similar to: CentOS 5.2 - GFS and glock_purge tunable

Hi all, We are running CentOS 5.2 64bit as our file server. Currently, we used GFS (with CLVM underneath it) as our filesystem (for our multiple 2TB SAN volume exports) since we plan to add more file servers (serving the same contents) later on. The issue we are facing at the moment is we found out that command such as 'ls' gives a very slow response.(e.g 3-4minutes for the outputs of ls

HI, Sorry for repeating same mail ,while composing that mail i mistakenly typed the send button.I am facing problem with my gfs and below is the running setup. My setup Two node Cluster[only to create shared gfs file system] with manual fencing running on centos 4 update 5 for oracle apps. Shared gfs partition are mounted on both the node[active-active] Whenever i type df -h command it

Two web servers, both virtualized with CentOS Xen servers as host (residing on two different physical servers). GFS used to store home directories containing web document roots. Shared block device used by GFS is an ISCSI target with the ISCSI initiator residing on the Dom-0, and presented to Dom-U webservers as drives. Also, providing a second shared block device for quorum disk. If I hit the

I have just finished deploying two Dell PowerEdge 1950s with CentOS 5.1 and Virtuozzo 4. GFS is up and running and Virtuozzo is configured for shared-storage clustering. Everything works adequately but I am wondering if anyone else has experienced load issues like I am seeing. I have three VEs/VMs running, two on one node and one on the other node. One of the VEs on each node are doing very little

Hi there,I run samba as a PDC and tried to make this PDC high available with redhat cluster suite and gfs. I experienced the following problem while doing this: If I set the option locking = no in smb.conf it takes about 4 minutes to copy a file of 1GB size. If I set locking = yes it takes about 1 hour. Im not sure if locking = no sets locking off for all locking options. At least I need locking

Hi, I want to know the tunable parameters in ext2/ext3 filesystem. What are the tunable parameters and what is the effect of tuning those parameters on filesystem? Thanks and Regards, Dilip Kumar Nutakki Software Engineer UNISYS Global Services India, 135/1, Purva Premier ,Residency Road, Bangalore-560025, Ph: +91 80 4159 4947 Mobile: +91 9886485182 -------------- next part -------------- An

Hi all, I'm wondering if I'm running into some dependency issues on my CentOS5 test-machines. I've installed with a fairly minimal package set, updated, removed old kernels and am now experimenting with iscsi and gfs. I think I need kmod-gfs to get gfs -support, but there is only a version that suits the base-kernel, 2.6.18-8.el5. " [root at node02 ~]# yum install kmod-gfs

Thanks to John Newbigin the new GFS packages for the 2.4.21-57.EL kernel are now available. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0259.html i386: csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-6.0.2.36-8.i386.rpm csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-devel-6.0.2.36-8.i386.rpm csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-modules-6.0.2.36-8.i386.rpm csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-6.0.2.36-8.i686.rpm csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-devel-6.0.2.36-8.i686.rpm

Hello, We have two Fedora 5 Servers clustered with GFS. We installed samba and exported the same shares in both of them. All went fine at first, with people accessing to theirs own files and so, but for some programs (minitab, matlab, ...) people need to access the same file at once. Then samba begins to fail and clients hang. In order to fix samba is necessary to restart the service.

Are the RPMs for the latest GFS kernel module GFS-kernel-2.6.9-72.2.0.8 to be used with the version 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL available ? I tried to compile the Source RPMs available from the Red Hat site but the modules can't be loaded because of invalid module format arising from version magic issues. The syslog shows: node0 kernel: gfs: version magic '2.6.9-55.0.9.ELsmp SMP 686 REGPARM

Hi, I am using this document along with the following links to try and assemble a GFS set of mahcines: 1. Log on as the root user. 2. Run up2date --installall --channel Label for Red Hat Cluster Suite. The following example shows running the command for i386 RPMs: # up2date --installall --channel rhel-i386-as-4-cluster 3. (Optional) If you are

GFS 6.0.2-12 is now available for CentOS-3. This version has some small fixes is but is mostly just to support the new CentOS-3 kernel. The files are available from my site here: http://bender.it.swin.edu.au/centos-3/RHGFS/ Tips for updating: Because the dependencies are a bit screwed (thanks to RH), it is probably easiest to do rpm -U

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1234 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1234.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: f20302719dd6cedf4615a4bbbe171b20047aa0b022c897aaeb8e5b4c17d7ace6 kmod-gfs-0.1.34-22.el5.centos.i686.rpm

Announcing CentOS 3 i386 Cluster Suite (CS) and Global File System (GFS) CentOS csgfs is now available for CentOS-3 i386. This is a built from source found here: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/3/en/RHCS/i386/SRPMS/ ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/3/en/RHGFS/i386/SRPMS/ ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/3AS/en/RHCS/SRPMS/

Hi, I have configured two machines for testing gfs filesystems. They are attached to a iscsi device and centos versions are: CentOS release 5.4 (Final) Linux node1.fib.upc.es 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Thu Sep 3 03:33:56 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux The problem is if I try to mount a gfs partition it hangs. [root at node2 ~]# cman_tool status Version: 6.2.0 Config Version: 29 Cluster Name:

Hi all, Since I've got no reply on redhat cluster list, I'm trying here ... I'm testing a rhcs4 cluster with gfs. I noticed some poor performance while tarring data from a gfs volume to a local disk from both nodes at the same time, so I deceided to have a closer look. Here are the bonnie++ results: http://jure.pecar.org/gfs/ I don't know what to think of these ... but I doubt

Author: danice Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 23a634d2405ff5c1e9e1ecf200708d8159060505 Log message: 6364698 Add /etc/system tunable support for XMITS'' UPPER_RTRY counter registers Files: update: usr/src/uts/sun4u/io/pci/pci_space.c update: usr/src/uts/sun4u/io/pci/pcisch.c update: usr/src/uts/sun4u/sys/pci/pci_pbm.h update: usr/src/uts/sun4u/sys/pci/pci_space.h update:

The RX buffer size determines the memory consumption of the vsock/virtio guest driver, so we make it tunable through a module parameter. The size allowed are between 4 KB and 64 KB in order to be compatible with old host drivers. Suggested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare at redhat.com> --- include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1

On 2019/5/13 ??6:05, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2019/5/10 ??8:58, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> The RX buffer size determines the memory consumption of the >> vsock/virtio guest driver, so we make it tunable through >> a module parameter. >> >> The size allowed are between 4 KB and 64 KB in order to be >> compatible with old host drivers. >> >>

Hello list I've installed cluster suite with 8 physical nodes, these are connected to a SAN using CLVM and AOE protocol. The cluster suite runs on the physical nodes/servers, in dom0. If I have to use GFS, where do I install this? What is the right approach to using GFS with Xen. I see 2 options: 1. I install GFS inside each domU (unprivileged domain, the actual VM). 2. I install GFS on