nux! said, you have to use the i386 distro to build those. The mock configs we use to build live here: https://git.centos.org/tree/sig-core!bld-seven.git/master/mock Obviously, you would need to modify them for your setup.

Hi, I'd like to ask if anyone's experiencing date shift with rpmbuild/mock on C5. I see +1 day date shift within changelog. Checked with mock-0.9.14-3.el5.hrb and mock-0.6.13-1.el5_2.3. Regards, David Hrb?? Source rpm: [mockbuild at builder2 ~]$ rpm -qp --changelog repoview-0.6.4-1.el4.hrb.src.rpm | less * Wed May 13 2009 David Hrb?? <david at hrbac.cz> - 0.6.3-1 - new upstream

I am atempting to work with some rpms in the c5-testing repo. When I add: [c5-testing] name=CentOS-5 Testing baseurl=http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=http://dev.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-testing to centos-5-x86_64.cfg, saving as centos-5-x86_64-testdev.cfg I get the aformentioned error. Example [mockbuild at localhost ~]$ mock -r

Question: If I use mock to build package rpmA from tarballA but rpmA has a dependency that can only be satisfied by package rpmB which must also be built from tarballB then how does the rpmB built from the tarballB get pulled into mock when building rpmA? I am trying to build httpd-2.4.7 from Apache and that needs apr-devel and apr-util-devel > 1.4. I can build apr and apr-utils in mock but

Morning, somehow the upgrade to 4.4 broke mock on my system: | [angenenr at shutdown SPECS]$mock -r c3-i386 /home/angenenr/redhat/SRPMS/apache-ssl-2.8.28-2el4.src.rpm | init | clean | prep | This may take a while | Could not find useradd in chroot, maybe the install failed? Nope, it's not the config_opts['chroot_setup_cmd'] = 'groupinstall build' issue, as I'm still

I've successfully rebuilt Red Hat EL PHP 5.2.10 RPMs using mock on a CentOS 5.4 i386. I wanted to be able to build both x86_64 and i386 versions so I reinstalled my builder system with CentOS 5.4 x86_64. Now I can build the PHP RPM successful for x86_64, but i386 fails with the following during configure /usr/bin/net-snmp-config: line 43: net-snmp-config-x86_64: command not found For the

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org> Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:07 Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-6416 ] Mock objects shouldn''t define #to_s To: noreply at rubyforge.org Bugs item #6416, was opened at 2006-10-31 15:34 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=7477&aid=6416&group_id=1917

Here''s another one. spec: m = mock("blah") m.should_receive(:foo).with(1) code: m.foo(2) Failure message: Mock ''blah'' expected ''foo'' once, but received it 0 times ------ Twice now I''ve gotten this failure message and wasted time trying to understand why the method foo() was not being called despite all evidence suggesting

I'm having a major frustration with curl. When building curl, if libssl.so.10 is present the curl binary WILL link against it. If curl is configured with an ssl option - the library WILL link against it. If you change the curl configuration options to use a different TLS library (e.g. nss like CentOS does) the curl binary and library will still link against the OpenSSL library.

Hi all, I am mocking the following Rails view (inside a partial): <%= render :partial => "forums/forum", :collection => forum_category.forums.readable_by(current_user? ? current_user : nil) %> My spec fails with the following message: 1) ActionView::TemplateError in ''forum_categories/index (anonymous user) should only render forums accessible to anonymous

This might be an embarrassingly simple question. How are people building multi-arch library packages on CentOS 7? On older releases one could "mock -r epel-6-i386" and "mock -r epel-6-x86_64" to build a library twice. With no 32-bit release, there's no epel-7-i386 target for mock. Specifying --target=i386 or --arch-i386 both fail. Do we have to set up the

Hi all, I looked at the open issues on the bug tracker, but couldn''t find anything related to this. I also searched the archives. And I can''t believe someone didn''t hit on this before. Here''s my spec: context "A project owner" do controller_name :roles setup do controller.stub!(:current_user).and_return(@user = mock("user"))

On Aug 23, 2020, at 12:07, me at tdiehl.org wrote: > > ?Hi, > > I am trying to create a mock configuration file that points to my local dnf repo. > I have the following in the mock config template: > > [local-repo] > name=my-Local > baseurl=http://yumrepo.example.com/yum-repository/local/centos/8/x86_64/ failovermethod=priority > skip_if_unavailable=False >