similar to: PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x

Hi, folks. I have download the DVD image of CentOS 5.2. Comparing with the DVD image of Upstream OS Provider, I got a surprise: The size of the DVD image of Upstream OS Provider is just 2.87 GB(i386), but the size of the DVD image of CentOS 5.2(i386) is so large that is 3.74 GB! I kown that CentOS's developers did very excellent work on how to make the Upstream OS more availability and add

Dear all, I am trying to read in big amounts of data with scan. It's only one variable, numeric values, separated by tabs,.. and it's many of them. So I was thinking that I could use the skip option and read in 100000 values at a time - but skip doesn't work, probably because I don't have line breaks in the txt file. So any value specified for skip makes the scan function jump to

Lang - I think there has perhaps been a regression in that case, because I have an example of a trivial IR module that fails to be linked correctly: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32376 Kevin provided some clues about this but I was not able to find a fix. On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > As I left it, lld on Darwin

Dear all, I am attempting to model some one-dimensional data using a mixture model of non-central Student's t distributions. However, I haven't been able to find any R package that provides this functionality. Could there be a way to "manipulate" the EM algorithms from the mixdist or mixtools package to fit the model, or do you have any other suggestions? If anyone could help

Hello, With qpopper you get something like this after a successful login: --- +OK test has 6 visible messages (0 hidden) in 11822 octets. --- This gives a clueful user or support people a quick status about the size of this mailbox, very helpful in full quota scenarios. Would be nice if the next dovecot would have such a feature as well. I doubt the same is (easily) applicable for IMAP (though

Sounds like a fantastic goal, and enticingly close … Kind regards, Peter Kriens > On 11 May 2017, at 20:53, Andrew Kelley <superjoe30 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Zig author here in the same boat. Looks like I'm going to have to disable cross compiling for MacOS and when compiling native for MacOS add a dependency on the system linker. Really looking forward to Mach-O support

Hello, The users here have been migrated to the new mail system with dovecot 0.99.10.5 (Debian package) on the backends. Storage is maildir, only pop3 access for now. I see very seldom occurrences (compared to the session wide pop lock of qpopper on the old system) like this: --- Jun 16 14:35:52 mb01 pop3(user at gol.com): Timeout while waiting for release of exclusive fcntl() lock for index

Hello, even though Timo seems to be hibernating (it's not _that_ cold in ole Suomi ;) I'd like to beg for a feature that would be very much appreciated over here. If something like this is already present and eluded my thorough archive and doc searches, feel free to smack me and then point me to the right direction. Feature request: More extensive session information and statistics in

Hello, On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 20:04:38 +0900 Christian Balzer wrote: > Hello Aki, Timo, > > according to git this fix should be in 2.2.27, which I'm running, so I > guess this isn't it or something else is missing. > See: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859700 > Any update on this? Christian > Regards, > > Christian > > On Thu, 6

Hello, running 0.99.10.6 (but seen it before that, too). Also (quite obviously) running 5 auth processes, given the fact that this is a pretty busy box and I didn't want to introduce any artificial bottlenecks. Alas with them eating up half of the free memory (which would go to a much better use as FS cache) I'm getting sorta concerned. If it's not a leak, it's caching something

Hello, any plans to support this in the future? Seems the inability to use LAST breaks that Yahoo remote mailbox slurper thing, not that I care too much about that, but some mail clients might miss it as well. ;) Regards, Christian Balzer -- Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer NOC chibi at gol.com Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Network Services http://www.gol.com/

Hello, On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 09:24:23 +0300 Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 06.04.2017 07:02, Christian Balzer wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > this is on Debian Jessie box, dovecot 2.2.27 from backports, > > imap-hibernate obviously enabled. > > > > I've been seeing a few of these since starting this cluster (see previous > > mail), they all follow the

> 1. 256GB of real RAM, swap is for chums. Are you sure that 100,000 IMAP sessions wouldn?t work well with SWAP, especially with fast SSD storage (which is a lot cheaper than RAM)? Seems that these IMAP processes are long lived processes (idling most of the time) that don?t need that much of the contents of real memory available for much of the life of the process. I use a database proxy in

On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 07:05:43 +0200 Urban Loesch wrote: > Hi, > > Am 03.07.2015 um 05:14 schrieb Christian Balzer: > > > > > 2. Here is where the fun starts. > > Each IMAP session that gets proxied to the real mailbox server needs a > > port for the outgoing connection. > > So to support 2 million sessions we need 40 IP addresses here. Ouch. > >

Hello, I'm willing to swear that with the 0.99.10.4 Debian package in my rather extensive tests with mailbox format dovecot created not only any missing parental directories but also the INBOX file, but the later I can't prove/test now as I upgraded all respective boxes. However 0.99.10.5 will still create (if needed and possible) missing directories for mbox storage, just not an

> 1500 IMAP sessions will eat up about 3GB alone. Are you saying that Dovecot needs 2MB of physical memory per IMAP session? If I want to support a max 100,000 IMAP sessions per server, I should configure the server to have at least 200GBs of SWAP? > On Feb 10, 2017, at 3:58 AM, Christian Balzer <chibi at gol.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 01:13:20 +0530 Rajesh M wrote:

Thanks for the info. I do have one further question for you. On your servers that are currently handling 50k IMAP sessions, how many users does that correspond to? Since many users will have multiple IMAP sessions on multiple devices, I?d like to hear about some real-world numbers that could be used for budgeting a new project like mine. Also, do you use Dovecot IMAP proxies in front of your

Hello, just to soothe my paranoia from many years of qpopper usage, which enforces solitary access to a POP mailbox. Only one login per user is possible at the same time and if a session terminates w/o qpopper being properly notified it will remain locked for some time, 30 minutes by default. With dovecot (0.99.10.4) one can login multiple times (using POP, with IMAP of course this comes as

Thanks for the answer. However, this means I need a different linker for MacOS as for Windows/Linux? I guess it is a not a major thing but I was hoping to set up a cross compile env. where only the header files and shared libraries differed :-( I guess we’re not there yet … :-) Kind regards, Peter Kriens > On 6 May 2017, at 19:57, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > >

Daniel, thanks so much for the detailed pointers. So it turns out to be both the evil that is systemd and an overzealous upgrade script. Apollon, should I raise a Debian bug for this? As for reasons, how do 50k proxy session on the proxy servers and 25k imap processes on the mailbox servers sound? Even on a server with just 6k users and 7k imap processes that causes a massive load spike and a