similar to: Last and final official release candidate of the com.oonics open shared root cluster installation DVD is available (RC4)

Hello, we are very happy to announce the availability of the first official release candidate of the com.oonics open shared root cluster installation DVD (RC3). The com.oonics open shared root cluster installation DVD allows the installation of a single node open shared root cluster with the use of anaconda, the well known installation software provided by Red Hat. After the installation,

Hi all! We have just released new updates for the yum channel of the open-sharedroot software for CentOS4 and CentOS5. With the open-sharedroot software package, you can build up a NFS or GFS based diskless sharedroot cluster with CentOS4 and CentOS5. It also contains a toolset to clone or backup entire diskless sharedroot clusters. Open Sharedroot homepage: http://open-sharedroot.org/

Hi, we are using a SLES10 Patchlevel 3 with 12 Nodes hosting tomcat application servers. The cluster was running some time (about 200 days) without problems. Recently we needed to shutdown the cluster for maintenance and experianced very long times for the umount of the filesystem. It took something like 45 minutes each node and filesystem (12 x 45 minutes shutdown time). As a result the planned

Hi all, We are running CentOS 5.2 64bit as our file server. Currently, we used GFS (with CLVM underneath it) as our filesystem (for our multiple 2TB SAN volume exports) since we plan to add more file servers (serving the same contents) later on. The issue we are facing at the moment is we found out that command such as 'ls' gives a very slow response.(e.g 3-4minutes for the outputs of ls

Hello to everyone on the list, I have upgraded my RHEL4 to RHEL5.1 yesterday (all updates have been applied to it as well). I used to have dovecot v0.99.11 on the old system. Everything was working fine. Now I have 5.1 and its respective dovecot v1.0.rc15. Upon upgrading to RHEL5.1, dovecot no longer works correctly. The first thing I did after rewriting the config file for the updated version,

Hi,all, Is there anyone which installed xen on ibm system x3650? I read a link from redhat: http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/FAQ_46_10304.shtm That is running xen guests on System x3950 is not recommended. I installed rhel5.1 x86_64 on a ibm system x3650 with xen kernel,but I can not install guest with paravirtualizing,the guest os include rhel5.1 32/64bit rhel4.5/32bit the guest crashed when the

We upgraded from a 10/100Mbs to a 2 100/1000 bonding. We notice the speeds of NFS to be around 70-80Mb/sec. Which is slow, especially with bonding. I was wondering if we need to tune anything special with the Network and NFS. Does anyone have any experience with this? TIA

Hi All! I''m using RHEL5.1 in a guest domain and with kernel 2.6.18-53.el5xen. Is need the source of this kernel to compile an application, someone knows how do I get this source? Thanks in advance, Daniel Aparecido Martins Rosa _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, xen-3.0.3-41.el5 on RHEL5.1 I''m trying to use tap:aio thusly: disk = [ ''file:/var/lib/xen/images/webmail.golden.net.img,hda,w'' _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I have a beefy machine (Intel dual-quad core, 16GB memory 2 x GigE) I have loaded RHEL5.1-xen on the hardware and have created two logical systems: 4 cpus, 7.5 GB memory 1 x Gige Following RHEL guidelines, I have it set up so that eth0->xenbr0 and eth1->xenbr1 Each of the two RHEL5.1 guests uses one of the interfaces and this is verified at the switch by seeing the unique MAC addresses.

Does anyone has implemented this sucessfully? I am asking this because we are implementing Xen on our test lab machines, which they hold up to three 3com and intel Nics 10/100mbps based. These servers are meant to replace MS messaging and intranet webservers which holds up to 5000 hits per day and thousands of mails, and probably the Dom0 could not handle this kind of setup with only one 100mbps

I've got 2 old patches that will probably end up getting lost in the list, can someone ack? [PATCH node] Enables ability to have a common shared root [PATCH node] prevent hostvg and sharedroot from accepting same drive input

Hi all, This is today''s xen nightly test report, Xen changeset: #16492 (unstable tree).  Xen0: #325 No new issue today. 1 issue has been fixed. Fixed issue: ================================================= 1) [Stress] HVM RHEL5.1 guest crashed when running crashme. This issue should be fixed by Changeset 16485. Old issues : ================================================= 1)

Hi All, I have posted this messgage yesterday in the Beowulf mailing list, and did not get any responses, as i have tried different Centos kernels to see if the behaviour changes or not, and it did not change much, I am posting it here, I hope no one minds, and thanks in advance for any pointers or clues? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Walid <walid.shaari at gmail.com>

Currently, if you are running CentOS-4.x on a Vmware box you end up with time skew problems. The main fix has been using a set of recompiled kernel that has a HZ that is more fitting with what Vmware expects (eg 100 hz). The 4.7 kernels look like they will not need this: http://jons-thoughts.blogspot.com/2008/04/rhel-and-vmware-time-skew-problems.html Well, I've gotten quite the number of

All, I would like to announce our Official CentOS CD/DVD Vendor Program. We currently have 3 vendors, and 2 more who are putting together their information. (Not bad ... the official program has been going for less than 12 hours :) The details of the program (how to get in it, what they give back to the CentOS Project, etc.) are here: http://www.centos.org/images/CentOS_CD_Vendors.pdf Here is

Hi all, This is our weekly test report for Xen-unstable tree. No new issue found; P1 bug #1339 still blocks our save/restore related cases. Old Bugs: ===================================================================== 1. TSC not accurate in Windows HVM. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1291 2. SMP 32e RHEL5.1 timer would be slow,if under working pressure.

All, I would like to announce our Official CentOS CD/DVD Vendor Program. We currently have 3 vendors, and 2 more who are putting together their information. (Not bad ... the official program has been going for less than 12 hours :) The details of the program (how to get in it, what they give back to the CentOS Project, etc.) are here: http://www.centos.org/images/CentOS_CD_Vendors.pdf Here is

Hi all, We're looking at deploying a small Xen cluster to run some of our smaller applications. I'm curious to get the lists opinions and advice on what's needed. The plan at the moment is to have two or three servers running as the Xen dom0 hosts and two servers running as storage servers. As we're trying to do this on a small scale, there is no means to hook the

hi all i am trying to boot from rhel5.1 x86_64 image. with the following configuration kernel = "/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader" builder=''hvm'' memory = 3048 name = "rhel51" vcpus=1 cpus = "" vif = [ ''type=ioemu, bridge=xenbr0'' ] disk = [ ''phy:/dev/cciss/c0d0p7,ioemu:hda,w'',